The Bucharest University of Economic Studies - ASE Bucuresti vs Ovidius University of Constanta - UOC vs Andrei Şaguna University of Constanţa vs Spiru Haret University vs Tiffin University Bucharest

Side-by-side comparison from 108 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: The Bucharest University of Economic Studies - ASE Bucuresti (4.20)
The Bucharest University of Economic Studies - ASE Bucuresti: wins 4/5 categories
Ovidius University of Constanta - UOC: wins 0/5 categories
Andrei Şaguna University of Constanţa: wins 1/5 categories
Spiru Haret University: wins 0/5 categories
Tiffin University Bucharest: wins 0/5 categories
Bucharest Business School - BBS: wins 0/5 categories
Constanta Maritime University: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Cybernetics
Best programme: American Studies
Bucharest, Romania
4.00
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.85
3.20
4.00
Win
3.80
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.66
Win
3.80
3.00
4.20
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.91
4.00
2.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.84
4.00
4.00
3.20
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.45
Win
3.20
4.00
3.40
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.04
Win
3.60
3.00
3.80
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.09
Win
3.20
2.00
3.60
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong, practical, and well-structured programs
  • +Good career opportunities and academic reputation
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
  • +Comprehensive and challenging curriculum
  • +Extensive resources and research opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Flexible distance learning and accessible study resources
  • +Good teachers and interactive courses
  • +Convenient location and modern facilities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and irrelevant curriculum.
  • -Lack of student focus and prioritization.
  • -Perceived as a money-making institution with poor value.
  • -Poor student treatment and perceived corruption.
  • -Limited extracurricular opportunities.

Nothing to show

  • -Ineffective communication and poor administrative support from the school.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources for learning.
  • -Unengaging teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum content.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

The university demonstrates a remarkably strong performance in its **Location**, achieving a score of 4.62. Student Life also received high marks at 4.39, with Accommodation and Value scoring favorably around 4.08 and 4.05 respectively. Conversely, **Facilities** emerged as the lowest-rated area, registering at 3.79. Professors and Internationality also fell within a similar mid-range, with scores of 3.89 and 3.80.

Overall, this institution demonstrates a strong performance in several key areas. Its professors and internationality are particularly well-regarded, both receiving a perfect score of 4. Conversely, facilities, student life, and accommodation present opportunities for improvement, each scoring 3.2. The university also scores solidly in location (3.8) and offers good value (3.6).

Nothing to show

This institution receives a commendable average rating, with its **Location** being its strongest asset at 4.2. **Professors** also scored highly at 4.0. Conversely, **Internationality** presented the weakest area with a rating of 3.2. Other aspects like Facilities, Value, and Accommodation fall within a similar mid-range, with Student Life also slightly lower.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

~98% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive professors, structured programs, and good career opportunities. A small ~2% of feedback mentioned outdated facilities and a perceived lack of student-focused administration.

University reviews are largely positive (~60%), with students praising knowledgeable faculty and comprehensive curricula. Some feedback (~20%) indicates a need for more practical experience and career guidance, with one review expressing strong dissatisfaction with faculty and system corruption.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~80%). Students highlight accessible distance learning and flexible scheduling. Some note decent academic quality and good teachers, though it's not considered the absolute best.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
44%
60%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
4★
36%
0%
0%
60%
0%
0%
0%
3★
18%
20%
100%
20%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Useful Programme with Room to Improve

Overall, I had a very positive experience with the International Economics programme. The courses provided a solid understanding of global markets, trade, monetary policy, development, and the economic forces shaping international business The programme could still improve in terms of administration, communication, and consistency across courses. Some classes felt more practical and engaging than others.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Affordable location

Available teachers for all course issues. Location near your home town. Courses take place according to the curriculum. The classes are interactive and complex. With some of my colleagues, we still keep in touch and we are very close.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close