GBSB Global Business School vs Universidad Europea - UE vs Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP vs Universidad Francisco de Vitoria vs Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia - UCAM
Side-by-side comparison from 188 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert faculty and engaging curriculum
- +Practical, real-world application and career focus
- +Vibrant international community and personal growth
- +Modern teaching and attractive campus
- +Strong business opportunities and practical learning
- +Supportive faculty and international exchange programs
- +Practical, real-world skills training
- +Professional, industry-experienced faculty
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +High academic rigor and quality of courses.
- +Supportive and welcoming staff.
- +Practical focus and excellent facilities.
- +Supportive and attentive faculty
- +High-quality, well-organized programs
- +Diverse and international community
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +Practical, real-world projects and PBLs
- +Strong career development and professional growth opportunities
- +Supportive, family-like community and personalized attention
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -The academic quality is perceived as low, with ineffective teaching and irrelevant degrees.
- -Lack of career support, such as failing to help with internships, is a major concern.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative staff.
- -Teachers are indifferent and unsupportive of student learning.
- -High costs for course materials.
- -Low professor English proficiency and lack of student/teacher engagement.
- -Poor organization and administrative issues.
- -Poor organization and unqualified staff
- -Disrespectful and uncaring faculty
- -Outdated facilities and irrelevant curriculum
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are recurring problems.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum concerns are frequently mentioned.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frequent disruptions.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
A look at university ratings reveals strong points in **Internationality** (4.66) and **Location** (4.49), indicating a welcoming and accessible environment. Professors also received high marks (4.11) and student life is generally positive (3.83). The weakest area is **Accommodation**, with a significantly lower rating (2.79), suggesting this is an aspect that could be improved. The overall value is rated moderately (3.61), with facilities also receiving a similar score (3.34).
Overall, the university receives strong marks, particularly in **Internationality (4.6)** and **Facilities (4.33)**. Student Life and Professors also score well, both above 4.2. The weakest areas identified are **Accomodation (3.87)** and **Value (3.78)**, though these still represent a moderately positive rating.
This institution garners a solid academic reputation, with professors receiving a strong rating of 3.82. While facilities and student life also score well around 3.6, accommodation emerges as the weakest area, rated at 3.16. Internationality and value also present as moderate aspects of the university experience.
Student feedback indicates a generally positive university experience, with **Student Life** standing out as a particular strength. Areas like **Facilities** and **Professors** also received solid ratings. Conversely, **Location** and **Internationality** are rated somewhat lower, suggesting these aspects could be areas for improvement. **Accomodation** and **Value** fall within the mid-range of scores.
Reviewing the university's performance reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The strongest area for the institution is clearly its professors, who received an excellent rating. Students also appear to be well-served by the location and student life. Areas with slightly lower, though still respectable, scores include facilities, accommodation, internationality, and value for money.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
Remarkably high scores across multiple aspects characterize this university's ratings. Professors and student life stand out as exceptional strengths, both receiving near-perfect scores. Facilities and location also garnered very positive feedback. Accommodation, while still good, presents the weakest area in this assessment. Internationality and value also received strong ratings, indicating a well-rounded offering.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting community, atmosphere, and practical curriculum. Negative feedback, about 13%, mentions issues with program usefulness, administrative support, and organization.
Nearly 74% of 54 reviews are positive, highlighting modern teaching methods, spacious campuses, and good career opportunities. A small amount of negative feedback (~3.7%) notes administrative issues and unengaged instructors.
Approximately 74% of 28 reviews are positive, highlighting professional, sector-active teachers and practical, real-world facilities. A small portion of feedback (~7%) expresses disappointment with low English proficiency among some professors and organizational issues.
Most students are very satisfied, praising demanding coursework, quality professors, and excellent facilities. Around 11% of feedback is negative, citing poor organization and disrespect from some staff.
With a 4.18 average rating from 11 reviews, students praise UCAM's high-level teaching, supportive faculty, and enriching academic and international environments. No negative feedback was provided.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
With an average rating of 4.73/5 from 26 reviews, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight practical, project-based learning with real companies and strong personal/professional growth opportunities. There were no negative reviews.
The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.
Excellent university, with experienced professors, professionals in the areas they teach and with an incomparable teacher-student proximity.It is a very good university for International students since thet offer Portuguese classes and some subjects are in English. In terms of infrastructure, despite being small and not having all the conditions and equipment, it brings together a pleasant environment for studying - in addition to very good cleaning conditions and modern rooms. At the administrative level, it is organized. As for the students, many are very interested in being there, excellent students and enormous dedication.
Nothing to show
The Faculty of Communication is clearly oriented to the journalist being the communication the second course. From here you find everything: material in poor condition, teachers who are teachers for the mere fact of being ex-students without being properly qualified, curriculum badly organized with repeated subjects and others of filling where they do not meet the teacher's guide , Impressive lack of practices or practices that have nothing to do with the sector, misleading advertising on the web (wide range of options that teachers are responsible for reducing to a minimum without consulting the interest of students claiming "I do because I think it is The best for you "), the work grants are distributed according to how well you take with x person, etc. Leaders in personal attention? I do not think so. I am aware that the situation is better than in a public but for what it costs, it is not worth at all. If you do not know what to do with your life, it can help you because you give 1000 different things and you can find your vocation, if you know what you want, choose to take your money in a smarter way.
The life in Murcia is simply great! A lot of tapas bars, bars, clubs etc. which are affordable for students! During the courses at UCAM, I got to know so many international people who got really good friends in the meanwhile. The only shortcoming is that several professors have difficulties to explain their ideas in English, because of the language barrier. But this does not concern every teacher. Furthermore, the teaching staff is not only about professors but about people having their own business and talking about their own experiences. All in all the education is pretty good at UCAM. But the working-life balance is even better. "Savoir-Vivre!"
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
I enjoyed this programe, academically is it similar to other programs in other cities but it offers so much more. The personal connection with professors, strong guidance for future career and the international network is what separates it from other options!
