University of Stuttgart vs University of California, Santa Barbara - UCSB vs Walbrook Institute London vs Mohammed VI Polytechnic University - UM6P vs University of Kabianga - UoK

Side-by-side comparison from 44 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Mohammed VI Polytechnic University - UM6P (4.60)
University of Stuttgart: wins 0/7 categories
University of California, Santa Barbara - UCSB: wins 0/7 categories
Walbrook Institute London: wins 0/7 categories
Mohammed VI Polytechnic University - UM6P: wins 3/7 categories
University of Kabianga - UoK: wins 1/7 categories
Evelyn Hone College of Applied Arts and Commerce - Ehc: wins 3/7 categories
The Institute of World Politics - IWP: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Stuttgart, Germany
3.90
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Architecture
Santa Barbara, California, United States
4.10
Read more reviews
17 reviews
×
Best programme: Chemistry
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Education
Washington, D.C., United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.94
4.25
Not rated
4.67
Win
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Location
4.16
4.29
Not rated
3.78
4.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.96
4.41
Not rated
4.33
4.29
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.23
3.88
Not rated
4.56
3.71
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.13
4.18
Not rated
4.33
Win
4.20
4.00
Not rated
Value
3.98
4.29
Not rated
4.56
4.43
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.46
3.82
Not rated
4.56
Win
4.50
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High quality of education and contemporary curriculum.
  • +Commitment of professors and strong academic programs.
  • +Diverse student body and international environment.
  • +Quality education and strong academics
  • +Supportive professors and helpful instructors
  • +Diverse culture and vibrant student life

Nothing to show

  • +High quality education and professors
  • +Excellent campus environment and facilities
  • +Global partnerships and industry connections
  • +Practical skills development and hands-on experience
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable lecturers
  • +Affordable education and flexible living costs
  • +Fosters growth and independence through challenging, self-reliant learning.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated system and ineffective career support.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Students are frustrated by outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Students feel there is a lack of support and engaging teaching.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders academic success.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently criticized.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and lacking practical application.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
  • -Students express dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners impressive scores in several key areas, with Internationality (4.225) and Location (4.1625) being particularly well-regarded. Student Life also receives a solid rating (4.125). Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.4625, while Facilities (3.9375) and Professors (3.9625) are rated competently. Value for money is also strong at 3.975.

Academically, the university excels, with Professors receiving a notable 4.41 and Value scoring a high 4.29. Facilities and Location also rank well, both above 4.2. However, Accomodation and Internationality present areas for improvement, with scores of 3.82 and 3.88 respectively. Student Life sits in the middle with a respectable 4.18.

Nothing to show

This university achieves a strong overall rating, with particularly high marks for its **Facilities** (4.67) and excellent scores in **Student Life** (4.33), **Accomodation** (4.56), **Internationality** (4.56), and **Value** (4.56). **Professors** also received a commendable rating (4.33). The **Location** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect at 3.78.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its **location**, receiving the highest rating. **Student life** and **accommodation** also score well, indicating positive experiences in these areas. Conversely, **internationality** is the weakest aspect, suggesting room for improvement in global engagement. Overall, the university presents a solid offering with a few standout features and one area that warrants attention.

This institution excels in several key areas, notably achieving perfect scores for its professors and internationality, alongside a top rating for value. Student life and accommodation are also strengths, both receiving a solid four. Conversely, the university's location received a zero, indicating a significant area for improvement. Facilities also received a moderate rating of three.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 3.9/5 from 10 reviews, ~80% are positive, highlighting quality education and strong PhD programs, with many international students. ~10% of feedback is negative, citing bureaucracy and job prospects.

University of California reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~88%) with students praising quality education, innovative programs, and helpful instructors. A small percentage of feedback mentions challenges with cost of living, workload, and housing.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.56/5 from 9 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~89%). Students praise the high quality of education, strong academic programs, excellent campus facilities, and valuable global partnerships. No negative feedback was reported.

All 7 reviews are positive, with students praising the acquisition of skills, affordability, and knowledgeable, approachable lecturers. The average rating is 4.14 out of 5, with no negative feedback reported.

The university receives positive feedback, with one review rating it 4 out of 5 stars. This positive sentiment represents 100% of the feedback, highlighting a good learning environment that fosters independence and hard work.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
20%
24%
0%
67%
14%
0%
0%
4★
60%
65%
0%
22%
86%
100%
0%
3★
10%
12%
0%
11%
0%
0%
0%
2★
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Flexible programm

I study architecture and this study is structured in a different way in most universities. What I like about the University of Stuttgart is that after obtaining the broad and diverse basics of the study in the first 2 years, you have the freedom to choose your own seminars and projects, concentrating on your point of interest. You can also distribute them as you wish. This is a huge adventure in a field where praxis in an office next to the studies is so important. An international semester is foreseen as well which helps you develop enormously in personal and cultural way.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close