University of Münster - WWU vs IU International University of Applied Sciences vs PFH Private University of Applied Sciences vs TU Dresden vs Dresden University of Applied Sciences - HTW Dresden
Side-by-side comparison from 195 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Flexible, interdisciplinary study options
- +Accessible and helpful professors
- +Strong program organization and administration
- +Flexible online study for work-life balance
- +Modern, intuitive digital platform for easy access
- +Relevant, high-quality educational content
- +Practical focus and dual study programs
- +Approachable instructors and small classes
- +Strong soft skills development
- +Excellent academic programs and intellectual challenge
- +Strong practical application and hands-on learning
- +Supportive environment and vibrant campus life
- +Excellent location and transport
- +Supportive professors and staff
- +Practical and industry-focused learning
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Supportive and well-organized academic environment
- +International and diverse community
- +Interactive and engaging learning approach
- +Focus on personal growth and development
- -Overly theoretical courses and outdated lectures lack practical application.
- -Focus on abstract academic details over real-world relevance.
- -Slow and unresponsive administrative processes, including grade processing and student support.
- -Poor staff attitude and lack of accountability for errors in student records and applications.
- -Inadequate support and guidance for online students.
- -Disappointing academic quality and hidden extra costs.
- -Overloaded modules and excessive study hours detract from learning time.
- -Poor translation of lecture materials hinders understanding.
- -Inconsistent teaching with multiple professors per module creates confusion.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Communication breakdowns and a perceived lack of student support are common complaints.
- -Lack of extracurricular activities and limited internship/job opportunities.
- -Poor campus environment and student engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequent sources of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -A lack of clarity or support regarding curriculum and academic expectations is a common complaint.
This institution receives its highest marks in **Location**, with a rating of 4.1. Student Life and Internationality are also strong points, both scoring 3.9. Conversely, the **Accomodation** is rated the lowest at 3.44. Facilities, Professors, and Value are all rated moderately well, clustered around 3.6 to 3.7, indicating a generally positive but not outstanding performance in these areas.
This institution garners notable praise in several key areas, with **Internationality** and **Professors** receiving particularly high scores. The **Value** proposition is also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect. Other aspects like Facilities, Location, and Student Life fall within a more moderate range of positive feedback.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its location, which received a high rating. However, areas requiring significant improvement include accommodation and student life, both receiving the lowest scores. Other aspects like facilities, professors, internationality, and value fall within a moderate to low range.
Considering various aspects of the university experience, the location stands out with an exceptional rating. Facilities and value also received high marks, indicating strengths in these areas. Student life and accommodation were rated similarly positive. While professors and internationality were rated slightly lower, they still represent solid performance. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded profile with particular excellence in its surroundings and practical resources.
A comprehensive review reveals a generally strong performance across various university aspects. The location stands out as the highest-rated area, indicating a particularly advantageous setting. While most categories, including facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, and value, received excellent scores, internationality emerged as the comparatively weakest, though still a respectable 4. This suggests a positive overall experience with room for growth in global engagement.
This university garners its highest marks for **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving a near-perfect score. **Professors** are also highly rated, reflecting strong academic quality. The university's **Value** and **Student Life** also score well. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, followed by **Facilities**, indicating room for improvement in these aspects of the student experience.
Evaluations reveal a strong academic offering, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.91. **Location** also scores exceptionally well at 4.83. The university demonstrates good performance in **Student Life** (4.58) and **Internationality** (4.56), with **Value** also rated favorably at 4.56. **Facilities** are rated at 4.45, and **Accomodation** stands out as the area with the lowest score at 4.29.
With a 4.09 average rating, ~82% of reviews are positive, highlighting flexible programs, excellent mentorship, and a great atmosphere. A small ~9% of feedback is negative, citing overly theoretical courses.
~95% of reviews are positive, praising flexibility, modern platforms, and accessible materials. A small percentage (~5%) mention issues with grading delays and slow administrative support.
With an average rating of 3/5, student feedback is split, with roughly 50% positive and 50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical programs and accessible instructors, while negative reviews criticize a perceived lack of substance behind marketing efforts and unexpected costs.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 12 reviews, ~75% are positive, highlighting excellent programs, engaging learning, and good facilities. A small ~8% of feedback was negative, citing demanding workloads and translation issues.
All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students highlight good location, helpful staff, and practical, industry-focused education. Dining facilities and class sizes are also praised.
With an average rating of 4.57/5 from 14 reviews, ~93% are positive, praising diverse classes, educators, and global peer networks. A single negative review (~7%) found it suitable only for those seeking an easy degree with limited extracurriculars.
With an average rating of 4.66/5 from 32 reviews, students praise Forward College's enriching international environment and innovative, interactive teaching methods. Personal and academic growth are frequently highlighted.
Studied in WWU Münster in IS. The education is far from a practical field, the courses are too theoretical and far from a real business perspective. Most of the lectures are outdated and boring. Professors and Ph.ds stress mostly about how do you write the exposé, which synonyms do you use but don't give any clue about how your thesis can be applied in the real world. So, be prepared for constant iterations of changing your master thesis with different wording. If you want to finish your studies in 2 years, prepare yourself for studying only. In my humble opinion, the university is over ranked and it's too conservative. Won't recommend to internationals or germans with head on their shoulders. Also, if you want to get your degree, prepare to wait for almost 2 months. The university is so "progressive", that they will provide you a piece of paper within 2 months, not earlier (already advise them to use docusign or similar software, but they are too lazy and lame).... If you want to get a student wohnheim room - prepare to spend a lot of time in "Studierendenwerk", where they don't want to give good apartments/rooms in the first meet. They even won't speak English with you.
My experience with IU is very wonderful and exceptional. The learning process is smooth and easy especially for online students and the exams are well tailored to test your knowledge on what you have been learning. It is quite great indeed.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.
