GBSB Global Business School vs IE University vs Universidad Complutense de Madrid - UCM vs Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP vs Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia - UCAM
Side-by-side comparison from 470 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Flexible learning options and strong academic programs.
- +Supportive community and international atmosphere.
- +Practical, real-world application and career development support.
- +Outstanding professors and practical, career-focused learning
- +Highly international and entrepreneurial student environment
- +Vibrant campus life and valuable networking opportunities
- +Exceptional professors and engaging learning experiences
- +Challenging programs leading to professional development
- +Broad and relevant study programs
- +Excellent professors and comprehensive programs
- +Welcoming people and active campus life
- +Valuable cultural and practical learning experiences
- +Supportive and attentive faculty
- +High-quality, well-organized programs
- +Diverse and international community
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +Practical, real-world projects and industry focus
- +Strong professional network and career preparation
- +Supportive and personalized learning environment
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Low educational and academic quality
- -Poor career and internship support
- -Academic quality and outdated course content.
- -Disappointing program management and misleading marketing.
- -Lack of traditional college experience due to corporate campus.
- -Outdated facilities and technology.
- -Poorly organized curriculum and low academic level.
- -Lack of practical application and professional relevance.
- -Low English proficiency of professors
- -Poor organization and lack of care for Erasmus students
- -Uncomfortable environment and lack of student engagement
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are recurring problems.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum concerns are frequently mentioned.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant concern.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Professors** also garnered positive feedback. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** fall within a moderate range, indicating areas with room for improvement alongside established positives.
This institution receives particularly high marks for its **Internationality**, scoring an impressive 4.77. **Location** also stands out with a strong rating of 4.55. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, with a rating of 3.78. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Student Life are generally well-regarded, as is the perceived Value.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths, particularly in its **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving top marks. **Value** also stands out as a high-performing area. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Facilities** represent the weakest aspects according to these ratings. While professors and internationality fare well, these two categories require the most attention for improvement.
Overall, the university receives a moderately positive reception from students. Professors and facilities stand out as particularly strong points, with ratings just under 4.0. Conversely, accommodation and internationality are identified as areas for improvement, scoring the lowest. Student life and value also fall within the mid-range, suggesting a mixed but generally favorable student experience.
Reviewing the university's performance reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The strongest area for the institution is clearly its professors, who received an excellent rating. Students also appear to be well-served by the location and student life. Areas with slightly lower, though still respectable, scores include facilities, accommodation, internationality, and value for money.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
This institution receives a well-rounded set of ratings. **Professors** are the highest-rated area, closely followed by **Student Life** and **Location**. **Accommodations** emerge as the weakest point among the evaluated aspects. The university also scores well in **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, indicating a generally positive student experience.
~74% of 48 reviews are positive, highlighting flexibility, excellent professors, and community. A smaller ~12.5% of reviews express dissatisfaction with the program's value, administrative support, and academic standards.
Approximately 97% of reviews are positive, praising the modern campus, international environment, practical coursework, and networking opportunities. A small amount of negative feedback mentions academic deception and issues with specific programs.
~74% of 164 reviews are positive, highlighting good learning, challenging degrees, and knowledgeable professors. A small ~4% of negative feedback mentions outdated facilities and some concerns about teaching and evaluation methods.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising excellent professors, a great campus, and enjoyable social experiences. A small percentage (~5.3%) express disappointment with academic rigor and low English proficiency from some instructors.
With a 4.18 average rating from 11 reviews, students praise UCAM's high-level teaching, supportive faculty, and enriching academic and international environments. No negative feedback was provided.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% giving high ratings. Students highlight an enriching, practical learning experience, international environment, and strong professional preparation. There is no negative feedback.
The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.
ie university is the best university in the world, they education system is the best and infrastructure. It's the best university to put your child to I'm very happy with it i dont wanna lie l. Please go for it
The Universidad Complutense de Madrid is an old and big University. This comes with good and bad things. The best is that it has very very very good teachers and a good quality of studies with a huge variety of choices. But, at the same time the teachers, even though they are very good, they've been teaching for a very long time. Sometimes more than they should and they should have retired a long time ago. Also the bureaucracy is slow and exasperating. The university doesn't even respect their own deadlines and they tend to be a little botchy. In summary, a good university that needs to be renovated.
Nothing to show
The life in Murcia is simply great! A lot of tapas bars, bars, clubs etc. which are affordable for students! During the courses at UCAM, I got to know so many international people who got really good friends in the meanwhile. The only shortcoming is that several professors have difficulties to explain their ideas in English, because of the language barrier. But this does not concern every teacher. Furthermore, the teaching staff is not only about professors but about people having their own business and talking about their own experiences. All in all the education is pretty good at UCAM. But the working-life balance is even better. "Savoir-Vivre!"
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
I enjoyed this programe, academically is it similar to other programs in other cities but it offers so much more. The personal connection with professors, strong guidance for future career and the international network is what separates it from other options!
