London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs The University of Glasgow - UOFG vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs University of Plymouth vs University of Chester
Side-by-side comparison from 530 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +Approachable, knowledgeable staff and strong academic support
- +Engaging teaching methods and high-quality education
- +Inspiring environment with diverse opportunities
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Engaging and supportive lecturers with real-world expertise
- +Modern, well-equipped facilities and strong academic programs
- +Vibrant city location and convenient student amenities
- +Engaging curriculum with practical applications and hands-on learning
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers passionate about teaching
- +Friendly environment and strong sense of community
- +Supportive staff and wellbeing resources
- +Smooth application process and fast feedback
- +Career coaching and employable skills development
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Uninspiring or irrelevant theoretical lectures
- -Poorly organized and frequently changing class timetables
- -Lack of practical relevance for experienced professionals
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Administrative & management issues are a common source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a significant complaint.
- -Poor quality teaching and unhelpful instructors.
- -Lack of social integration and pressure to conform.
- -Administrative and management issues caused significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance were major drawbacks.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty was a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths across multiple aspects. Its location stands out as exceptionally well-regarded, alongside strong performances in student life, professors, and internationality. While most areas received positive feedback, accommodation presented a comparatively weaker area, receiving the lowest rating. Overall, the university offers a well-rounded experience, with notable excellence in its environment and academic staff, though improvements may be beneficial in student housing.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
Overall, the university garners solid reviews. Its **location** is particularly lauded, receiving the highest score. **Student life** and **facilities** also rate highly, indicating a vibrant and well-equipped campus environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, suggesting room for improvement in student housing. Ratings for professors, internationality, and value fall within the good to very good range.
This institution receives particularly strong marks for its **Professors**, who are rated highly. **Student Life** presents the lowest score among the surveyed aspects. Other areas like Facilities, Location, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are generally well-regarded, falling within a positive range. The overall sentiment suggests a well-rounded university experience with a particular strength in its academic staff.
This institution shines in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its facilities and location, alongside excellent marks for internationality and value. Student life receives a solid rating. However, accommodation stands out as a weaker point, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Professors are also highly regarded.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
With ~87% positive feedback, reviews highlight good lecturers, course options, and helpful staff. A small amount of negative feedback mentions disorganized timetables and some theoretical courses lacking practicality.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
~83% of 29 reviews are positive (4-5 stars). Students praise the university's location, modern facilities, and supportive staff. No negative feedback was recorded.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting well-designed courses and supportive lecturers. A small minority of feedback, around 2.6%, expressed dissatisfaction with the academic program and social environment.
All five reviews are positive, with students praising supportive staff and departments, smooth application processes, and helpful career coaching. Resources like a large library and advance module content are also highlighted.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
During my four years studying Sociology at the University of Glasgow, I had a truly positive experience. Located in the heart of the West End, the university's setting is not just convenient but also vibrant, offering a great blend of academic and social opportunities. The course structure and the format of the exams were aspects I particularly appreciated. They provided a straightforward and effective way to assess our understanding and knowledge, with exams during my time at Glasgow Uni being primarily online. The lecturers were always approachable and willing to help, which made a significant difference in my academic journey. Their support and guidance were invaluable, especially when looking at challenging topics or seeking advice on assignments. A great aspect of my Sociology degree was the wide variety of courses available, allowing me to tailor my studies to my interests. This variety ensured there was always something I was keen to study, not only keeping me interested but broadening my academic horizons. The flexibility offered by lecturers in choosing essay topics was especially beneficial, enabling me to explore issues that I was most passionate about and engage deeply with the material. Additionally, the flexible nature of the degree programs, which allow students to explore different subjects in the first two years is another highlight of Glasgow University. This allows you a bit of time to figure out what you want your final degree subject to be, as well as allowing you to develop skills in multiple fields. Additionally, the university's facilities, from the gym to the study spaces and the library, were great. I spent many productive hours in the library, making the most of the resources available. The opportunity to engage in various sports and activities, along with the vibrant student unions, added a lot to my university life. Also living in Murano, one of the student accommodations was a highlight of my university experience. It was a busy and sometimes chaotic time but it was where I met the friends I went on to live with for the rest of my degree and beyond. However, the experience wasn't without its challenges. Issues like strikes and marking boycotts resulted in significantly delayed degree results and coupled with poor communication on this industrial action, dampened my graduation. Also, while most courses were excellently taught, there were a few that didn't quite meet the same standard. Despite these cons, my time at the University of Glasgow was incredibly rewarding, and I would highly recommend it to anyone considering studying there.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
It’s a good place to study with lots of activities to do do and with a lot of useful resources as they have a 4 floor library which is great to find studies or even a quite place to study. The modules are set out perfectly with all the content already put up in advance for the students to have a look at so that they can study in advance and have a look through before lessons.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
