London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs City St George’s, University of London - City vs University of the West of Scotland - UWS vs University of Roehampton vs Ravensbourne University London

Side-by-side comparison from 573 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Le Cordon Bleu Paris (4.60)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 1/7 categories
City St George’s, University of London - City: wins 0/7 categories
University of the West of Scotland - UWS: wins 0/7 categories
University of Roehampton: wins 1/7 categories
Ravensbourne University London: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 1/7 categories
European School of Economics - ESE: wins 4/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Human Resource Management
London, The United Kingdom
4.50
Read more reviews
45 reviews
×
Best programme: Forensic Psychology
London, The United Kingdom
3.90
Read more reviews
13 reviews
×
Best programme: Animation
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Culinary Arts
London, The United Kingdom
4.50
Read more reviews
39 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
4.05
4.35
4.17
4.43
Win
4.23
4.40
4.33
Location
4.78
4.48
3.83
4.48
4.40
4.70
4.79
Win
Professors
4.26
4.21
4.42
4.53
4.08
4.60
Win
4.44
Internationality
4.80
Win
4.33
4.32
4.36
4.00
4.60
4.51
Student life
3.65
4.12
3.50
4.40
3.46
3.90
4.43
Win
Value
4.05
4.12
4.10
4.18
3.85
3.90
4.31
Win
Accommodation
3.80
3.95
3.43
4.02
3.00
3.00
4.11
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
  • +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
  • +Excellent facilities and resources
  • +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable, supportive staff
  • +Excellent location and vibrant surrounding environment
  • +High employability support and valuable internship opportunities
  • +Supportive, knowledgeable, and accessible faculty
  • +Engaging, innovative, and comprehensive course content
  • +Vibrant campus life and diverse student community
  • +Practical experience through placements and hands-on training
  • +Supportive and dedicated lecturers
  • +Positive campus environment and community feel
  • +Industry-focused approach and real-world projects
  • +Modern facilities and high-tech creative equipment
  • +Strong industry connections and career preparation
  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
  • +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
  • +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
  • +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
  • -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
  • -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
  • -Poor teaching quality and low academic standards.
  • -Unmet expectations and perceived focus on profit over student learning.
  • -Inappropriate course focus for experienced professionals.
  • -Lack of academic and administrative support.
  • -Ineffective teaching and unclear assignment guidance.
  • -Insufficient time for major projects.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a major source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and resources is frequently mentioned.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are major concerns.
  • -Ineffective communication and unclear expectations cause confusion and dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
  • -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
Rating summary
What students say

Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.

This institution achieves impressive scores, particularly excelling in its Facilities, rated at 4.35, and Internationality, at 4.33. Student Life and Location also perform well, both above 4.1. The primary area for improvement identified is Accomodation, with a rating of 3.95, representing the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid standing with a slight opportunity for enhancement in student housing.

Demonstrating robust strengths in key areas, this university excels with particularly high marks for its professors and internationality. Facilities and value are also well-regarded. Conversely, student life and accommodation present as areas for potential improvement, receiving the lowest scores. Location also shows room for enhancement.

Professors and facilities are highly regarded at this institution, earning top marks. Student life and location also receive favorable reviews. While generally positive, accommodation and value represent the areas with the lowest scores, indicating potential for improvement. Internationality is rated solidly in the middle.

Assessing various university aspects reveals a mixed picture. The institution excels in its **location**, scoring a high 4.4. **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive strong marks, indicating well-equipped campuses and effective teaching. Student life offers a moderate experience, while **internationality** stands at a solid 4.0. The weakest area is **accommodation**, with a rating of 3, suggesting room for improvement in student housing. Overall value is rated moderately well.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.

With a 4.3/5 average rating from 106 reviews, ~91.5% of students are highly satisfied. Positive feedback highlights strong courses, knowledgeable staff, and ideal city-centre locations. Very few reviews (approx. 1.9%) express dissatisfaction.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting valuable courses, supportive faculty, and a lively student environment. A single negative review mentioned a lack of course support and unhelpful lecturers.

With an average rating of 4.49/5, ~91% of 45 reviews are positive. Students praise the holistic, evidence-based nursing practice, valuable clinical placements, and supportive environment. Some mention inconsistent mentor support and slow administration.

Approximately 100% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-focused learning and modern, inspiring creative facilities. Students appreciate the university's strong industry connections and hands-on approach.

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.

Rating distribution
5★
34%
42%
39%
60%
23%
60%
59%
4★
44%
50%
36%
29%
46%
40%
36%
3★
18%
7%
21%
11%
31%
0%
5%
2★
2%
1%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

The university in general

One positive thing about the university is that they really do emphasise the importance employability and getting that professional experience. I do admire that a lot since they put an importance on preparing students for their future careers. One downside that I have is that there is not much support when it comes to internships and placements which is a bit frustrating since we are left to our own resources. Rather than the university collaborating with companies to make placements mandatory within the course its an option. So we are not guarranted an internship or placement.

More programme coordination

The lecturers in my programme are quite helpful. Would recommend they infuse some kind of practice or practicality into the program. A little bit of programme coordination, and more interaction with peers should be incorporated.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

The amazing professors/teachers there!

First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close