United International Business Schools - UIBS vs Universitat de Barcelona - UB vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs La Salle U.R.L. vs UIC Barcelona
Side-by-side comparison from 213 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Positive and enriching learning experience
- +Safe and well-equipped campus
- +Engaging academics and supportive faculty
- +Vibrant international student environment and cultural diversity
- +Inspiring city setting and academic challenges
- +Personalized faculty support and professional development
- +Organized and clear program delivery with helpful staff
- +Excellent academic environment and modern facilities
- +International environment and diverse cultures
- +Engaging, proactive, and technology-focused learning methods
- +Strong academic content and knowledgeable faculty
- +Excellent academic quality and well-prepared graduates
- +Supportive and international student community
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Expert faculty and practical, hands-on learning
- +High-level, industry-relevant music programs
- +Supportive learning environment for skill development
- +Dedicated teaching staff and cutting-edge facilities
- +All-embracing campus atmosphere
- +Flexible housing options
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources for students.
- -Inflexible and traditional teaching methods with limited student interaction.
- -Lack of digital resources and support for remote learning.
- -Poor management and unprofessional leadership.
- -Incompetent teachers due to unqualified hiring practices.
- -Outdated curriculum and outdated facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Lack of forward-thinking and innovative educational approach.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Unhelpful and indifferent staff.
- -Deceptive financial practices.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and a lack of engagement hinder academic progress.
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a concern.
- -Limited academic support and unengaging teaching methods are disliked.
Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.
Overall, the university garners favorable ratings across key areas. Student Life and Value emerge as the strongest aspects, both scoring over 4.0. Professors also received high marks. Accommodations represent the weakest point, though still a respectable score. The university demonstrates a good balance, particularly in its student experience and perceived worth.
This institution receives commendations across several key areas. Accommodation stands out as its strongest point, boasting the highest rating. Other well-regarded aspects include facilities and professors, both scoring an impressive 4.25. While student life, internationality, and value are also positively rated, the location is the weakest area of assessment, though still considered good.
Outstanding scores are evident for this university's **Location** (5), **Facilities** (4.67), and **Student Life** (4.67). Conversely, the **Professors** category received the lowest rating at 3.33. Other areas like Accomodation (4.33), Internationality (4), and Value (4) are rated positively.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.25, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.17. **Student Life** is rated a respectable 3.75, while **Internationality** scores 3.83. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating of 3.33, and **Location** at 3.91. The university also scores well in **Value** at 3.92.
Demonstrating notable strengths, this university excels in its professors, location, and student life, all receiving exceptionally high scores. Facilities and value also score well. Areas for improvement include accommodation and internationality, which are rated considerably lower.
This institution garners excellent marks for its **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. Conversely, **Location** and **Student Life** received no rating, indicating these areas may require significant attention or were not assessed. The university appears to excel in its core offerings and student support infrastructure.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising academics, international environment, and supportive professors. A small percentage of feedback (around 4%) notes issues with administrative processes, outdated facilities, and teaching methods.
With a 4.33/5 average rating from 9 reviews, ~78% of feedback is positive. Students praise personalized professor attention, organization, and support. A small amount of negative feedback noted director and faculty issues.
Nearly 83% of reviews are positive, highlighting internationality, relevant projects, and technology focus. One review (~17%) criticizes outdated architectural programs and facilities.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive classmates, and good job preparation. ~7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with unhelpful administration.
With an average rating of 4/5 from three reviews, approximately 67% of feedback is positive. Students praise learning from experienced professionals, practical programs like film scoring, and international recognition in antique music studies. No negative feedback was provided.
The sole review is highly positive, rating 4/5 stars. This indicates strong satisfaction with dedicated teaching, modern facilities, campus atmosphere, and housing options. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive.
Nothing to show
Honestly, I didn't attend class that often, so my connection to the university was more practical than emotional. I appreciated the resources, but I felt disconnected from campus culture. In hindsight, I'd have engaged more, but I also believe that university should facilitate more digital resources and support for those who, for whatever reason, can't always attend in person.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
Flexible as in something that has pros as well as cons. ESMUC is a college with a nice name and prestige in Spain, I would say many if not all of the graduates I've met from the school are highly prepared. The university offers a good ambience for developing your skills with access to its facilities including the recordng studio and rehearsal rooms. Also being a student instantly gices you discounts and access to cultural events like the Auditori Concerts, which is highly appreciated. The quality of your education will depend on the major or course itself, I assisted to the unofficial master degree for film and media scoring. I was particularly thankful because I was able to assist despite not having an official diploma. The master itself is relatively new to the school so there are many flaws that could be improved, including poor planning and organization between courses. They were super valuable classes with highly prepared professor with whom I learned a lot, in contrast, some of them were indifferent to me. The highlight of the program I assisted to was the chance to record with a live orchestra, which was a superb opportunity and expereince. Considering the master degree price. In conclusion, you should consider ESMUC regarding your program choice. I would say overall you'll get good quality education, but a lot of the growth will come of how you manage to make the best out of it.
Nothing to show
