Concordia University vs School of Digital Arts, Animation and Design - NAD-UQAC vs École de technologie supérieure - ETS vs Academy of Aeronautics vs College CDI
Side-by-side comparison from 154 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical and relevant programs with knowledgeable professors
- +Inclusive and collaborative environment fostering entrepreneurialism
- +Engaging professors and diverse course offerings
- +Industry-relevant opportunities and professional preparation
- +Supportive and attentive faculty guidance
- +Lack of English support for international students
- +Limited scholarship opportunities for non-French speakers
- +Difficulty finding part-time employment
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
- -Ineffective teaching and poor exam quality are major concerns.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of student support are frustrating.
- -Unengaging lectures and difficult-to-understand instructors are prevalent issues.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant concern.
- -Poor communication and a lack of administrative support create frustration.
- -Overcrowded classrooms and insufficient individual attention hinder learning.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
- -The quality and relevance of the curriculum are often criticized.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.5. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, reflecting positive student experiences and perceived worth. The weakest area appears to be **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.944, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience.
Overall, the university scores well in several key areas. Its strongest aspects are professors, student life, and accommodation, all receiving top marks. Facilities and internationality are identified as areas with moderate ratings. The university also performs well in terms of location and value.
A notable strength of this institution is its prime **Location**, scoring a high 4.5. Conversely, **Student Life** presents a significant area for improvement, with a low rating of 1.5. The university also received solid ratings in **Professors** and **Value** (both 3.5), with **Facilities** and **Accomodation** averaging 3. **Internationality** sits in the middle at 2.5.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.
With a 4.29 average rating from 136 reviews, ~88% are positive, highlighting inclusivity, practical learning, and great professors. A small ~3% of feedback mentions issues with teacher clarity, exam quality, and unaccommodating professors.
With a 5/5 average rating, this university is highly regarded by students, who praise its industry opportunities and career preparation. ~100% of feedback is positive, highlighting supportive teachers.
With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, positive feedback comprises approximately 50% of the sentiment. Students highlight French language requirements and inflation as challenges, while one positive review commends the university for not requiring French for graduate students.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.
Concordia University's linguistics program is a well-rounded introduction to the field of study for any aspiring linguist. The required courses allow students to browse all areas of the field, ranging from syntax to historical linguistics. Once you find your niche within the program, you can pick and choose what to learn from the more advanced courses. My favorite course during my time in the program was a special topics class on Old Egyptian. Mark Hale, the incredible professor who taught the course, inspired my passion for classical languages. My only critique of the program is the lack of advertised resources pertaining to post-graduate endeavors in the field. More information shared on graduate studies might have been helpful early on in the program. In conclusion, Concordia University is a great institution as long as you're passionate about your studies and well-engaged in your program.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
