Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires - ITBA vs Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN vs Universidad del Salvador - USAL vs Universidad Nacional de la Matanza - UNLAM vs Universidad de Buenos Aires - UBA
Side-by-side comparison from 65 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent and dedicated teachers preparing for real-world challenges
- +Supportive learning environment and community
- +Strong focus on technology and engineering
- +Strong engineering programs and good job prospects
- +Committed and experienced teaching staff
- +High-quality education providing a solid foundation
- +Highly qualified and supportive teachers
- +Comprehensive and broad program curriculum
- +Positive and well-structured learning environment
- +Supportive and active campus environment
- +High-quality faculty and resources
- +Well-equipped facilities for learning
- +High academic standards and quality programs
- +Passionate and caring professors
- +Public and tuition-free access
- +Modern campus and well-equipped facilities
- +High-quality, progressive academic programs and updated curriculum
- +Supportive and professional faculty and staff
- +Updated and relevant program content
- +Supportive and accessible faculty
- +Well-resourced library and effective virtual learning environment
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common grievances.
- -The curriculum and teaching quality are sometimes criticized.
- -Poor management and administrative support
- -Outdated curriculum and excessive program length
- -Unattractive facilities
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a persistent problem.
- -Ineffective administrative and management support creates significant frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency from the institution is a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and engagement from instructors is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of student support and engagement is a concern.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unresponsive administration create frustration.
- -Lack of clear academic support and guidance leaves students feeling lost.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Lack of communication and transparency frustrates students.
Across all surveyed aspects, this institution garners perfect scores, indicating an outstanding educational experience. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated as excellent. There are no weak areas identified; the university demonstrates exceptional strength in every category evaluated.
This institution performs exceptionally well in location, boasting a rating of 4.09. Professors are also highly regarded at 3.91, and value for money receives a solid 3.73. Student life and facilities are rated moderately. However, internationality stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.82, followed closely by accommodation at 3.27.
This institution presents a well-rounded profile, excelling particularly in **Value**, which received the highest rating. **Professors** and **Student Life** also scored strongly, indicating positive experiences in these areas. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest rating, suggesting it may be an area for improvement. **Facilities** and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range, while **Location** is rated moderately well.
This institution receives excellent marks for its **professors, location, and internationality**, all scoring a perfect 5. Student life and value are also well-regarded with 4s. However, the university's **accommodation** is a significant weakness, rated only 1. Facilities are considered average at 3.
Overall, the university receives strong ratings in most surveyed categories. Professors and value are notably high, alongside excellent student life and internationality. The location is also well-regarded. However, facilities and accommodation received the lowest scores, indicating areas for potential improvement.
An assessment of the university reveals a highly international environment, with a near-perfect score for Internationality. Professors, Student Life, and Value also received excellent ratings. However, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower than other categories. Facilities are rated well, but not exceptionally.
This institution achieves excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, location, and accommodation all received perfect scores, indicating exceptional quality. Student life and professors are also highly rated. The weakest aspect appears to be internationality, with a score of 3.5. Overall, the university presents a strong offering, particularly in its physical resources and accessibility, with excellent perceived value.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent teachers and strong preparation for the workforce. Facilities are acceptable and undergoing remodeling.
With an average rating of 3.69, ~62% of reviews are positive, praising good education and experienced professors. Around 15% are negative, citing outdated curricula and poor program management.
Students praise remarkable teachers, well-organized information, and a broad, holistic program. Positive feedback (~100%) highlights a supportive learning environment and a balanced approach, with minor drawbacks noted on course availability and virtual options.
With a 4.5/5 average rating from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight excellent teachers, equipped facilities, and a student-friendly campus environment. A minor parking inconvenience was noted.
With an average rating of 4.22/5 from 36 reviews, ~92% are positive. Students praise high academic standards, excellent professors, and quality programs that foster critical thinking. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the modern campus, well-equipped facilities, updated curriculum, and professional faculty. They also highlight progressive programs, student well-being initiatives, and opportunities for career development.
With a 4.5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students highlight the updated program content focusing on new technologies and media. They praise excellent professor support and quick assignment feedback, alongside an extensive library.
Undoubtedly Buenos Aires is a big city with many options in terms of higher education, but the Technological Institute is undoubtedly the best option (in my opinion) to study everything related to technology. I studied computer and data engineering, the experience was great. The teachers are qualified, the facilities are acceptable, and the classmates were very supportive.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
One of the best spanish-speak university in the word. Prestigious and free. The lack of material resources encourages one to be proactive and gives you that “street wisdom” that more classy universities dont have.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
