GBSB Global Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs Universidad Europea - UE vs UIC Barcelona vs Universitat de les Illes Balears
Side-by-side comparison from 127 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, engaging professors and a supportive learning environment.
- +Opportunities for cultural immersion and personal growth abroad.
- +Strong business mindset development and practical entrepreneurial programs.
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Modern facilities and resources
- +Academic excellence and innovative methodology
- +Modern teaching and attractive campus
- +Strong business opportunities and practical learning
- +Supportive faculty and international exchange programs
- +Excellent academic quality and well-prepared graduates
- +Supportive and international student community
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Welcoming campus atmosphere and supportive professors
- +Positive student interactions and friendly people
- +Well-structured and informative academic programs
- +Friendly, professional, and experienced teachers
- +Valuable extracurricular activities and networking opportunities
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Low academic quality and outdated facilities
- -Poor career and internship support
- -Poor management and unqualified staff.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of administrative support and disorganization.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative staff.
- -Teachers are indifferent and unsupportive of student learning.
- -High costs for course materials.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Unhelpful and indifferent staff.
- -Deceptive financial practices.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Lack of engaging teaching and course structure is disliked.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -A lack of engaging or relevant course content is frequently criticized.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
This institution scores exceptionally well in **Internationality** (4.63) and **Location** (4.43), indicating a globally connected campus in a desirable setting. **Professors** also receive a strong rating (4.13). Conversely, **Accomodation** is the weakest area, with a rating of 2.76. **Facilities** and **Student Life** fall in the mid-range, with **Value** also receiving a solid, though not outstanding, score.
This university garners strong approval, particularly for its **accommodation**, which achieved the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well. Conversely, **internationality** received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects. Professors, location, and value for money are all rated at a solid 4 out of 5.
Overall, the university receives strong marks, particularly in **Internationality (4.6)** and **Facilities (4.33)**. Student Life and Professors also score well, both above 4.2. The weakest areas identified are **Accomodation (3.87)** and **Value (3.78)**, though these still represent a moderately positive rating.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.25, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.17. **Student Life** is rated a respectable 3.75, while **Internationality** scores 3.83. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating of 3.33, and **Location** at 3.91. The university also scores well in **Value** at 3.92.
With standout scores in **Facilities** (4.5) and **Student Life** (3.75), the university presents appealing aspects. However, **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker area with a rating of 2.75. Other categories, including Professors, Location, Internationality, and Value, fall within a solid middle ground.
This institution garners strong marks, particularly excelling in its desirable **Location** and vibrant **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** are also well-regarded, all scoring a solid 4. The primary area for potential improvement lies in **Internationality**, which received a comparatively lower rating of 3.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting quality education, cultural expansion, and strong business mindsets. A smaller portion (~15%) expresses dissatisfaction with program usefulness, administration support, and perceived academic levels.
Most reviews praise the academic environment, dedicated professors, and supportive staff. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with a specific director and teacher hiring practices.
Nearly 74% of 54 reviews are positive, highlighting modern teaching methods, spacious campuses, and good career opportunities. A small amount of negative feedback (~3.7%) notes administrative issues and unengaged instructors.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive classmates, and good job preparation. ~7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with unhelpful administration.
With an average rating of 3.6/5 and 3 out of 5 reviews being positive, feedback highlights a friendly campus atmosphere and approachable professors. A minor concern mentioned is difficulty securing student housing.
With one review, the average rating is 4 out of 5. Positive feedback highlights friendly, professional teachers and engaging extracurricular activities. No negative feedback was reported.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.
Nothing to show
Excellent university, with experienced professors, professionals in the areas they teach and with an incomparable teacher-student proximity.It is a very good university for International students since thet offer Portuguese classes and some subjects are in English. In terms of infrastructure, despite being small and not having all the conditions and equipment, it brings together a pleasant environment for studying - in addition to very good cleaning conditions and modern rooms. At the administrative level, it is organized. As for the students, many are very interested in being there, excellent students and enormous dedication.
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
I'm a physoterapiy student at the University of the Balearic Islands. I recently finished the second year, so I can give my opinion about my teachers and the structure of my campus. In this two years I had some perfect teachers. Their are teachers of Biomechanic, Anatomy and fisiology of the muscle and bone system, palpatory anatomy and image diagnostic, Valoration in physoterapy and Kinesiotherapy. In terms of my campus, there are 5 classes that have stretchers, but not all of them are regulable. Also the students have the possibility to go to the Campus sport, paying a monthly fee or another possibilities (it's very cheap and have a lot of installations).
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
