London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Hertfordshire - UH vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Anglia Ruskin University - ARU vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie
Side-by-side comparison from 569 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert, approachable faculty and high-quality teaching
- +Strong career preparation and marketable skills development
- +Excellent facilities and a supportive learning environment
- +Accessible and supportive staff and services.
- +Engaging course content with practical application.
- +Strong sense of community and enjoyable campus life.
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Excellent facilities and convenient location
- +Strong academic and personal development support
- +Supportive and approachable staff
- +Welcoming and friendly campus community
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
- +Rich international environment and diverse student body
- +Personal and professional development opportunities
- +Practical experience through placements and hands-on training
- +Supportive and dedicated lecturers
- +Positive campus environment and community feel
Nothing to show
- -Poor teaching quality and unclear learning expectations.
- -Lack of structure and significant workload.
- -Disappointing careers service and limited social life.
- -Delayed result publication and administrative issues.
- -Poor teaching quality, with professors being unengaged and unapproachable.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
- -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
- -Poor lecture and seminar quality, with some lecturers being unresponsive.
- -Inadequate internet infrastructure causing disruptions, particularly during exams.
- -Administrative issues with incorrect scheduling persisting for extended periods.
- -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
- -Administrative & management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and resources is frequently mentioned.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths in its **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores nearing 4.8. **Professors** also score highly at 4.26. Conversely, **Student Life** is the lowest-rated area, with a score of 3.64, followed by **Accomodation** at 3.79. Other aspects like Facilities and Value fall within a solid mid-range.
This institution garners exceptional marks for Internationality, achieving a standout rating. Professors and Facilities also received very strong evaluations, closely followed by Value and Student Life. Conversely, Location and Accommodations represent the areas with the lowest, though still respectable, scores in this review.
Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.
This university garners strong performance across most assessed areas, with its location receiving the highest mark. Student life and professor quality are also highly rated. Accommodation stands out as the comparatively weakest aspect, though still receiving a respectable score. Internationality and value are also significant strengths.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.
Professors and facilities are highly regarded at this institution, earning top marks. Student life and location also receive favorable reviews. While generally positive, accommodation and value represent the areas with the lowest scores, indicating potential for improvement. Internationality is rated solidly in the middle.
Nothing to show
Nearly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive environment, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent facilities. A small percentage (around 3.4%) mention issues like poor lecturing, inconsistent grading, and lack of social life.
With an average rating of 4.42/5 and 98% positive feedback, students praise a supportive environment, accessible staff, and valuable course content. A small portion (2%) noted issues such as delayed result publication or unengaged professors.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.
Most reviews (approx. 97%) are positive, highlighting a welcoming campus, supportive staff, and engaging learning experiences. A small percentage of feedback (approx. 3%) mentions issues with lecture quality and unreliable internet.
Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
With an average rating of 4.49/5, ~91% of 45 reviews are positive. Students praise the holistic, evidence-based nursing practice, valuable clinical placements, and supportive environment. Some mention inconsistent mentor support and slow administration.
Nothing to show
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
I can boldly say that today my research skills have improved drastically because of the skills I learnt in UH. UH not only gives you an opportunity to grow, it gives you the necessary exposure as a student. With the experience garnered from UH, you can compete anywhere in the world. The tutors are exceptionally qualified and always ready to guide you through. Adaora Nwaka LLM,Energy Law and the Environment.
Nothing to show
I was pleased by the Cambridge Campus, which is pretty lovely. Positives aside, lectures and seminars are of such terrible quality. I feel like I've wasted almost $30,000 and four years. Some of the teachers look careless since they don't reply to emails (of course there are a few good ones as well). The number of students using the internet is too high, and it crashed during an exam, creating issues and unneeded stress. My schedule was still incorrect after three months of study, 90% of my classmates and I didn't have all the modules on our ARU websites, and the grades were supposed to be cleared and published two months before but still hadn't been. Nobody seems to have an explanation or knowledge of the cause of the delays when you query the staff about them. Simply put, this is disorganized.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
