University of New York in Prague - UNYP vs University of Chemistry and Technology of Prague vs Charles University vs University of South Bohemia - USB vs Technical University of Ostrava - VSB
Side-by-side comparison from 255 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +International, American-style education with small, discussion-based classes
- +Practical, real-world learning from experienced, accessible professors
- +Supportive and engaging environment that encourages critical thinking
- +Supportive faculty and program flexibility
- +Practical, hands-on learning with excellent labs and equipment
- +Strong community and international student experience
- +Passionate and expert professors
- +Numerous academic and extracurricular opportunities
- +Diverse and international environment
- +Dedicated and experienced teaching staff
- +Supportive and flexible learning environment
- +Engaging extracurricular activities and cultural immersion
- +Excellent study environment and facilities
- +Engaging student life and activities
- +Strong academic programs and resources
- +Caring professors and strong community support
- +Enriching international environment and connections
- +Inspiring location and career development opportunities
- +Strong community and supportive teachers.
- +Modern campus and facilities.
- +Abundant extracurricular activities and personal development opportunities.
- -Overpriced tuition and fees.
- -Poor quality of teaching and curriculum.
- -Unresponsive administration and management.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are commonly criticized.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
- -Poor student treatment and high failure rates.
- -Discriminatory practices towards international students.
- -Lack of fair assessment opportunities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling unsupported.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning environment.
- -Lack of communication and support from the institution is a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
- -Lack of effective teaching and learning resources.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of essential resources hinders learning.
The university garners strong scores across most aspects, with **Location** standing out as exceptionally high at 4.90. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also received very positive feedback. **Accomodation** represents the weakest area, scoring 3.95, while **Facilities** and **Value** are rated well but not as high as other categories. Professors and overall value are also rated favorably.
The university's location received the highest marks, with a score of 4.7, followed closely by facilities and accommodation, both at 4.27. Areas for improvement include internationality, which scored 3.82, making it the weakest surveyed category. Student life and value for money were rated at a solid 4.
Overall, the university demonstrates robust performance in several key areas. Professors and location receive particularly high marks, alongside strong scores for student life and internationality. Value is also rated favorably. The weakest areas, though still respectable, are facilities and accommodation.
This institution receives strong endorsements for its academic and international offerings. Professors are highly rated at 4.5, while location and internationality both score 4.375. Student life and value also demonstrate solid performance. Facilities are well-regarded, though accommodation emerges as the weakest area with a rating of 3.75.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its facilities and internationality, both scoring a high 4.75. Student life, location, and accommodation also receive positive feedback with a 4.5 rating. Professors are rated a strong 4.5 as well. The weakest area, though still good, is value at 4.25.
The university garners positive feedback across several key aspects. Location stands out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.62. Student life and internationality also score highly, both exceeding 4.5. Conversely, accommodation receives the lowest score at 4.20, representing the weakest area. Facilities, professors, and value maintain solid ratings, all above 4.4.
Professors stand out with an impressive rating, reflecting a particular strength in academic instruction. The university also scores highly in location and value. Accommodation presents the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement compared to other aspects of the student experience. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid, well-rounded performance.
All 50 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.68/5. Students praise the international environment, smaller classes, and professors' practical industry experience. Discussions and critical thinking are highlighted strengths.
Nine out of ten reviews are positive, highlighting enriching experiences, skilled faculty, and practical, research-oriented programs. Some mention demanding courses and occasional English communication barriers from instructors.
Over 97% of reviews are positive, praising excellent professors and numerous academic/extracurricular opportunities. A small fraction of feedback (~3%) mentions poor student treatment and unfair academic progression.
With an average rating of 4.36/5 from 11 reviews, ~91% of feedback is positive. Students highlight good teacher relationships, flexible courses, and beautiful locations. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students praise the study environment, teachers, facilities, and student life, highlighting well-stocked libraries, modern labs, and good recreational spaces.
All 66 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight a strong sense of community, supportive and knowledgeable professors, and valuable international experiences. The university's location and resources are also frequently praised.
With a 4.8/5 average rating from 45 reviews, students praise the strong sense of community, wonderful professors, and modern, welcoming campus. There are no reported negative experiences.
I studied at UNYP and overall had a very positive experience. What I appreciated most was the international environment, smaller classes, and the chance to interact directly with professors instead of feeling like just another student in a huge lecture hall. The university has a practical, English-speaking atmosphere, and it is a good fit for students who want an American-style education in the center of Prague. I also liked that many classes encouraged discussion, presentations, and real examples rather than only theory. Of course, like at any university, some administrative processes can take time and the experience may depend on the program and professors you choose. But from a student perspective, UNYP gave me useful academic experience, international connections, and a lot of personal growth. I would recommend it to students who want a smaller, international university environment in Prague and are ready to be active in their studies.
Nothing to show
My name is Bashar Ali, I am a medicine student in the first year. Today I am going to share my experience in Charles university. As a new student I was confused at the beginning of the year but after not long time I got used to the university system and the university stuff was very helpful starting from professional and nice teachers and ending with office employees. For me the academic side was perfect and my experience was very good. The university provide us with valuable information and we can find a lot of different students from different parts of the world so we can meet people from different cultures. I lived in the dorms and for me it was good because it was safe, clean and cheap. Now I am very happy in my studies especially that the university degree is recognized all over the world in addition that it is one of the highest ranking in the world in conclusion, Charles University offers a world-class medical education that combines rigorous academics, exceptional clinical training, and abundant research opportunities
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I can say I am completely different from before and after AAU. At some point I wondered but now without even noticing I can see my knowledge has improved a lot. I say seamless because it is not the traditional type of learning, you learn through hands on projects, in class discussions, real world scenarios, interactive sessions and becomes part of your day to day life and interests. I 100% Recommend AAU to anyone who wants to experience a life-long a real international community and learn in the process while having the time of your life in Europe!
Great sense of community, once you find the right people. The professors are wonderful, especially Dr. Hurtová and Dr. Tomášková. The entire university recently had a massive facelift, so the whole institution feels modern and welcoming.
