TBS Education - TBS vs ESSEC Business School vs Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua - UACH vs Metropolitan University Sylhet vs Cadi Ayyad University Marrakesh
Side-by-side comparison from 164 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Challenging curriculum, critical thinking encouragement
- +Diverse and international student body
- +Active student life and associations
- +High-quality, knowledgeable professors
- +Strong academic rigor and valuable skill development
- +Welcoming environment with good campus facilities and opportunities
- +Great teachers and well-prepared faculty
- +Good campus facilities and large university size
- +Opportunities for participation in sports
- +Outstanding quality of classes and lectures
- +Helpful courses for long-term goals
- +Supportive teachers and focus-conducive facilities
- +Supportive & approachable professors
- +Wide range of academic programs & specializations
- +Calm, focused academic environment with practical learning
- +Strong employability support and career readiness.
- +Relevant and up-to-date academic programs.
- +Professional and accommodating faculty.
Nothing to show
- -Unorganized administration and lack of early information.
- -Administrative and management issues are frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and poor accommodation are common complaints.
- -Location is inconvenient and perceived as unsafe at night.
- -Outdated and dirty facilities are a major concern.
- -Poor teaching quality is frequently mentioned.
- -Lack of international presence is a drawback.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often seen as insufficient or irrelevant.
- -Outdated and poor-quality facilities are a significant drawback.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unreliable instructors are frustrating.
- -Lack of new hires and outdated faculty negatively impacts the student experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency regarding school policies and decisions.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources for modern learning.
- -Unsupportive or inaccessible administrative and teaching staff.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in student life, which received the highest rating. Professors and internationality also scored very well, indicating positive experiences in these areas. While all aspects received favorable marks, the location was rated slightly lower than other categories, suggesting it may be the weakest area in comparison to the university's other offerings.
This university receives commendable feedback, with Internationality standing out as its strongest aspect, achieving a high rating. Student Life and Value also perform very well, indicating a positive experience and good return on investment for students. Conversely, Location and Accommodation are areas where the university is rated less favorably, suggesting potential for improvement in these particular domains.
Assessing this institution reveals a mixed performance across key areas. The university excels in its **location**, receiving a high rating. Conversely, **accommodation** and **internationality** are identified as areas needing significant improvement, scoring lowest. Ratings for **facilities**, **professors**, and **student life** fall in the mid-range, while **value** also receives a moderate score.
This institution achieves excellent scores in several key areas, notably in student life, location, and professor quality, all rated 4.75. Internationality and value also received strong marks. The weakest area for the university is accommodation, with a rating of 3.33. Facilities are rated a solid 4.
This institution demonstrates a mixed performance across various aspects. Location stands out as a strength, receiving a strong rating of 4. Conversely, facilities represent the weakest area, scoring a 3. Other categories, including professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, fall within a moderate range, suggesting areas for potential improvement alongside recognized strengths.
This institution demonstrates a strong performance in its location, receiving a perfect score of 5. Professors are also highly rated at 4.5. Conversely, facilities and student life are areas with moderate ratings at 3. Accommodations and internationality sit comfortably in the mid-range. The overall value of the university is positively assessed at 4.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.15/5 from 93 reviews, ~99% are positive. Students praise excellent academics, experienced instructors, and active student life. A small amount of negative feedback notes disorganization.
With a 4.45 average rating from 49 reviews, ~94% of feedback is positive, praising knowledgeable professors, excellent financial support, and enriching academic environments. A small portion (~2%) noted location and accommodation concerns.
About 43% of reviews are positive, citing good teachers and campus facilities. However, ~14% of feedback highlights issues with unprepared teachers in specific faculties and a lack of student housing.
With an average rating of 4.25/5, approximately 75% of student feedback is positive. Recurring themes highlight outstanding classes and programs that align with career goals. A small amount of feedback noted slightly longer class times.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting approachable professors, a calm academic environment, and practical learning opportunities. A small portion of feedback, about 11.1%, notes occasional teacher unreliability and poor facilities.
With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight satisfaction with employability services, workshops, and career preparation. Some note challenges with off-campus accommodation and limited campus activities.
Nothing to show
I think gives great exchange opportunities and the possibility to share an international and dynamic environment. Activities seem well balanced but I believe there is some inconveniences with administrative processes.
Essec BBA is a well known program if you want to attend a business school. The teaching is qualitative as the teachers usually are reputed experts in their fields. As far as it concerns the campus, you cannot complain about the diversity and quality of high tech equipment or the comfortable auditoriums. Pretty much everything is made for you to feel at ease and evolve as an ESSEC student. One of the rare things I could point out is the school campus location which is pretty much isolated and a bit far from the centre of Paris, otherwise, you can take public transport, easy to use and practical for your everyday student life.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The program has been tailored to accommodate the ever-changing world of tech and fully equips pupils with the relevant industry specific knowledge they require as well as a broadened perspective on a plethora of subjects through electives and workshops. The campus is very small and there are very few activities to participate in. This makes the school-life balance hard to maintain as the semester is very intensive and requires consistent study. The lecturers are very professional, accommodating, eager to help and approachable.
Nothing to show
