University of Ljubljana vs University of Ljubljana Faculty of Computer and Information Science vs University of Guelph-Humber - GH vs NTF-Faculty of Natural Sciences and Engineering vs IEDC-Bled School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 73 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Challenging and interdisciplinary programs
- +Supportive and approachable professors
- +Welcoming environment and personal development opportunities
- +Approachable and skilled professors with interesting and relevant courses.
- +Modern facilities and flexible curriculum allowing student choice.
- +Good balance of theory and practical learning with organized student activities.
- +Supportive professors and a close-knit community
- +Small class sizes with hands-on learning
- +Beneficial co-op placements and modern facilities
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Knowledgeable, approachable professors
- +Well-structured classes and hands-on labs
- +Modern campus with great facilities
- -Communication and transparency issues
- -Lack of challenging assignments and exams
- -Limited social interaction between faculties
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in poor condition.
- -The cost of attendance is perceived as too high for the value received.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a common complaint.
- -Students experience frustration with administrative and management inefficiencies.
- -A lack of engaging and relevant curriculum is frequently mentioned.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling lost.
Student feedback indicates a well-rounded university experience, with **Location** and **Student Life** receiving the highest marks. Professors also earned strong praise. Conversely, **Internationality** was rated the lowest among the surveyed aspects, suggesting room for improvement in global engagement. Other areas like Facilities, Accommodation, and Value were rated moderately well.
This institution excels in its facilities, boasting an impressive rating of 4.67. Student life and value for money are also highly regarded, both scoring 4.33. Conversely, the university's internationality received the lowest marks at 3.67, with location also appearing as a comparatively weaker area at 3.83. Professors and accommodation were rated moderately at 4.
With a diverse set of ratings, the institution excels in its **Facilities**, earning a strong 4.31. **Professors** and **Value** also received commendable scores, indicating robust academic and economic benefits. Conversely, **Student Life** and **Internationality** received the lowest marks, suggesting these areas could benefit from further development. **Location** and **Accomodation** sit comfortably in the middle range of evaluations.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university receives strong marks in several key areas, notably achieving a perfect score for its **Location** and excellent ratings for **Value** and **Professors**. Facilities and student life also score well. Accommodation represents the weakest aspect, with a rating of 3, indicating potential areas for improvement in student housing options. Internationality and facilities are rated favorably at 4.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 50 reviews, ~94% praise academically challenging programs, interdisciplinary collaboration, and supportive professors. One review found assignments and exams unchallenging.
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100% of 6 reviews), with an average rating of 4.17/5. Students praise modern facilities, skilled and approachable professors, and relevant, balanced courses. Some note a high workload.
With an average rating of 4.25/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise informative teaching, beneficial advice, and small class sizes that foster close relationships with professors. Modern facilities, inclusive community, and co-op opportunities are also highlighted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The single review for the Veterinary Medicine program is overwhelmingly positive (100%), with a 4/5 average rating. Strengths highlighted include knowledgeable professors, well-structured classes, engaging lab sessions, modern facilities, and a student-friendly city.
The university offered strong academics with some of the best professors and researchers in the country. Some proffessors did take a lot of academic liberty though, but that did contribute to the overall student experience. Ljubljana is an amazing student city, very welcoming, safe and warm, but houseng opportunities can scarce.
Nothing to show
The Media and Communications professors are lovely, and I've rarely had a problem with bad professors. A few frustrating ones, but never outright bad in my eyes. The classes are fine, though a bit boring in the 3rd year, and I find myself using the extra time for personal projects or reading.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
