Global Business University - Europe - GBU vs University of Nicosia - UNIC vs The American College of Cyprus vs Open University of Cyprus vs Cyprus International University
Side-by-side comparison from 107 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Helpful and supportive staff
- +Flexible and accessible education
- +Relevant and practical learning
- +Knowledgeable, supportive, and friendly professors
- +Practical, case-study-based learning approach
- +Well-organized courses with ample resources
- +Vibrant community and engaging living environment
- +Frequent and enjoyable campus events and activities
- +Flexible distance learning for work-life balance
- +High-quality course materials and faculty support
- +Accessible education for diverse students
- +Supportive and dedicated lecturers
- +Study-friendly environment and resources
- +Comprehensive program offerings
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -A lack of support and unclear communication negatively impacts the student experience.
- -Infrequent and limited live sessions.
- -Outdated or insufficient course materials requiring external research.
- -Platform not consistently updated.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are often mentioned.
- -Inconsistent or poor teaching quality frustrates students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact learning.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality leads to student dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of communication and support from faculty and staff is a problem.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, including Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all receiving strong scores around 4.67. Professors also earned a high mark of 4.67. The university's Facilities and Location received solid ratings of 4, while Accomodation scored slightly higher at 4.33. The weakest area, relative to its highest scores, appears to be Facilities and Location.
Overall, the university demonstrates strong performance in several key areas. Professors and Internationality received particularly high marks, indicating excellent academic and global engagement. Location and Value also scored well. The weakest area appears to be Facilities, though Student Life and Accomodation also scored slightly lower than the top categories.
This institution exhibits a strong overall performance, with particular excellence in Location, Student Life, and Internationality, all receiving a high 4.5 rating. Facilities and Professors are also well-regarded at 4. Value for money is rated at a solid 4. The weakest area is Accomodation, with a rating of 3.5, though still meeting a reasonable standard.
Remarkably, this institution achieves perfect scores across all evaluated aspects. Every category, from facilities and professors to student life and accommodation, received a 5-star rating. The university excels equally in location, internationality, and value, indicating a consistently excellent experience for its students. No single area stands out as weaker; all facets demonstrate outstanding performance.
Across various aspects, this institution garners a generally positive reception. Internationality stands out as its strongest area with a rating of 4.4, closely followed by professors at 4.3. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest point, scoring 3.857. Other areas like facilities, location, student life, and value also received solid scores, indicating a well-rounded university experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a 4.67 average rating from three reviews, students highly recommend the university, citing helpful staff and flexible programs. Approximately 0% of feedback was negative.
With an average rating of 4.03/5 from 71 reviews, ~99% of feedback is positive. Students praise knowledgeable, supportive, and friendly lecturers, a practical learning approach with case studies, and well-organized courses with ample resources. One negative review mentioned insufficient live sessions and outdated platform content.
With an average rating of 4/5, student reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight a vibrant community with frequent events and seasonal celebrations, making it an engaging and recommendable living environment.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, praising the university's flexibility for distance learners and excellent course materials and faculty support. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive, with no negative reviews.
Students highly recommend this university, praising its study-friendly environment and supportive lecturers who ensure understanding. Excellent services and facilities like a large library and labs also contribute to a positive experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I previously studied for an undergraduate degree with The Cyprus Institute of Marketing (BVI) through a local center in Uganda – Center for International Studies. I then decided to continue my studies in 2017 with a graduate degree and opted to do the MSc in Fraud Auditing
UNIC is indeed UNIQUE in all areas. The lecturers are highly trained professors who are grounded in their respective fields. Apart from being grounded, they are friendly, accommodating and down-to-earth.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
While I appreciate the academic environment at my university, a notable drawback for me as a master's student is the limited emphasis on practical projects, research opportunities, and presentations. Instead of fostering a more hands-on approach, the curriculum leans towards examinations, mirroring the structure of undergraduate programs. I believe a greater balance between theoretical assessments and practical application would better prepare us for the demands of our respective fields and enhance the overall learning experienceI recommend that the university reevaluate the structure of the master's program to incorporate more practical elements such as projects, research opportunities, and presentations. Balancing theoretical assessments with hands-on experiences would better align the curriculum with the expectations of advanced-level education, providing master's students with a more comprehensive skill set for their future endeavors.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
