Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires - ITBA vs Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN vs Universidad de Buenos Aires - UBA vs Torcuato Di Tella University - UTDT vs National University of San Antonio de Areco - UNSAdA
Side-by-side comparison from 52 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent and dedicated teachers preparing for real-world challenges
- +Supportive learning environment and community
- +Strong focus on technology and engineering
- +Strong engineering programs with good job prospects
- +Dedicated and experienced teaching staff
- +Flexible learning options and improving infrastructure
- +High academic standards and quality programs
- +Passionate and caring professors
- +Public and tuition-free access
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Expert professors and supportive environment
- +Comfortable, large, and safe campus
- +Specialized and innovative programs, especially in art, technology, health, and environment.
- +Excellent infrastructure and highly qualified faculty.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common grievances.
- -The curriculum and teaching quality are sometimes criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and unhelpful staff.
- -Outdated curriculum and excessively long program duration.
- -Unattractive and uninviting building facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of student support and engagement is a concern.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Disorganized administrative processes and poor communication.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging course content.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant issue.
- -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies cause frustration.
- -A perceived lack of support and engagement from instructors is common.
Across all surveyed aspects, this institution garners perfect scores, indicating an outstanding educational experience. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated as excellent. There are no weak areas identified; the university demonstrates exceptional strength in every category evaluated.
This institution garners its highest marks for **Location** (4.2), a key strength. Professors are also well-regarded at 3.8. Conversely, **Internationality** received the lowest score (2.7), indicating an area for potential improvement. Other aspects like Facilities and Accomodation received moderate ratings, while Student Life and Value fall in the middle ground.
Overall, the university receives strong ratings in most surveyed categories. Professors and value are notably high, alongside excellent student life and internationality. The location is also well-regarded. However, facilities and accommodation received the lowest scores, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, earning a perfect score. It also receives consistently positive feedback for its facilities, professors, accommodation, and overall value, all rated at 4 out of 5. The weakest areas for the university are its location and internationality, both scoring a respectable but lower 3 out of 5.
This institution garners solid marks, particularly excelling in its **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life**, all receiving a score of 4. The university also scores well in **Value**, mirroring these strengths. Its **Location** and **Internationality** are rated moderately at 3. The **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker area, receiving a score of 2, indicating potential room for improvement.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent teachers and strong preparation for the workforce. Facilities are acceptable and undergoing remodeling.
Reviews indicate positive experiences with education, job prospects, and teaching staff (~67% positive). Some negative feedback (~16.7%) mentions outdated curricula and program management issues. The average rating is 3.67/5.
With an average rating of 4.22/5 from 36 reviews, ~92% are positive. Students praise high academic standards, excellent professors, and quality programs that foster critical thinking. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the single review highlights a comfortable, safe, and supportive environment. Expert professors and beautiful grounds are praised. No negative feedback was received.
The university receives positive feedback (~100%) for its strong infrastructure, qualified faculty, and innovative, specialized programs. One review highlighted unique offerings in art, technology, health, and environmental studies.
Undoubtedly Buenos Aires is a big city with many options in terms of higher education, but the Technological Institute is undoubtedly the best option (in my opinion) to study everything related to technology. I studied computer and data engineering, the experience was great. The teachers are qualified, the facilities are acceptable, and the classmates were very supportive.
Nothing to show
One of the best spanish-speak university in the word. Prestigious and free. The lack of material resources encourages one to be proactive and gives you that “street wisdom” that more classy universities dont have.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
