Paris-Dauphine University vs AgroParisTech vs SKEMA Business School vs EDHEC Business School vs Schiller International University
Side-by-side comparison from 222 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic reputation and focused learning environment
- +Supportive faculty and engaging teaching quality
- +Excellent career opportunities and international exposure
- +Strong scientific education and global issue understanding
- +Development of soft skills and job market preparation
- +Teacher availability and flexible module choices
- +Strong academic programmes with practical application
- +Excellent opportunities for skill development and networking
- +Valuable international exposure and alumni support
- +Rigorous academic and practical preparation for careers
- +Strong alumni network and career services support
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
- +Engaging learning environment with interactive methods
- +Diverse and international student community
- +Unique multi-city European study experience
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a common complaint.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and ineffective curriculum are also disliked.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a major drawback.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are consistently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause poor communication and disorganization.
- -Teaching faculty and their perceived focus on profit over education are criticized.
- -Guidance for career goals and clarity on doubts are lacking.
- -High tuition fees and perceived low return on investment.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a concern.
- -Lack of transparency and communication is prevalent.
Nothing to show
Reviewing the provided ratings reveals a generally positive assessment of the institution. Student life stands out as the strongest area, achieving the highest score. Conversely, facilities received the lowest rating, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other aspects, including professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and value, all scored commendably, contributing to a well-rounded university experience.
Exceptional student life and outstanding facilities are key strengths, both scoring a high 4.5. Professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and value all received solid ratings of 4, indicating a consistently good experience across the board. No areas scored below a 4, suggesting a well-rounded and competitive institution.
This university demonstrates particularly strong performance in its **Professors** (4.41), **Internationality** (4.36), and **Location** (4.25). **Facilities** (4.21) and **Student Life** (4.11) also receive favorable scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating of 3.58, while **Value** sits at 4.04.
Academic and student experience aspects generally receive positive marks, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.41. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area at 3.14, indicating room for improvement in this regard. Location and Student Life are moderately rated, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in those domains.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
This university garners excellent reviews, particularly excelling in its **professors and location**, both achieving perfect scores. Student life and internationality also stand out with scores above 4.7. Areas with slightly lower, though still strong, ratings include **facilities and accommodation**. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded positive student experience with high marks across most aspects.
Nothing to show
All 10 reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students highlight rewarding academic journeys, intellectually engaging environments, and supportive faculty. Career opportunities and strong program reputation are frequently praised.
All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight strong scientific education in agriculture and life sciences, useful business skills, and good preparation for the job market. Some mention a desire for improved English language support.
Over 91% of reviews are positive, highlighting student associations, international opportunities, and practical skills for careers. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with management, communication, and course organization.
With a 4.24/5 average, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense courses, strong alumni networks, and excellent career services. A small percentage of feedback mentioned high tuition fees.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
Students highly praise the interactive learning, international community, and opportunities for academic and personal growth. There are no negative reviews.
Nothing to show
Paris Dauphine is indeed recognized worldwide for its teaching in organizational and market sciences. This is why one can specialize in many interesting fields such as Finance or Marketing. It is also the case for the numerous research works it has been able to carry out. So, I love my University and I would recommend it very strongly.
The French Grandes Ecoles, such as Mines ParisTech, are separate and parallel systems of higher education in France. I wish I had gone to the Grand Ecole. The French tend to be a little nervous about calling their Grande École 'university', but 'university' is at the heart of the English language. Mines Especially Paristech, historically a mining school, now teaches very little mining (though some geology). The name stuck, but the curriculum changed significantly with the decline of the French mining industry. To say that Les Mines (called Mines ParisTech in French) is "the best engineering school" is very misleading. The French have a very different understanding of the word "engineering", covering everything from mathematics and analysis to management and general problem solving.As an "engineering" student at the Ecole des Mines, Not only do they take subjects like social sciences and economics, but they also take very advanced courses on what much of the Western world considers "real" engineering. design and planning. Internships in foreign companies and national research institutes are often the focus of training at les Mines, unlike universities. At Les Mines, you graduate with solid experience and a very broad overview of your 'expertise'. They also have a good knowledge of math and physics (otherwise they won't get in, but that's a whole other story).
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.
Nothing to show
