Universidad de Palermo - UP vs Universidad Argentina de la Empresa - UADE vs Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires - ITBA vs Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN vs Universidad de Buenos Aires - UBA
Side-by-side comparison from 77 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Flexible study options and personalized learning paths
- +High-quality professors with real-world experience
- +Practical, project-based learning and career support
- +Excellent support and resources
- +Modern and well-equipped facilities
- +Practical experience and industry connections
- +Excellent and dedicated teachers preparing for real-world challenges
- +Supportive learning environment and community
- +Strong focus on technology and engineering
- +Strong engineering programs and good job prospects
- +Committed and experienced teaching staff
- +High-quality education providing a solid foundation
- +High academic standards and quality programs
- +Passionate and caring professors
- +Public and tuition-free access
- +Emphasis on teacher training and translation degrees
- +Esteemed faculty and industry experts
- +Comprehensive curriculum blending theory and practice
- +Specialized and innovative programs, especially in art, technology, health, and environment.
- +Excellent infrastructure and highly qualified faculty.
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of engagement from instructors and insufficient course relevance are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world applications.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common grievances.
- -The curriculum and teaching quality are sometimes criticized.
- -Poor management and administrative support
- -Outdated curriculum and excessive program length
- -Unattractive facilities
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of student support and engagement is a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant problem.
- -Lack of practical experience and unclear course structure is disappointing.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant issue.
- -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies cause frustration.
- -A perceived lack of support and engagement from instructors is common.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, scoring a high 4.6, and facilities, rated at 4.4. Conversely, location, accommodation, internationality, and value all received a moderate 3.8, indicating areas for potential improvement. The academic side is well-regarded, with professors achieving a solid 4.2. Overall, the university offers a good experience, particularly in its campus resources and social environment.
Impressively high marks distinguish this university across most aspects of student experience. Facilities, location, accommodation, and value are particularly strong, all receiving a near-perfect 4.75. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded at 4.625. Professors are rated highly at 4.5, representing the most moderate score within this excellent overall assessment.
Across all surveyed aspects, this institution garners perfect scores, indicating an outstanding educational experience. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated as excellent. There are no weak areas identified; the university demonstrates exceptional strength in every category evaluated.
This institution performs exceptionally well in location, boasting a rating of 4.09. Professors are also highly regarded at 3.91, and value for money receives a solid 3.73. Student life and facilities are rated moderately. However, internationality stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.82, followed closely by accommodation at 3.27.
Overall, the university receives strong ratings in most surveyed categories. Professors and value are notably high, alongside excellent student life and internationality. The location is also well-regarded. However, facilities and accommodation received the lowest scores, indicating areas for potential improvement.
This university demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores in professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and value. Facilities and student life also receive high marks, scoring a strong 4 out of 5. The only area not explicitly rated is its weakest, though the provided data indicates outstanding performance across all surveyed aspects.
This institution garners solid marks, particularly excelling in its **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life**, all receiving a score of 4. The university also scores well in **Value**, mirroring these strengths. Its **Location** and **Internationality** are rated moderately at 3. The **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker area, receiving a score of 2, indicating potential room for improvement.
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with ~77% of reviews rating it 4–5 stars and an average of 4.31/5. Students praise flexible study plans, project-based learning, and excellent professors. No negative feedback was reported.
With an average rating of 4.18/5, ~91% of reviews are positive. Students praise excellent education, supportive staff, modern campus facilities, and career opportunities. No negative feedback was received.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent teachers and strong preparation for the workforce. Facilities are acceptable and undergoing remodeling.
With an average rating of 3.69, ~62% of reviews are positive, praising good education and experienced professors. Around 15% are negative, citing outdated curricula and poor program management.
With an average rating of 4.22/5 from 36 reviews, ~92% are positive. Students praise high academic standards, excellent professors, and quality programs that foster critical thinking. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
The single review for Ens en Lenguas Vivas Sofia E. Broquen de Spangenberg is highly positive, giving it a 5/5 rating. This 100% positive sentiment highlights the university's excellence in language education, particularly its teacher training and translation programs.
The university receives positive feedback (~100%) for its strong infrastructure, qualified faculty, and innovative, specialized programs. One review highlighted unique offerings in art, technology, health, and environmental studies.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Undoubtedly Buenos Aires is a big city with many options in terms of higher education, but the Technological Institute is undoubtedly the best option (in my opinion) to study everything related to technology. I studied computer and data engineering, the experience was great. The teachers are qualified, the facilities are acceptable, and the classmates were very supportive.
Nothing to show
One of the best spanish-speak university in the word. Prestigious and free. The lack of material resources encourages one to be proactive and gives you that “street wisdom” that more classy universities dont have.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
