TBS Education - TBS vs Universitatea de Medicina si Farm 'Carol Davila' - UMFCD - UMFCD vs Ibn Zohr University vs ESSEC Business School vs EMAA Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 155 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Challenging curriculum, critical thinking encouragement
- +Diverse and international student body
- +Active student life and associations
- +Competent and approachable teaching staff
- +Ample practical clinical experience opportunities
- +Easy access to information
- +Helpful and supportive professors
- +Practical and understandable programs
- +Value for money
- +High-quality, knowledgeable professors
- +Strong academic rigor and valuable skill development
- +Welcoming environment with good campus facilities and opportunities
Nothing to show
- -Unorganized administration and lack of early information.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources impede learning.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues, including a lack of funds and transparency, negatively impact student experience and facilities.
- -Outdated curriculum and insufficient resources hinder teachers from providing optimal education.
- -Administrative and management issues are frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and poor accommodation are common complaints.
- -Location is inconvenient and perceived as unsafe at night.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in student life, which received the highest rating. Professors and internationality also scored very well, indicating positive experiences in these areas. While all aspects received favorable marks, the location was rated slightly lower than other categories, suggesting it may be the weakest area in comparison to the university's other offerings.
Campus ratings reveal a university with a particularly strong location, scoring a high 4.43. Student life also received positive marks at 4.1, and value for money was rated well at 4.25. Accommodation and internationality were moderate, both around 3.6-3.75. The weakest areas, comparatively, are facilities and professors, with scores of 3.12 and 3.27 respectively, indicating room for improvement in these departments.
Overall, the university presents a varied rating profile. The strongest areas are **Value** (3.71), **Professors** (3.57), and **Location** (3.57), indicating positive perceptions in these aspects. Conversely, **Student Life** (2.43) emerges as the weakest area. **Facilities** (3.14) and **Accommodation** (2.86) also fall in the mid-range, with **Internationality** (2.86) performing similarly to accommodation.
This university receives commendable feedback, with Internationality standing out as its strongest aspect, achieving a high rating. Student Life and Value also perform very well, indicating a positive experience and good return on investment for students. Conversely, Location and Accommodation are areas where the university is rated less favorably, suggesting potential for improvement in these particular domains.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.15/5 from 93 reviews, ~99% are positive. Students praise excellent academics, experienced instructors, and active student life. A small amount of negative feedback notes disorganization.
Reviews are predominantly positive (~100%), highlighting valuable and enriching experiences, competent and approachable teaching staff, and good access to information and clinical practice. Some mention slightly outdated teaching systems.
Approximately 43% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical skills and approachable professors. While ~14% of feedback is negative, mentioning issues with resources and facilities, the average rating is 3.43/5.
With a 4.45 average rating from 49 reviews, ~94% of feedback is positive, praising knowledgeable professors, excellent financial support, and enriching academic environments. A small portion (~2%) noted location and accommodation concerns.
Nothing to show
I think gives great exchange opportunities and the possibility to share an international and dynamic environment. Activities seem well balanced but I believe there is some inconveniences with administrative processes.
The university is considered one of the finest medical training institutions in the country. Not sure whether because of the quality itself, or the lack of competition. There are some great, dedicated teachers, who are willing to help students and pass down their knowledge but there are at least just as many uninterested, sloppy teachers. One can find great people and future peers, but also a lot of favoritism and toxic competition.
Nothing to show
Essec BBA is a well known program if you want to attend a business school. The teaching is qualitative as the teachers usually are reputed experts in their fields. As far as it concerns the campus, you cannot complain about the diversity and quality of high tech equipment or the comfortable auditoriums. Pretty much everything is made for you to feel at ease and evolve as an ESSEC student. One of the rare things I could point out is the school campus location which is pretty much isolated and a bit far from the centre of Paris, otherwise, you can take public transport, easy to use and practical for your everyday student life.
Nothing to show
