London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of St Andrews vs ONCAMPUS Global vs University of Bradford vs University of Loughborough

Side-by-side comparison from 630 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Le Cordon Bleu Paris (4.70)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 1/7 categories
University of St Andrews: wins 0/7 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 2/7 categories
University of Bradford: wins 0/7 categories
University of Loughborough: wins 3/7 categories
University of Reading: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Saint Andrews, The United Kingdom
4.50
Read more reviews
80 reviews
×
Best programme: History
London, The United Kingdom
4.60
Read more reviews
7 reviews
×
Best programme: University Pathway Programme
Bradford, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
55 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytics
Leicester, The United Kingdom
4.50
Read more reviews
78 reviews
×
Best programme: International Business
Reading, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
77 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
9 reviews
×
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Category ratings
Facilities
4.05
4.29
4.40
4.24
4.70
Win
4.30
4.56
Location
4.78
4.03
4.50
3.85
4.00
4.49
4.78
Win
Professors
4.26
4.51
4.71
Win
4.40
4.25
4.19
4.67
Internationality
4.80
Win
4.44
4.43
4.50
4.36
4.38
4.67
Student life
3.63
4.47
4.40
4.02
4.48
Win
4.23
4.00
Value
4.04
4.38
4.29
4.19
4.39
Win
4.21
4.00
Accommodation
3.79
3.77
4.67
Win
4.00
4.29
4.03
3.22
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Marketable courses and high academic standards
  • +Excellent, expert faculty with industry experience
  • +Supportive, respectful, and flexible learning environment
  • +Inspiring academic environment and dedicated professors
  • +Vibrant student community and sense of belonging
  • +Beautiful campus and engaging course content
  • +Excellent academic preparation and progression support
  • +Supportive and engaging teaching staff
  • +Positive student life and opportunities
  • +Strong academic programmes and valuable knowledge acquisition.
  • +Excellent student support services and approachable staff.
  • +Inclusive and diverse student community.
  • +Strong academic programs with real-world relevance and expert faculty
  • +Vibrant campus life with diverse and collaborative community
  • +Excellent enterprise support and focus on innovation
  • +Supportive community and engaging teaching
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable lecturers
  • +Opportunities for personal and academic growth
  • +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
  • +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
  • +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in programs.
  • -High fees are not justified by the quality of education and support.
  • -Limited social life and inadequate student support services.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Students dislike administrative inefficiencies and poor management.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant concern.
  • -The curriculum and teaching quality are often criticized as being insufficient.
  • -Lack of student support and unresponsiveness from staff.
  • -Disorganization and administrative issues.
  • -Limited learning or academic value.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and insufficient support are prevalent concerns.
  • -Unapproachable and unhelpful staff create a poor learning environment.
  • -Outdated and insufficient facilities hinder student experience.
  • -Lack of university support and student motivation is disappointing.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
Rating summary
What students say

With a strong emphasis on **Internationality** (4.80) and **Location** (4.78), this institution presents a globally connected and well-situated environment. Professors also receive high marks (4.26). Conversely, **Student Life** (3.63) and **Accommodations** (3.79) are the areas with the lowest reported satisfaction, suggesting room for improvement in campus vibrancy and living arrangements.

Notably, the university excels in its **Professors** (4.51) and **Student Life** (4.47), with **Internationality** (4.44) and **Value** (4.38) also receiving very positive scores. **Facilities** (4.29) and **Location** (4.03) are rated well. The lowest-scoring area is **Accomodation** (3.77), indicating room for improvement in this aspect.

This institution receives generally strong ratings from students. The strongest areas are Professors, with an exceptional score of 4.71, closely followed by Accomodation at 4.67 and Location at 4.5. Facilities and Student Life are also well-regarded, both scoring 4.4. The weakest area is Value, though it still holds a respectable 4.29. Internationality also performs well, averaging 4.43.

This institution garners high marks in several key areas, notably **Internationality (4.5)**, followed closely by **Professors (4.40)** and **Facilities (4.24)**. Students also seem satisfied with the **Value (4.19)** and **Student Life (4.02)**. The lowest-rated aspect is **Location (3.85)**, suggesting this might be an area for potential improvement.

Overall, the university scores well across multiple categories. Its strongest area is **Facilities**, boasting an impressive 4.69 average. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, both exceeding 4.3. The lowest-rated aspect is **Location** at 4.0, while other areas like Professors, Accomodation, and Internationality remain solid with scores above 4.2.

This university demonstrates a strong overall performance, particularly excelling in **Location** with a score of 4.49. **Internationality** also received a high rating at 4.38. The lowest-rated area is **Accomodation**, scoring 4.03, though it still remains a positive score. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value all fall within a close and favorable range.

This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~74%) praise marketable courses, expert faculty, and excellent research opportunities. Very few (~3.4%) express concerns about teaching quality, grading consistency, and career services.

Overwhelmingly positive reviews (~95%) praise the beautiful campus, inspiring academic atmosphere, dedicated professors, and diverse student societies. No negative feedback was recorded from the 80 reviews.

All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.57/5. Students praised outstanding teaching staff, excellent academic preparation for university progression, and helpful curriculum.

Over 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent academic and student support, diverse and inclusive communities, and strong nursing programs. A small percentage (~5.5%) express dissatisfaction with disorganization and limited support.

With a ~95% positive sentiment, reviews highlight diverse courses, work experience opportunities, and a vibrant campus. Students appreciate the supportive, collaborative atmosphere and lack of a strong drinking culture. No negative feedback was recorded.

With ~96% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.27/5, students praise supportive communities, knowledgeable lecturers, and engaging courses. A small percentage of reviews mention issues with lecturer approachability and teaching styles.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.

Rating distribution
5★
34%
55%
57%
51%
58%
44%
67%
4★
44%
40%
43%
35%
38%
44%
33%
3★
19%
5%
0%
9%
4%
8%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
2%
0%
3%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
4%
0%
1%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

quality and interesting lecturers with rich use of technology.

My programme is taught by quality lecturers! everyone seems to be very supportive and really interested in your learning. I am enjoying it so far as it is very interactive, they introduce practical examples, and monitor your progress.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close