Concordia University vs O'Sullivan College of Montreal vs John Abbott College vs École de technologie supérieure - ETS vs College CDI

Side-by-side comparison from 160 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: John Abbott College (5.00)
Concordia University: wins 1/7 categories
O'Sullivan College of Montreal: wins 0/7 categories
John Abbott College: wins 3/7 categories
École de technologie supérieure - ETS: wins 0/7 categories
College CDI: wins 0/7 categories
LaSalle College Montreal: wins 0/7 categories
RUBIKA: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Montreal, Canada
4.30
Read more reviews
141 reviews
×
Best programme: Business and Marketing
Montreal, Canada
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Engineering Technologies
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Montreal, Canada
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Valenciennes, France
4.40
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: 2D Animation
Category ratings
Facilities
4.14
3.00
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.47
Location
4.50
4.00
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
3.13
Professors
4.09
3.00
4.00
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.27
Win
Internationality
4.53
Win
3.00
4.00
2.50
Not rated
Not rated
3.87
Student life
4.26
3.00
5.00
Win
1.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.20
Value
4.21
3.00
3.00
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
Win
Accommodation
3.92
4.00
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Welcoming and supportive faculty
  • +Practical and relevant programs
  • +Positive and engaging campus environment

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent facilities and a positive, historic campus atmosphere.
  • +High-quality teaching and engaging, challenging academic programs.
  • +Vibrant campus life with numerous extracurricular activities.
  • +Lack of English support for international students
  • +Limited scholarship opportunities for non-French speakers
  • +Difficulty finding part-time employment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
  • +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
  • +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and difficult-to-understand instructors are a recurring issue.
  • -Students dislike the outdated and uncomfortable facilities.
  • -Exam design and content quality, including errors and excessive difficulty, are a significant concern.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of support are frequently mentioned.
  • -Lack of practical application and career relevance in coursework is a recurring concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
  • -The quality and relevance of the curriculum are often criticized.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
  • -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
Rating summary
What students say

This university garners its highest marks in **Internationality (4.53)** and **Location (4.50)**, indicating these are significant strengths. Student life and value are also well-regarded, both scoring above 4.2. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, receiving a rating of 3.92, suggesting room for improvement. Professors and facilities are rated competently around the 4.1 mark.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for **Facilities** and **Location**, alongside a strong showing in **Student Life**. However, areas for improvement are apparent in **Accomodation** and **Value**, both receiving a rating of 3. Ratings for **Professors** and **Internationality** fall in the upper-mid range.

A notable strength of this institution is its prime **Location**, scoring a high 4.5. Conversely, **Student Life** presents a significant area for improvement, with a low rating of 1.5. The university also received solid ratings in **Professors** and **Value** (both 3.5), with **Facilities** and **Accomodation** averaging 3. **Internationality** sits in the middle at 2.5.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~90% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.28/5, students praise the friendly, inclusive, and entrepreneurial campus environment. A small percentage of negative reviews mention issues with teaching quality and exam design.

Nothing to show

The single review is overwhelmingly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. It highlights an amazing campus with good facilities, new library, and great buildings. Teachers were also praised, though a discrepancy in program difficulty was noted.

With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, positive feedback comprises approximately 50% of the sentiment. Students highlight French language requirements and inflation as challenges, while one positive review commends the university for not requiring French for graduate students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.

Rating distribution
5★
43%
0%
100%
50%
0%
0%
47%
4★
45%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
47%
3★
9%
100%
0%
50%
0%
0%
7%
2★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
BA, Major in Linguistics

Concordia University's linguistics program is a well-rounded introduction to the field of study for any aspiring linguist. The required courses allow students to browse all areas of the field, ranging from syntax to historical linguistics. Once you find your niche within the program, you can pick and choose what to learn from the more advanced courses. My favorite course during my time in the program was a special topics class on Old Egyptian. Mark Hale, the incredible professor who taught the course, inspired my passion for classical languages. My only critique of the program is the lack of advertised resources pertaining to post-graduate endeavors in the field. More information shared on graduate studies might have been helpful early on in the program. In conclusion, Concordia University is a great institution as long as you're passionate about your studies and well-engaged in your program.

Netwrok management and what i've learned about it

Network management refers to the various activities, tools, and technologies that are used to design, deploy, maintain, and optimize the performance of a network. It involves a wide range of tasks, including monitoring network performance, identifying and troubleshooting problems, configuring and updating network devices, and managing network security. Network management is important for ensuring that a network operates smoothly and efficiently, and for maintaining the availability and reliability of network services. Some common tools and technologies used in network management include network management protocols, network management software, and network management systems.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close