London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs London Metropolitan University vs Goldsmiths University of London - Gold vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris
Side-by-side comparison from 438 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Marketable courses and high academic standards
- +Excellent, expert faculty with industry experience
- +Supportive, respectful, and flexible learning environment
- +Supportive and accessible faculty and staff
- +Diverse and multicultural environment
- +Career-focused and practical learning opportunities
- +Intellectually stimulating and academically sound programmes
- +Knowledgeable, supportive, and approachable lecturers
- +Interdisciplinary approach and encouragement of independent thought
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Well-organized courses and learning resources
- +Personal and academic development
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
Nothing to show
- +Outstanding national and international reputation
- +Transformative personal development and gained confidence
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in programs.
- -High fees are not justified by the quality of education and support.
- -Limited social life and inadequate student support services.
- -Unprofessional teaching and poorly structured courses.
- -Inadequate facilities and lack of support from the program office.
- -Insufficient preparation for the real working world.
- -Disorganized academic structure and persistent strikes disrupt learning.
- -Uninspiring teaching and biased academic perspectives are prevalent.
- -Inconsistent grading and a cliquey environment hinder student success.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant concern.
- -Lack of adequate resources and support hinders academic progress.
With a strong emphasis on **Internationality** (4.80) and **Location** (4.78), this institution presents a globally connected and well-situated environment. Professors also receive high marks (4.26). Conversely, **Student Life** (3.63) and **Accommodations** (3.79) are the areas with the lowest reported satisfaction, suggesting room for improvement in campus vibrancy and living arrangements.
This institution receives outstanding marks for its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.5. **Professors** are also highly regarded, with a rating of over 4.3. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the lowest-rated aspect, falling below 3.5. Other categories like Facilities, Student Life, and Value are rated moderately well, generally ranging from approximately 3.9 to 4.1.
Overall, this institution garners strong marks across several key areas. Internationality and Professors stand out with particularly high ratings, suggesting a robust global presence and an excellent teaching staff. Student Life also receives a favorable score. However, Accommodations appear to be the weakest area, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. The university also scored well in Facilities, Location, and Value.
Overall, this institution garners favorable reviews across multiple aspects. The highest-rated areas are Professors (4.75) and Location (4.73), indicating significant strengths in these domains. Conversely, Facilities (4.3) and Accomodation (4.27) received the lowest scores, suggesting these might be areas for potential improvement. Student Life and Internationality also scored highly.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
Nothing to show
Exceptional student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are clear strengths for this university, all receiving perfect scores. Professors and facilities are also well-regarded with a 4 out of 5. The only area falling short is location, which received a zero, indicating a significant weakness in this aspect.
Most reviews (~74%) praise marketable courses, expert faculty, and excellent research opportunities. Very few (~3.4%) express concerns about teaching quality, grading consistency, and career services.
Approximately 93% of reviews are positive, highlighting diverse courses, supportive mentors, and welcoming staff. A small percentage of feedback (~7%) mentions issues with course structure and facilities.
~95.8% of reviews are positive, highlighting intellectually stimulating programmes, supportive and knowledgeable lecturers, and a focus on critical thinking and independent learning. A small amount of negative feedback mentions disorganized departments and lack of timely marking.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), highlighting excellent teaching, supportive staff, and well-organized courses that improve language and academic skills. Minor scheduling changes were the only noted inconvenience.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
Nothing to show
The single review is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive, with no negative reviews reported.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
LondonMet is a great place to have an international experience for foreign students @ different levels. Whether you may search for an affordable and certified executive studies or you may search for a multicultural experience meeting people from all over the world. I personally, find it a great option for a post graduate level of studies.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
