Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ vs Pavol Jozef Šafárik University - UPJS vs University of North Carolina at Charlotte - UNCC vs IPAG Business School vs Artevelde University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 94 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Holistic and diverse academic programs.
- +Excellent professors and personal/professional growth.
- +Beautiful campus and vibrant student community.
- +Rigorous and demanding academic programs
- +Professors’ high standards and supportive guidance
- +Preparation for future career success
- +excellent quality education and teaching
- +friendly atmosphere and supportive community
- +abundant campus resources and facilities
- +Experienced and supportive faculty, focused on student well-being and professional development.
- +Program relevance to career goals, practical experience, and adaptability to student feedback.
- +Welcoming and inclusive environment, fostering a sense of community and individual value.
- +Practical, real-world relevant programmes
- +Approachable and helpful lecturers
- +Enriching international opportunities and campus life
Nothing to show
- +Engaging teachers and diverse study programs
- +Welcoming environment with international students and helpful staff
- +Excellent facilities and valuable global opportunities
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
- -Administrative inefficiencies and poor management cause frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major issue.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently criticized.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or not adequately preparing students for the real world.
- -Lack of support for personal crises.
- -Inflexible policies for challenging circumstances.
- -Poor response to student well-being concerns.
- -Unprofessional coordination and administrative issues.
- -Low academic quality and unfulfilled course offerings.
- -Poor student support and delayed essential documentation.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
Nothing to show
- -Frustrating administrative and management issues create significant roadblocks.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and a disconnect between staff and students cause dissatisfaction.
Students generally hold the university in high regard, with excellent scores for Student Life (4.36) and Location (4.32). Facilities also received a strong rating of 4.32. While professors (4.27) and internationality (4.14) are also well-received, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area with a rating of 3.88. Value for money is rated a respectable 4.10.
This institution demonstrates a solid overall performance. Areas excelling include Professors (4.5) and Accommodation (4), alongside strong showings in Facilities and Internationality (both 4). Conversely, Location received the lowest rating at 3, with Student Life not far behind at 3.5, indicating these aspects may offer the most room for improvement.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its internationality, earning a high rating of 4.6. Facilities are also highly regarded, scoring 4.4. The university also receives positive marks for its professors and student life. However, accommodation stands out as a weaker area, with a rating of 3.4, while value for money is moderately rated at 3.8.
An analysis of the university's ratings reveals a distinct pattern, with **Location** standing out as the strongest area, scoring a near-perfect 4.7. Areas such as **Student Life** and **Internationality** also received strong marks, both at 3.87. Conversely, **Accomodation** represents the weakest aspect, with a rating of 3.25, closely followed by **Facilities** at 3.44. Professors and Value are rated moderately well.
Considering the provided ratings, the university excels in **Location**, receiving a perfect 4.5. **Internationality** and **Student Life** also score highly, both above 4.2. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** represent the weaker points, with scores of approximately 3.9 and 3.8 respectively. Ratings for **Professors** and **Value** are solid, sitting at around 4.16 and 4.
Nothing to show
This institution receives exceptionally high ratings, achieving a perfect score in five key areas: Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Accommodation. Areas of slightly lower, yet still very strong, performance include Internationality and Value, both scoring 4.5 out of 5. Overall, the university demonstrates a remarkably consistent and excellent performance across all evaluated aspects.
With an average rating of 4.42/5, ~92% of reviews are positive. Students praise the university's holistic curriculum, excellent professors, and opportunities for personal and professional growth. No negative feedback was reported.
With an average rating of 4/5, the ~100% of positive feedback highlights a strict but ultimately beneficial university experience. Students feel professors' demanding nature prepared them well for their careers.
With an average rating of 4/5, ~83% of reviewers are positive, highlighting phenomenal resources and a pleasant, diverse atmosphere conducive to learning. ~17% of feedback mentioned a lack of accommodation during difficult experiences.
~82% of reviews are positive, highlighting good programs, attentive staff, and a welcoming environment. A small portion (~18%) mentions issues with course delivery, coordination, and administrative support.
With 42 positive reviews out of 48, students highly praise dynamic and practical courses, helpful lecturers, and valuable real-life skills. There are no negative reviews.
Nothing to show
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with a 5/5 average rating. Students praise the variety of study programs, friendly staff, and excellent facilities like classrooms and the library. Lunch options are also highlighted as very good.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The people that are supposed to help you at IPAG are not going to do it, and if they do it would take as long as they want it to take, for example, I tried to renew my visa with the university because they told me like that was easier and it took 8 months in the process, my visa got expired, I almost got kicked out of the country and I ended up doing the process myself. Besides this, I just graduated this year on august and as well as all my classmates we have been trying to get our certificates and our grades in order to start to work or to continue our postgraduate studies but they just don't want to give us all this. IPAG is not a university with organization and neither who cares about their students, just about your money. If you are foreign you will get to know people from all the world and you will have a good experience but you can do this also at any other university in europe and you would be way more taken in count.
I like how you can directly talk to teachers without feeling like there's this hierarchy. I dislike how unorganised things can be such as: poor communication, poor planning: last minute timing etc.... Having a decent study track coach really helps with everything, because this is the individual that knows a lot about your study progress and who you are normally the most in contact with. Which in my case helped me a lot with all types of processes. Such as: admin work, advice on academic goals, future goals related to academia etc... The negative point for Artevelde would also be that they do not provide any parking for students. Therefore, students have to pay a hefty amount to park their car on the street(s) near campus. Meanwhile other universities/hogeschool in Ghent do provide plenty of this. I'd call it absolute greed because they are more than able to provide, instead they like to hoard the parking spaces. For the language courses, there should be more options than the ones they offer, because the major I'm in (international organisation and management) is full of international students and not everyone wants to study: French, Dutch, Spanish or German.... there should be more options... The other issue in my opinion would be that Artevelde is a "Applied Sciences school" which means, if you want to obtain a master degree afterwards, you can't just directly study one, when you're in Belgium or most of the neighbouring countries, you'd have to do a bridging year (a prep year).
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
