University of British Columbia vs Fleming College vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs General Assembly vs Masters College and Seminary - MCS
Side-by-side comparison from 226 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent professors and engaging courses
- +Valuable career preparation and practical learning opportunities
- +Abundant resources, study spaces, and campus support services
- +Relevant curriculum and practical skills development
- +Supportive and knowledgeable instructors
- +Flexible learning options and engaging campus events
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- +Knowledgeable, supportive professors
- +Abundant study resources and learning activities
- +Networking opportunities
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
- -Administrative & course selection issues are frustrating.
- -Social life can feel superficial and exclusive.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality, with some professors subpar.
- -Outdated facilities and obsolete curriculum are significant concerns.
- -Incompetent instructors and a lack of industry-relevant knowledge acquisition are major drawbacks.
- -The college's reputation and value in the job market have significantly declined.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
- -Outdated facilities and resources.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
- -Lack of practical application and relevant curriculum.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
This institution's surveyed areas reveal a mixed performance. The strongest aspects are Location, scoring 4.45, closely followed by Internationality at 4.35 and Student Life at 4.31. Facilities also received a commendable 4.22 rating. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a score of 3.86, while Professors and Value fall within the mid-range.
This institution garners excellent marks for its international environment, standing out with a high rating for Internationality. The university also scores well in Location and Value. Conversely, Accomodation is its lowest-rated aspect. Facilities and Professors receive similar, moderate scores, while Student Life falls slightly below average.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Overall, this institution garners strong commendations, particularly excelling in its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving perfect scores. Professors and perceived value also score well, indicating solid academic and financial offerings. The weakest area identified is internationality, suggesting room for growth in attracting and supporting a global student body.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.
With 4.23/5 stars from 191 reviews, approximately 74% of feedback is positive, highlighting strong academics, professors, and resources. Negative feedback, representing about 1.1%, mentions course selection difficulties and inconsistent professor quality.
The college receives strong positive feedback (~74%) for its well-structured curriculum, relevant skills development, and dedicated staff. Some criticism (~18%) points to program quality and instructor consistency.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
With a single review, this university is rated a perfect 5/5. The student highlighted excellent professors and abundant study resources. No negative feedback was received.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.
I was there as an exchange student from Europe, attending classes at Sauder Business School and the Mechanical Engineering Department. Studying at UBC is definitely a mixed bag in terms of the quality of education. I did have a few great professors who held wonderfully challenging and well-thought-out classes, making me feel that UBC punches above its weight in terms of educational quality. However, some other lectures were undoubtedly subpar. Grading seemed quite arbitrary at times (moving goalposts seems to be a recurring theme at UBC), and the lectures were not nearly as good as they should have been, in my opinion. It is quite fair to say that other exchange students and I were often shocked that UBC allows these courses to occur annually without making efforts to improve them. At UBC as a whole, less is expected from students than at my home university. I've seen people never show up to class and hold presentations that would never fly at my home uni. Professors seems to welcome all questions even if they are about things a fourth-year engineering student just months before graduation needs to know. I am not sure if UBC ensures that its graduates are adequately educated, and would definitely think twice if I was a recruiter and had to hire someone who attented there. From what I have seen, I would tentatively recommend Sauder Business School. For Mechanical Engineering (and probably also Electrical and Civil Engineering), UBC is simply too small, offering a lack of choices and not many lectures; usually, only introductory courses are offered for most topics. I recommend attending a more engineering/science-focused university, such as Waterloo or others in the US or Europe. It is quite astonishing how much money people pay to attend these subpar classes. Enjoyed having a beach on campus.
Hello everyone, I was enrolled at Fleming College in Peterborough, and I strongly recommend choosing another option. The professors here are extremely strict—some lock their doors as soon as class starts, refusing to let students in even if they are just a minute late. There is little flexibility or understanding from the faculty, making the learning experience frustrating. If you’re an international student, I strongly advise you to stay away. Many international students, including myself, have experienced racism from both students and professors. The lack of support and inclusivity makes it even harder to adjust. I wish someone had warned me before enrolling—I regret choosing this college and feel like I wasted my money. If I could do it again, I would have gone to Humber or Sheridan instead, where students are treated with more respect and consideration. If you’re looking for a supportive and welcoming learning environment, I highly suggest looking elsewhere.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
