Aylesbury College vs Technical University of Mombasa - TUM vs Ibn Tofail University - UIT vs Panjab University vs Polytechnic Institute of Tomar - IPT

Side-by-side comparison from 49 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Kenya Coast National Polytechnic (5.00)
Aylesbury College: wins 0/5 categories
Technical University of Mombasa - TUM: wins 0/5 categories
Ibn Tofail University - UIT: wins 0/5 categories
Panjab University: wins 1/5 categories
Polytechnic Institute of Tomar - IPT: wins 0/5 categories
Harbin Engineering University: wins 3/5 categories
Kenya Coast National Polytechnic: wins 1/5 categories
Comparing
Aylesbury, The United Kingdom
1.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Mathematics and Computer Science
Best programme: Accounting and Economics
chandigarh, India
4.40
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Art Management
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
3.67
4.29
3.89
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Location
3.00
4.23
4.00
4.88
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Professors
1.00
4.14
4.36
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Internationality
1.00
3.05
3.43
4.10
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Student life
1.00
3.82
3.79
4.38
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Value
2.00
4.14
4.14
4.30
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Accommodation
Not rated
3.59
3.54
3.88
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +engaging teaching and course structure
  • +helpful faculty and strong career support
  • +vibrant campus community and student life
  • +Supportive, friendly lecturers and useful, real-world curriculum
  • +Conducive learning environment with good facilities and moderate fees
  • +Prime coastal location and positive campus atmosphere
  • +Academic growth and skill development
  • +Supportive and inclusive learning environment
  • +Committed and helpful faculty
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Peaceful and motivating campus environment
  • +Strong academic and research resources

Nothing to show

  • +Welcoming international student support
  • +Excellent academic platforms, enabling continuity
  • +Practical, industry-based training
  • +Modern facilities and resources
  • +Competent, job-ready graduates
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, including lack of support and empathy.
  • -Lack of practical experience and institutional partnerships.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Poor communication and a disconnect from student needs are prevalent complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues lead to delayed and unclear communication regarding exams and results.
  • -Outdated facilities and a decline in university ranking are disappointing.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Ineffective communication and administrative issues.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support.
  • -Disorganized and inefficient administrative and management processes.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching methods and course content.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution's strengths lie in its location, which received a strong rating, and its perceived value. Areas needing significant improvement, however, are facilities and accommodation, both scoring zero. The university also shows moderate performance in professors, student life, and internationality, indicating these aspects are areas for potential development.

Overall, the university garners positive feedback with its strongest areas being Location and Professors, both receiving high marks. Value is also rated highly. Conversely, Internationality stands out as the weakest aspect, with a significantly lower rating compared to other categories. Facilities and Accomodation are rated moderately, while Student Life also falls into the mid-range of assessments.

Evaluations indicate a strong academic environment with high scores for Professors (4.36) and Facilities (4.29). Value for money also scores well at 4.14. Areas for improvement include Accomodation (3.54) and Internationality (3.43), which received the lowest ratings. Student Life (3.79) and Location (4.00) fall in the mid-range.

Remarkably high scores characterize this institution, particularly in its **Location**, boasting an impressive 4.875. **Professors** also receive commendation at 4.5. Conversely, **Facilities** represent the area with the lowest rating at 3.888. The university demonstrates a strong performance in Student Life (4.375) and Value (4.3), with good marks also awarded for Internationality (4.1) and Accommodation (3.875).

Nothing to show

This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accommodations**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. These aspects likely contribute significantly to a positive student experience. Conversely, the **Location** received a lower rating of 3, indicating it may not be as advantageous as other aspects. Professors are rated well at 4, suggesting a generally strong academic staff.

This institution garners excellent marks, particularly excelling in **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a perfect score. Facilities, Professors, Accommodation, and Value are also strong areas, each rated a solid 4. The standout areas demonstrate a vibrant and well-connected campus experience, while the other categories reflect a high-quality and rewarding educational investment.

Reviews summary
Highlights

One review expresses extreme dissatisfaction, giving a 1-star rating. The negative feedback, representing 100% of reviews, highlights issues with lack of support and perceived discrimination.

With an average rating of 4.09/5 from 22 reviews, ~82% are positive, highlighting friendly lecturers, useful courses, and good facilities. A small fraction (~4.6%) of feedback noted insufficient practical exposure and institutional partnerships for technical courses.

With an average rating of 4.07/5, ~79% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic growth, supportive environments, and committed lecturers. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a 4.4/5 average rating from 10 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive faculty, and a peaceful campus. ~10% of feedback noted issues with examination management and slow results.

Nothing to show

With one review, this university receives an average of 4/5 stars. The feedback highlights excellent treatment of international students and amazing academic platforms, even during COVID-19. No negative feedback was received.

With a 5/5 average rating, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The single review highlights the institution's reputation, diverse course offerings with a practical focus, and modern facilities. No negative feedback was provided.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
32%
29%
60%
0%
0%
100%
4★
0%
50%
50%
30%
0%
100%
0%
3★
0%
14%
21%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
5%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
1★
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

STUDENT SUPPORT

It's a friendly environment to be in since it's located near the coastal beach, the top management usually offer spiritual growth and motivation to all students regardless of ones' faith or color. Also the tuition fees are moderate.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close