Université Paris-Sorbonne vs University of Novi Sad - UNS vs Riga style and fashion vocational school - RSMT vs University of Stuttgart vs Rivne State Humanitarian University

Side-by-side comparison from 80 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Université Paris-Sorbonne: wins 0/4 categories
University of Novi Sad - UNS: wins 1/4 categories
Riga style and fashion vocational school - RSMT: wins 0/4 categories
University of Stuttgart: wins 0/4 categories
Rivne State Humanitarian University: wins 0/4 categories
Toronto School of Management: wins 3/4 categories
Tecmilenio University: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Applied Statistics
Best programme: Applied Computer Science
Stuttgart, Germany
3.90
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Architecture
Best programme: Cybersecurity
Mexico City, Mexico
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Industrial Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.00
Not rated
3.88
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.40
4.80
Not rated
4.13
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.27
4.15
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Internationality
4.27
3.66
Not rated
4.25
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Student life
3.90
4.73
Win
Not rated
4.13
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.27
4.22
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Accommodation
3.91
3.80
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
4.00
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Professional and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Enriching academic experience with interesting and mind-opening topics
  • +Positive and memorable campus environment and activities
  • +Diverse programs and specialization options
  • +Practical skills and internship opportunities
  • +Accessible professors and good facilities

Nothing to show

  • +High quality of education and contemporary curriculum.
  • +Commitment of professors and strong academic programs.
  • +Diverse student body and international environment.
  • +Intelligent specialists and creative personalities broaden horizons.
  • +Industry-aligned courses and practical, hands-on learning
  • +Partnerships with tech companies and real-world application
  • +Flexible executive plan accommodates work and study
  • +Supportive professors and coordinators
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Communication and transparency are lacking.
  • -Outdated materials and faculty, coupled with a lack of practical application.
  • -High tuition fees are a significant concern given the perceived value.
  • -Limited career prospects in the field after graduation.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated system and ineffective career support.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are significant problems.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant course material disappoints students.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring complaint.
  • -Lack of adequate support, both academic and personal, is a significant concern.
Rating summary
What students say

With a solid overall profile, this institution excels in its **Location**, earning a high score of 4.4. Professors and value also stand out, both receiving ratings of 4.28. The weakest areas appear to be **Student Life** and **Accommodation**, each scoring 3.9. Facilities and internationality also received strong, positive ratings.

Overall, this university garners positive feedback, particularly excelling in Location and Student Life, both receiving scores close to 4.8. Professors and Value also received strong marks. However, areas for improvement are evident in Accomodation and Internationality, which received the lowest ratings among the surveyed categories.

Nothing to show

This institution garners impressive scores in several key areas, with Internationality (4.225) and Location (4.1625) being particularly well-regarded. Student Life also receives a solid rating (4.125). Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.4625, while Facilities (3.9375) and Professors (3.9625) are rated competently. Value for money is also strong at 3.975.

Across all surveyed aspects, the university received uniformly average ratings. Its strongest and weakest areas are indistinguishable, as every category—Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value—scored identically. This consistent performance suggests no particular standout strengths or weaknesses are evident based on this assessment.

Exceptional scores in multiple categories highlight this university's strengths. Professors, location, internationality, and value all received a perfect 5, indicating outstanding academic quality, accessibility, global outlook, and affordability. Facilities, student life, and accommodation also scored well with 4s, suggesting a solid, well-rounded university experience. No areas received below average ratings.

This institution shines in two key areas: receiving top marks for its professors and its value. Conversely, the university faces significant challenges, with facilities, location, student life, and accommodation all receiving the lowest possible ratings. Its internationality is a mid-range strength, scoring a respectable four out of five.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.23/5, ~85% of reviews are positive, highlighting professional faculty and great experiences. Negative feedback is minimal, with no 1-2 star ratings.

With an average rating of 4.24/5, ~74% of 54 reviews are positive, praising the beautiful campus, diverse programs, and student opportunities. A single negative review mentioned difficult faculty and outdated materials.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.9/5 from 10 reviews, ~80% are positive, highlighting quality education and strong PhD programs, with many international students. ~10% of feedback is negative, citing bureaucracy and job prospects.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the sole review highlights intelligent specialists and creative personalities that diversify outlooks. No negative feedback was recorded.

The sole review is highly positive (5/5 stars), praising the school's industry-aligned courses and practical training. There are no negative reviews.

The sole review is highly positive, with ~100% of feedback rating 5/5. Students highlight the flexibility of executive programs and supportive professors/coordinators. No negative feedback was received.

Rating distribution
5★
38%
46%
0%
20%
100%
100%
100%
4★
46%
33%
0%
60%
0%
0%
0%
3★
15%
19%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
2%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Sorbonne- The real quality of studies

The university is very good, professors are very well experienced in their respective domain. Its located in the center of Paris, it's very accessible to all types of students. But we have to improve more in the life of students, but its good at all.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Flexible programm

I study architecture and this study is structured in a different way in most universities. What I like about the University of Stuttgart is that after obtaining the broad and diverse basics of the study in the first 2 years, you have the freedom to choose your own seminars and projects, concentrating on your point of interest. You can also distribute them as you wish. This is a huge adventure in a field where praxis in an office next to the studies is so important. An international semester is foreseen as well which helps you develop enormously in personal and cultural way.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close