London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Heriot-Watt University - HW vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Brighton School of Business and Management vs University of Worcester
Side-by-side comparison from 567 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +Supportive and approachable staff and technical teams
- +Valuable and recognized academic programmes with international recognition
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth through projects and societies
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Supportive and engaging learning environment with passionate lecturers
- +Diverse and multicultural community fostering inclusivity
- +Well-integrated and relevant course content
- +Supportive and friendly lecturers and staff
- +Welcoming environment and diverse student interactions
- +Excellent academic experience and personalized support
- +Practical, career-focused programs and employability emphasis
- +Supportive and motivating teaching staff
- +Enjoyable study environment and facilities
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of academic support result in unhelpful education.
- -Insufficient or outdated facilities hinder learning and career development opportunities.
- -Administrative issues and lack of clear direction create a confusing and negative experience.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Administrative and communication issues are prevalent.
- -Lack of accreditation and recognition of courses cause problems.
- -Unofficial transcripts and lost time/money are major concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are common complaints.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Course content and teaching quality often fall short of expectations.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
A comprehensive assessment reveals a university with generally positive feedback. Professors are a standout strength, earning the highest score. In contrast, the location received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects. Other areas like facilities, student life, internationality, and value also scored well, demonstrating a solid overall performance. Accommodations also received a respectable, though not top-tier, evaluation.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
This institution presents a consistent profile across most metrics. Its strongest area appears to be accommodation, receiving a solid 3.5 rating. Conversely, facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality are all rated a respectable 3. The university also scores a 3 for overall value, indicating a balanced but not outstanding performance in these key aspects.
This university garners high marks across the board, with professors receiving an outstanding rating of 4.93. Facilities and location are also highly praised, both scoring above 4.7. Student life is also well-regarded. The weakest areas, though still positive, are accommodation and internationality, with scores around 4.3. Overall value is rated at a solid 4.57.
With a standout score for professors, this institution clearly excels in academic instruction. Conversely, facilities present the lowest-rated aspect. Other areas like location and accommodation are well-regarded, suggesting a generally positive student experience, though student life scores are moderate. Internationality and value also receive favorable marks.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good professors, valuable learning, and supportive staff. A small ~1.9% of feedback mentions a lack of course support and teaching, or career/internship opportunities.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
With a 3.67/5 average, ~67% of reviews are positive, praising a supportive learning environment, diverse community, and well-equipped facilities. ~33% of reviews express dissatisfaction, citing procedural issues and unrecognized qualifications.
University of Worcester reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 14 feedback highlighting supportive lecturers, a welcoming environment, and excellent student support. No negative reviews were recorded.
Most reviews are highly positive, rating the university 4.5/5. Students praise practical, career-focused programs, supportive staff, and appealing campuses. No negative feedback was recorded.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Love Heriot Watt! I’ve been studying in the Dubai campus and I’ve now transferred to the Edinburgh one and it’s amazing! The campus has many useful facilities and there always creative events taking place for students to interact.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I have recently completed my nursing degree at the University of Worcester and can honestly say I loved every minute of my time there. The uni itself is a bright and modern space with many facilities on campus, for example, a cafe, Starbucks, Costa, student union, a campus shop, lots of computers, student services, academic writing support etc. The main thing I liked the most about Worcester was the sheer amount of support I received over my three years of nurse training. I went through many tough times both academically and in my personal life and there was always someone there to give me help and support from my personal tutor to student services. The university also has a library on a separate campus not too far away (within walking distance) called the Hive which is a purpose-built university and public library. There are hundreds of computers to use and the variety of books on offer is huge. I always used to go here to do any work as there were quiet areas too. I can’t comment on the accommodation as I lived at home whilst studying, but I have heard good things about the accommodation. In terms of nursing, the university has a small building on the main campus site which is dedicated to nursing and other health courses as it has mannequins where skills can be practised safely in small groups. All the nursing lecturers were amazing, so knowledgeable and approachable. If I want to do a postgraduate course in the future, I will definitely be returning to Worcester. I’m so sad to leave as it has really been the time of my life!
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
