University of Ljubljana vs Tokyo Metropolitan University - TMU vs University of Ljubljana Faculty of Computer and Information Science vs NTF-Faculty of Natural Sciences and Engineering vs IEDC-Bled School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 56 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High academic standards and expert, approachable professors
- +Human-centered approach and good professor-student relationships
- +Quality, interesting programs with practical elements
- +English-taught programs & international student support
- +High-quality research & academic rigor
- +Convenient location & exchange opportunities
- +Approachable and skilled professors with interesting and relevant courses.
- +Modern facilities and flexible curriculum allowing student choice.
- +Good balance of theory and practical learning with organized student activities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Knowledgeable, approachable professors
- +Well-structured classes and hands-on labs
- +Modern campus with great facilities
- -Fragmented campus layout hindering community.
- -Lack of academic challenge in assignments and exams.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
- -Lack of engagement and uninspiring teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in poor condition.
- -The cost of attendance is perceived as too high for the value received.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling lost.
This university demonstrates particular strengths in its **Location**, achieving a high rating of 4.55, and **Student Life**, with a score of 4.4125. The **Value** proposition is also well-regarded at 4.173. Conversely, the university's **Internationality** received the lowest rating at 3.365, suggesting this area could benefit from further development. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, and Accommodation fall within a moderate to good range.
This institution garners exceptional marks for its **facilities** and **professors**, both receiving a near-perfect 4.7. The **location** also scores highly at 4.5. However, **student life** and **accommodation** present significant areas for improvement, with ratings of 3.2 and 2.5 respectively. **Internationality** and **value** fall in the middle range, both at 3.5.
This institution excels in its facilities, boasting an impressive rating of 4.67. Student life and value for money are also highly regarded, both scoring 4.33. Conversely, the university's internationality received the lowest marks at 3.67, with location also appearing as a comparatively weaker area at 3.83. Professors and accommodation were rated moderately at 4.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university receives strong marks in several key areas, notably achieving a perfect score for its **Location** and excellent ratings for **Value** and **Professors**. Facilities and student life also score well. Accommodation represents the weakest aspect, with a rating of 3, indicating potential areas for improvement in student housing options. Internationality and facilities are rated favorably at 4.
Nearly 98% of reviews are positive, highlighting high academic standards, approachable professors, and good student-teacher relationships. One negative review found assignments and exams not challenging.
Based on one review, this university has a high average rating of 4/5. Students appreciate the excellent research quality and English-taught programs, with ~100% positive feedback.
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100% of 6 reviews), with an average rating of 4.17/5. Students praise modern facilities, skilled and approachable professors, and relevant, balanced courses. Some note a high workload.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The single review for the Veterinary Medicine program is overwhelmingly positive (100%), with a 4/5 average rating. Strengths highlighted include knowledgeable professors, well-structured classes, engaging lab sessions, modern facilities, and a student-friendly city.
The university offered strong academics with some of the best professors and researchers in the country. Some proffessors did take a lot of academic liberty though, but that did contribute to the overall student experience. Ljubljana is an amazing student city, very welcoming, safe and warm, but houseng opportunities can scarce.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show