Concordia University vs Université de Montréal vs School of Digital Arts, Animation and Design - NAD-UQAC vs John Abbott College vs École de technologie supérieure - ETS
Side-by-side comparison from 190 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical and relevant programs with knowledgeable professors
- +Inclusive and collaborative environment fostering entrepreneurialism
- +Engaging professors and diverse course offerings
- +Engaging and knowledgeable professors
- +Diverse and challenging coursework
- +Hands-on learning and research opportunities
- +Industry-relevant opportunities and professional preparation
- +Supportive and attentive faculty guidance
- +Excellent facilities and a positive, historic campus atmosphere.
- +High-quality teaching and engaging, challenging academic programs.
- +Vibrant campus life with numerous extracurricular activities.
- +Lack of English support for international students
- +Limited scholarship opportunities for non-French speakers
- +Difficulty finding part-time employment
Nothing to show
- +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
- -Ineffective teaching and poor exam quality are major concerns.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of student support are frustrating.
- -Unengaging lectures and difficult-to-understand instructors are prevalent issues.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling lost.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant concern.
- -Poor communication and a lack of administrative support create frustration.
- -Overcrowded classrooms and insufficient individual attention hinder learning.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of support are frequently mentioned.
- -Lack of practical application and career relevance in coursework is a recurring concern.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
- -The quality and relevance of the curriculum are often criticized.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.5. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, reflecting positive student experiences and perceived worth. The weakest area appears to be **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.944, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience.
Evaluations indicate a generally positive university experience. Facilities and Professors received the highest marks, with strong scores also noted for Location and Value. Student Life and Internationality also performed well. Accommodations stand out as the lowest-rated area, though still receiving a respectable score. Overall, the university presents a solid offering across most aspects of student life and academics.
Overall, the university scores well in several key areas. Its strongest aspects are professors, student life, and accommodation, all receiving top marks. Facilities and internationality are identified as areas with moderate ratings. The university also performs well in terms of location and value.
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for **Facilities** and **Location**, alongside a strong showing in **Student Life**. However, areas for improvement are apparent in **Accomodation** and **Value**, both receiving a rating of 3. Ratings for **Professors** and **Internationality** fall in the upper-mid range.
A notable strength of this institution is its prime **Location**, scoring a high 4.5. Conversely, **Student Life** presents a significant area for improvement, with a low rating of 1.5. The university also received solid ratings in **Professors** and **Value** (both 3.5), with **Facilities** and **Accomodation** averaging 3. **Internationality** sits in the middle at 2.5.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.
With a 4.29 average rating from 136 reviews, ~88% are positive, highlighting inclusivity, practical learning, and great professors. A small ~3% of feedback mentions issues with teacher clarity, exam quality, and unaccommodating professors.
Nearly all reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable and engaging professors, a wide course variety, and supportive university personnel. A strong interaction between instructors and students is frequently mentioned.
With a 5/5 average rating, this university is highly regarded by students, who praise its industry opportunities and career preparation. ~100% of feedback is positive, highlighting supportive teachers.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. It highlights an amazing campus with good facilities, new library, and great buildings. Teachers were also praised, though a discrepancy in program difficulty was noted.
With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, positive feedback comprises approximately 50% of the sentiment. Students highlight French language requirements and inflation as challenges, while one positive review commends the university for not requiring French for graduate students.
Nothing to show
With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.
Concordia University's linguistics program is a well-rounded introduction to the field of study for any aspiring linguist. The required courses allow students to browse all areas of the field, ranging from syntax to historical linguistics. Once you find your niche within the program, you can pick and choose what to learn from the more advanced courses. My favorite course during my time in the program was a special topics class on Old Egyptian. Mark Hale, the incredible professor who taught the course, inspired my passion for classical languages. My only critique of the program is the lack of advertised resources pertaining to post-graduate endeavors in the field. More information shared on graduate studies might have been helpful early on in the program. In conclusion, Concordia University is a great institution as long as you're passionate about your studies and well-engaged in your program.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
