Université Paris-Sorbonne vs SKEMA Business School vs EDHEC Business School vs Excelia Business School vs ESSCA School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 247 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High academic quality and rigor
- +Engaging and enriching learning experience
- +Positive campus environment and student activities
- +Strong international exposure and campus network
- +Practical, up-to-date curriculum with business application
- +Valuable career support and alumni network
- +Rigorous academic and practical preparation for careers
- +Strong alumni network and career services support
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +Supportive, approachable professors and strong emphasis on practical, real-world business applications.
- +Diverse, international environment fostering personal growth and unforgettable shared experiences.
- +Opportunities for teamwork, self-discovery, and engaging learning through case studies and projects.
- +Practical, experiential learning with real-world application.
- +Strong international focus, diversity, and global opportunities.
- +Supportive faculty and high-quality teaching.
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
- -Administrative and management issues create constant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are significant drawbacks.
- -Lack of support and unhelpful staff lead to student frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt academic progress.
- -Poor communication and guidance hinder student career goals.
- -Concerns exist regarding faculty conduct and focus on profit over education.
- -High tuition fees and perceived low return on investment.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty are prevalent complaints.
- -Expensive tuition for irrelevant courses and unqualified instructors.
- -Lack of student motivation and engagement in academics.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
This institution garners strong ratings across several key areas. Its location is exceptionally well-regarded, alongside excellent scores for professors, internationality, and overall value. While facilities and accommodation also receive solid marks, student life stands out as the weakest area compared to the other surveyed aspects.
This institution shows impressive strengths in its academic and international components, with Professors receiving a high rating of 4.42 and Internationality scoring 4.37. Location and Facilities are also well-regarded, both above 4.20. However, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a score of 3.57, significantly lower than other categories. Student Life and Value are rated moderately, around 4.10 and 4.04 respectively.
Academic and student experience aspects generally receive positive marks, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.41. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area at 3.14, indicating room for improvement in this regard. Location and Student Life are moderately rated, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in those domains.
This university garners an impressive average rating of 4.19. Its strongest areas are **Internationality** (4.57) and **Student Life** (4.34), indicating a vibrant and globally connected campus environment. **Facilities** (4.24) and **Location** (4.27) also score very well. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, receiving a rating of 3.74, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect.
This institution garners particularly high marks for Student Life, averaging over 4.16, with Location also scoring well at 4.08. Professors and Internationality are also rated positively at a solid 4.0. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, receiving a 3.25 rating, while Facilities and Value are mid-range.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 12 reviews, ~83% of feedback is positive, highlighting strong academic rigor and interesting content. No negative feedback was reported.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90%), highlighting great faculty, strong international opportunities, and practical curriculum beneficial for careers. A small percentage (~3%) reported issues with management, communication, and program organization.
With a 4.24/5 average, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense courses, strong alumni networks, and excellent career services. A small percentage of feedback mentioned high tuition fees.
The reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), highlighting excellent professors, practical courses, and a strong international environment. Students appreciate teamwork opportunities and the school's ability to foster personal growth and unforgettable experiences.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising practical and international teaching, supportive staff, and a great environment. One review (around 8%) expressed dissatisfaction with course relevance and teaching quality.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
The university is very good, professors are very well experienced in their respective domain. Its located in the center of Paris, it's very accessible to all types of students. But we have to improve more in the life of students, but its good at all.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
Nothing to show
ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture
