Panthéon-Assas University vs Rennes School of Business vs emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs Audencia Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 351 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Panthéon-Assas University: wins 0/7 categories
Rennes School of Business: wins 0/7 categories
emlyon business school: wins 2/7 categories
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Audencia Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Excelia Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Ecole des Ponts Business School: wins 5/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Management
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Master in Management
La Rochelle, France
4.10
Read more reviews
62 reviews
×
Best programme: Master of Science (MSc)
Best programme: AI in Project Management
Category ratings
Facilities
3.14
4.03
4.15
4.22
3.98
3.97
4.50
Win
Location
4.00
4.22
4.60
4.24
4.06
4.28
4.60
Win
Professors
3.75
4.21
4.06
4.39
4.13
3.93
4.83
Win
Internationality
3.13
4.34
4.60
4.40
4.39
4.29
4.67
Win
Student life
3.38
4.37
4.25
4.15
3.99
4.25
4.50
Win
Value
3.88
4.11
4.43
Win
4.07
4.13
3.93
4.17
Accommodation
3.14
3.76
3.94
Win
3.60
3.58
3.59
3.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic reputation and career opportunities
  • +Supportive teachers and engaging learning environment
  • +Vibrant student community and active campus life
  • +Practical, business-focused education with experienced professors
  • +Diverse and inclusive international community and learning environment
  • +Excellent academic quality and supportive facilities
  • +Practical and international programs with diverse students
  • +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
  • +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
  • +Practical, industry-focused learning and career opportunities
  • +Diverse international environment and personal growth
  • +Excellent teaching quality and supportive student life
  • +Excellent teachers and diverse international community
  • +Great facilities and well-structured classes
  • +Supportive learning environment and city amenities
  • +Diverse and multicultural environment, international opportunities
  • +High-quality teaching, engaging professors, and practical curriculum
  • +Strong alumni network and enriching student experience
  • +Transformative personal and professional growth
  • +Practical, market-relevant skills for career advancement
  • +High-quality, competent faculty and engaging courses
Cons
  • -Lack of teaching and irrelevant course content.
  • -Exploitative business practices to profit from students.
  • -Low overall quality of education.
  • -Administrative and management issues are prevalent and unhelpful.
  • -Poor English communication and resources are a significant barrier for international students.
  • -Professors' English proficiency is a recurring concern.
  • -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
  • -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
  • -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and exam management.
  • -Perceived focus on profit over student well-being and discriminatory practices.
  • -Disorganized programs and overwhelming course loads with inconsistent evaluation methods.
  • -Limited practical training and theory-heavy courses.
  • -Unresponsive professors and resistance to feedback.
  • -Lack of student interaction and networking opportunities.
  • -Superficial course content and lack of practical value.
  • -Perceived unprofessionalism and inadequate career support despite high tuition.
  • -Mismatched course offerings with student expectations.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of resources and support for students is a major concern.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location** (4.0) and **Value** (3.875), suggesting positive aspects in its geographical placement and the perceived worth of its offerings. Conversely, areas requiring attention include **Internationality** (3.125), **Facilities**, and **Accomodation** (both 3.14), indicating these aspects may be less developed compared to other evaluated components. Professors and Student Life also received solid, though not outstanding, scores.

Student life and internationality stand out as the university's strongest aspects, both scoring above 4.3. Professors and location also received very favorable reviews. Accommodation emerged as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.76, though overall value and facilities were rated well above average.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.

With a well-rounded set of evaluations, this university demonstrates particular strengths in **Internationality** and **Professors**, both receiving exceptionally high scores. **Accomodation** stands out as the area with the lowest rating, suggesting room for improvement. Other categories like Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Value are all rated positively, indicating a generally favorable student experience.

This university garners strong marks for its **Internationality**, receiving a high rating of 4.385. Professors and Value also score well at 4.125. Areas like Facilities and Student Life are generally positive, hovering around 4.0. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.579, indicating it could benefit from improvement compared to other aspects of the university experience.

This university demonstrates particularly strong performance in its Internationality (4.29), Location (4.28), and Student Life (4.25). Conversely, Accomodation appears to be its weakest area, receiving a rating of 3.59. Ratings for Facilities (3.97), Professors (3.93), and Value (3.93) fall within a moderate range.

Overall, this university receives commendations across most aspects, with particularly high marks for its professors (4.83) and internationality (4.67). Facilities and student life also score well. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.33. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.17.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Around 78% of reviews are positive, highlighting a strong academic reputation, quality legal education, and supportive teaching staff. A small portion of feedback, about 11%, expresses concerns about the relevance of some modules and the quality of teaching for distance learning.

Over 97% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong teaching methods, practical learning, and global faculty. A small amount of negative feedback concerns administrative support and language accessibility for international students.

The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.

The vast majority of reviews (~91%) praise the university for personal and professional growth opportunities, strong industry links, and excellent teaching quality. A small percentage of feedback (~2.4%) mentions poor management and communication.

Nearly all (95%) of 20 university reviews are positive, praising the learning environment, great facilities, and good teachers. A single negative review cited disappointment with practical tool training and professor engagement.

~95% of reviews are positive, highlighting multicultural environments, strong alumni networks, and quality teaching. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions superficial course coverage and lack of practical value.

All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight challenging and transformative experiences, career advancements, and high-quality courses and professors.

Rating distribution
5★
33%
38%
60%
50%
30%
32%
50%
4★
44%
54%
28%
42%
65%
53%
50%
3★
11%
5%
9%
7%
0%
11%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
1%
5%
3%
0%
1★
11%
3%
2%
1%
0%
2%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Exemplary institution

The school stands out as an exemplary institution with commendable features. The accommodation facilities are not only comfortable but also designed to foster a conducive learning environment. The faculty comprises diverse, highly qualified educators, ensuring a high standard of education. The emphasis on practical learning prepares students effectively for real-world scenarios. The institution offers a top-notch academic experience combined with excellent living standards, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking quality education.

Nothing to show

Class of 2018, Int'l Business Administration

Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.

Focus on multicultural business management

I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close