London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Birmingham vs The University of Glasgow - UOFG vs Falmouth University vs University of Loughborough

Side-by-side comparison from 784 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Le Cordon Bleu Paris (4.60)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 2/7 categories
University of Birmingham: wins 0/7 categories
The University of Glasgow - UOFG: wins 0/7 categories
Falmouth University: wins 0/7 categories
University of Loughborough: wins 4/7 categories
University of Bolton: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Birmingham, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
181 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Glasgow, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
122 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
Falmouth, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
46 reviews
×
Best programme: Theatre Arts
Leicester, The United Kingdom
4.50
Read more reviews
78 reviews
×
Best programme: International Business
Manchester, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
21 reviews
×
Best programme: Cloud and Network Security
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Category ratings
Facilities
4.05
4.37
4.34
4.24
4.70
Win
4.41
4.40
Location
4.78
Win
4.43
4.60
4.00
4.00
4.24
4.70
Professors
4.26
4.17
4.40
4.20
4.25
4.18
4.60
Win
Internationality
4.80
Win
4.29
4.35
4.07
4.36
3.91
4.60
Student life
3.64
4.28
4.43
4.18
4.48
Win
4.09
3.90
Value
4.04
4.04
4.19
4.07
4.39
Win
4.32
3.90
Accommodation
3.79
3.93
3.61
3.76
4.29
Win
3.55
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert, approachable faculty and high-quality teaching
  • +Strong career preparation and marketable skills development
  • +Excellent facilities and a supportive learning environment
  • +Beautiful campus and engaging, practical courses.
  • +Excellent, expert teaching and student support.
  • +Well-structured programmes with real-world application.
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable lecturers
  • +Strong academic support and helpful staff
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
  • +Hands-on experience and industry opportunities
  • +Supportive faculty and accessible help
  • +Flexible course structure and modern facilities
  • +Strong academic programs with real-world relevance and expert faculty
  • +Vibrant campus life with diverse and collaborative community
  • +Excellent enterprise support and focus on innovation
  • +Passionate and supportive lecturers
  • +Good course content and practical learning
  • +Excellent facilities and campus environment
  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and unclear learning expectations.
  • -Lack of structure and significant workload.
  • -Disappointing careers service and limited social life.
  • -Poor disability and mental health support services.
  • -Inadequate course delivery, including overcrowded lectures and lack of seminars.
  • -Mismanagement of student organizations and unprofessional lecturer conduct.
  • -Inconsistent and impractical lecture content, especially for experienced students.
  • -Poorly organized and frequently changing class timetables.
  • -Issues with administrative and management teamwork.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are consistently criticized.
  • -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and insufficient support are prevalent concerns.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
  • -Administrative inefficiencies and communication problems cause frustration.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and lack of personalized attention hinder learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths in its **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores nearing 4.8. **Professors** also score highly at 4.26. Conversely, **Student Life** is the lowest-rated area, with a score of 3.64, followed by **Accomodation** at 3.79. Other aspects like Facilities and Value fall within a solid mid-range.

With a strong showing across most aspects, the university excels particularly in **Location**, earning the highest rating. **Facilities** and **Internationality** also receive very favorable scores. The **Value** proposition is solid, and **Student Life** is well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents as the area with the most room for improvement, scoring the lowest among the surveyed metrics. **Professors** are rated positively, though slightly below some other categories.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Location**, which received the highest rating. **Student Life** and **Professors** also scored very well, reflecting positive experiences in these key areas. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the lowest-rated aspect, indicating room for improvement. Other categories like Facilities, Internationality, and Value received solid, above-average scores, suggesting a generally well-rounded university experience.

This institution demonstrates a strong showing in key areas, with **Facilities** receiving the highest rating at 4.24. **Professors** and **Student Life** also score well, both exceeding 4.1. Notably, **Accomodation** emerges as the area with the lowest rating, registering at 3.76. Other aspects like Location, Internationality, and Value are all rated solidly around the 4.0 mark.

Overall, the university scores well across multiple categories. Its strongest area is **Facilities**, boasting an impressive 4.69 average. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, both exceeding 4.3. The lowest-rated aspect is **Location** at 4.0, while other areas like Professors, Accomodation, and Internationality remain solid with scores above 4.2.

Performance is notably strong in Facilities, achieving a rating of 4.41. Value and Location also received high marks, at 4.32 and 4.24 respectively. Student Life and Internationality are rated solidly, around 4.09 and 3.91. The area with the lowest score is Accomodation, at 3.55.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nearly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive environment, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent facilities. A small percentage (around 3.4%) mention issues like poor lecturing, inconsistent grading, and lack of social life.

With ~82% positive feedback and an average 4.17/5 rating, students praise beautiful campuses and quality teaching across diverse courses. A small ~1.7% of reviews cite concerns with specific departments or support services.

Over 100 reviews show a 4.29 average rating, with ~97.5% positive feedback highlighting good lecturers, course options, and helpful staff. A few negative comments mention timetable issues and program relevance.

Nearly all of the 46 reviews are positive, highlighting supportive faculty and excellent facilities. Students appreciate the hands-on experience and opportunities offered, with no negative feedback recorded.

With a ~95% positive sentiment, reviews highlight diverse courses, work experience opportunities, and a vibrant campus. Students appreciate the supportive, collaborative atmosphere and lack of a strong drinking culture. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.38/5, ~90% of reviews are positive, praising passionate lecturers and good learning experiences tailored to industry standards. There is minimal negative feedback.

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

Rating distribution
5★
34%
38%
44%
35%
58%
48%
60%
4★
44%
43%
43%
52%
38%
43%
40%
3★
18%
18%
10%
13%
4%
10%
0%
2★
2%
1%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
1%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Nothing to show

Top Academics & Lively Social Scene at Glasgow Uni

During my four years studying Sociology at the University of Glasgow, I had a truly positive experience. Located in the heart of the West End, the university's setting is not just convenient but also vibrant, offering a great blend of academic and social opportunities. The course structure and the format of the exams were aspects I particularly appreciated. They provided a straightforward and effective way to assess our understanding and knowledge, with exams during my time at Glasgow Uni being primarily online. The lecturers were always approachable and willing to help, which made a significant difference in my academic journey. Their support and guidance were invaluable, especially when looking at challenging topics or seeking advice on assignments. A great aspect of my Sociology degree was the wide variety of courses available, allowing me to tailor my studies to my interests. This variety ensured there was always something I was keen to study, not only keeping me interested but broadening my academic horizons. The flexibility offered by lecturers in choosing essay topics was especially beneficial, enabling me to explore issues that I was most passionate about and engage deeply with the material. Additionally, the flexible nature of the degree programs, which allow students to explore different subjects in the first two years is another highlight of Glasgow University. This allows you a bit of time to figure out what you want your final degree subject to be, as well as allowing you to develop skills in multiple fields. Additionally, the university's facilities, from the gym to the study spaces and the library, were great. I spent many productive hours in the library, making the most of the resources available. The opportunity to engage in various sports and activities, along with the vibrant student unions, added a lot to my university life. Also living in Murano, one of the student accommodations was a highlight of my university experience. It was a busy and sometimes chaotic time but it was where I met the friends I went on to live with for the rest of my degree and beyond. However, the experience wasn't without its challenges. Issues like strikes and marking boycotts resulted in significantly delayed degree results and coupled with poor communication on this industrial action, dampened my graduation. Also, while most courses were excellently taught, there were a few that didn't quite meet the same standard. Despite these cons, my time at the University of Glasgow was incredibly rewarding, and I would highly recommend it to anyone considering studying there.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close