United International Business Schools - UIBS vs University of Urbino vs Istituto Superiore per le Industrie Artistiche di Urbino - ISIA vs Ca' Foscari University Of Venice vs Guglielmo Marconi University
Side-by-side comparison from 84 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Positive and enriching learning experience
- +Safe and well-equipped campus
- +Specialized foreign language programs integrated with marketing knowledge
- +Friendly, accessible professors and small class sizes fostering close relationships
- +Beautiful campus and city environment with good student services
Nothing to show
- +Integrated science and cultural heritage programs
- +Clear, supportive international student experience
- +High-quality professors and industry-relevant curriculum
- +Relevant and in-depth subject matter
- +Competent and knowledgeable professors
- +Convenient telematics access
- +Career-focused and interesting courses
- +Supportive professors and staff
- +Modern and well-equipped campus facilities
- +Integrated academic, clinical, and research environment
- +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, available instructors
- +Excellent preparation, rich internships, and modern facilities
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Ineffective and unsupportive faculty.
- -Administrative inefficiencies and lack of clear communication.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and organizational issues hinder student experience and problem resolution.
- -Poor course structure, lack of depth, and insufficient specialization lead to dissatisfaction with academic offerings.
- -Ineffective communication from staff and limited time for essential activities like lunch are recurring problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a constant concern.
- -Inflexible and poorly communicated academic policies frustrate students.
- -Limited career services and support hinder post-graduation prospects.
- -Excessive fees and unclear financial policies are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -Poor communication and a lack of responsiveness from faculty and administration are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency leads to confusion.
Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.
This institution receives commendable marks, particularly for its **Professors**, which achieved a high rating of 4.5. **Accomodation** also scored well at 4.33. However, its **Internationality** stands out as a weaker area, with a rating of 3.5. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value are all rated consistently around 4.17.
Nothing to show
With ratings spanning across multiple aspects of university life, this institution demonstrates particular strengths in Internationality, scoring a commendable 4.19. Professors and Value also received high marks, both exceeding 4.1. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.05. Facilities and Student Life fall in the mid-range, suggesting areas for potential improvement alongside recognized successes.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its academic offerings, with high ratings for Professors and Value. Conversely, several core areas require substantial improvement. Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Accomodation all received zero ratings, indicating considerable deficiencies. Internationality presents a moderate but still underdeveloped aspect, with a rating of two.
This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas. Its facilities, professors, and location are all highly rated, achieving near-perfect marks. Student life and accommodation also receive positive feedback. However, internationality stands out as the weakest aspect, with a significantly lower score compared to other metrics. The overall value of the university is rated very favorably.
This institution receives outstanding marks, particularly for its **professors** and **value**, which are rated exceptionally high. The **facilities** and **student life** are also strong points. While **accommodation** and **location** are rated slightly lower, they remain positive. The university demonstrates good **internationality**, contributing to a well-rounded experience.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praised the foreign language programs, accessible professors, and beautiful campus.
Nothing to show
~74% of reviews are positive, praising academic quality, international environment, and cultural heritage programs. About 8.6% express concerns about university management and professor responsiveness.
With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%). Students highlight well-suited second-year subjects, particularly in marketing and computer science, taught by competent professors.
All 6 reviews are positive, averaging 4.33/5 stars. Students praise the interesting courses, career opportunities, supportive staff, and good facilities. Some mention a desire for more international focus.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students frequently highlight the strong integration of campus, hospital, and research, along with high-quality teaching and valuable internship opportunities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
As a former student of the Master’s program in Environmental Sciences – Global Change and Sustainability, I can confidently say that my time at Ca’ Foscari University of Venice was one of the most meaningful and transformative experiences of my life. From the very beginning, the university maintained a high level of professionalism and clarity in its communication and academic processes. As an international student, I felt well-informed about enrolment procedures, visa requirements, and academic expectations. The guidance provided made what could have been an overwhelming transition feel structured and manageable. Academically, the program was both challenging and inspiring. The curriculum was well-designed, fully taught in English, and focused on global environmental issues with a strong sustainability perspective. The professors were knowledgeable, supportive, and encouraged critical thinking and research-based learning. The international classroom environment also allowed me to engage with students from diverse cultural and academic backgrounds, which greatly enriched my experience. Beyond academics, studying in Venice added a unique dimension to my journey. The university offered helpful support services, orientation programs, and assistance with accommodation, which made settling into a new country much easier. Looking back, my time at Ca’ Foscari not only strengthened my academic foundation but also helped me grow personally and professionally. I am truly grateful for the opportunity and would highly recommend this program to anyone passionate about environmental studies and global sustainability.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I completed both my Bachelor’s (Triennale) and Master’s (Magistrale) degrees in Biotechnology. Being in a small class was really helpful. It made communication between students and professors much easier. Also, the program offers a one-year internship packed with opportunities! .
