London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs London South Bank University - LSBU vs University of St Andrews vs Bournemouth University - BU vs Edge Hill University - EHU
Side-by-side comparison from 652 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +Practical, industry-focused academics and supportive, knowledgeable faculty
- +Central London location and excellent, modern facilities/resources
- +Strong student support services and networking opportunities
- +Inspiring academic atmosphere and dedicated professors
- +Strong sense of community and student belonging
- +Beautiful campus and engaging course content
- +Excellent and supportive faculty
- +Modern facilities and campus resources
- +Practical, employability-focused programmes
- +Student-centered support and opportunities
- +Beautiful campus and resources
- +Relevant and industry-experienced lecturers
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
- +Innovative delivery model
- +Accessible, skilled lecturers
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Administrative delays and poor communication.
- -Lack of peer interaction and community building.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.
- -Poor industry preparation and misleading advertising.
- -Inconvenient transport and outdated facilities.
- -Lack of practical application and awareness of available resources.
- -Inadequate support systems for students' needs.
- -Poor administrative responsiveness and management.
- -Lack of comprehensive career guidance beyond specific paths.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are common complaints.
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
This university presents a robust academic environment, with particular strengths in **Location** (4.40) and **Professors** (4.27). **Internationality** also scores well (4.11). Areas for potential improvement include **Student Life** (3.64) and **Accomodation** (3.64), which received the lowest ratings. **Facilities** (4.00) and **Value** (3.93) fall within the mid-range of the provided scores.
Overall, the university demonstrates strong performance in several key areas. Professors and Student Life receive particularly high marks, alongside excellent ratings for Internationality. However, Accomodation emerges as the weakest area, with a notably lower score compared to other categories, while Facilities and Location also present opportunities for improvement.
The university garners positive feedback across numerous aspects, with Student Life achieving the highest rating at 4.2. Professors and Internationality also score well. In contrast, Accomodation presents the lowest score at 3.91, indicating it's the area with the most room for improvement. Facilities, Location, and Value are all rated around 4.0.
Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Facilities**, which received a high rating of 4.38. **Professors** and **Accomodation** also scored well, both above 4.2. Conversely, **Internationality** emerged as the lowest-rated area at 3.56, suggesting room for improvement in global engagement. **Student Life** and **Value** also received respectable, though slightly lower, scores.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
Perceived strengths of this institution lie in its excellent professors, ideal location, and strong international presence, all earning high marks. Student life is identified as a weaker area, receiving a notably lower rating. Other aspects, including facilities, accommodation, and overall value, fall within a positive range.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
Approximately 82% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical academic programs, supportive professors with industry insights, and a great London location. One review, representing ~1.7% of feedback, mentioned challenges with building peer connections during remote learning.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~96% of 79), with students praising the beautiful campus and inspiring academic atmosphere. Professors are noted as knowledgeable and supportive, with excellent course content and abundant student activities. No negative reviews were recorded.
With a 4.08/5 average rating, ~98.6% of reviews are positive, praising modern facilities, supportive staff, and strong academic programs. A small minority (1.4%) noted issues with practical application and transport.
~95% of 40 university reviews are positive, praising student support, campus, and opportunities. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with lecturing and academic support.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
With an average rating of 4/5 and 100% positive feedback, reviews highlight UHI's unique partnership model with colleges. Students appreciate the skilled lecturers and innovative video-conferencing approach connecting diverse locations across Scotland.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Study in London without breaking the bank. One of the best modern universities in the United Kingdom. Great for its global appeal and personal approach to student success even after graduation. Located in the centre of one of the biggest cities in the World.
Nothing to show
I studied the MA 3D Computer Animation at BU. If you are an international student I can't warn you enough about how studying there can be one of the worsts mistakes that you can make in your life. They cherry pick the stories of success. They use the names of the bigs studios for advertising, implicitly or explicitly. They use BFX as an advertising tool for the courses at BU. They say that they will prepare you for the industry in completion of the course, this is absolutely false in my experience. The MA is an introductory course condesed in one year. For an astronomical fee you will learn the basics of the tools and techiques. Things are taught in a rushed manner and sometimes in a mediocre way. Most of the people end the course with the same artistic level that they begin with. You will learn higher education skills that are transfarable to the practice of the profession or other aspects of life. But the price is absolutely not worth it. You can learn the basics of the software and basic techniques from free sources or from a paid source that is an infinitesimal fraction and provide the same or more value. And you can for sure learn the higher education skills that are the most valuable part of the course creating projects by yourself. Most of the international racialized students that I know didn't get into the industry and we were very dissapointed, some of us to the point of depression. It felt like a scam. The teachers don't have a good artistic level and there was a teacher that had a very abussive behaviour. Also, you have to consider that the industry is very discriminatory despite what they say. So if you don't have a European or Canadian passport you will have a difficut time getting a job even in a small studio. The majority of the people working in the studios are white Europeans and North Americans. If you mix a discriminatory industry with a student debt you have a horrible situation. Many of the students that later had success in the industry took further online reputed education like iAnimate or AnimSchool. If you want to become an animator go for this option. Having a MA will give you zero employability advantage. Buy a good computer, get a good subscription, get good online education, do projects by yourself and get feedback. I write this as a way of denouncing my experience there but also to warn you. If you are lucky, you will read this. I would say avoid the MA 3D Computer Animation, and if you don't trust me ask other people I am confident that more people will have the courage to say it. I ended up with an unpayable debt for the minuscule value that I got.
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
