London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs The University of Edinburgh vs University of Sunderland vs Manchester Metropolitan University vs Hartpury College
Side-by-side comparison from 672 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Marketable courses and high academic standards
- +Excellent, expert faculty with industry experience
- +Supportive, respectful, and flexible learning environment
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Vibrant community and social opportunities.
- +Academic growth and valuable experiences.
- +Practical, UK-standard curriculum with critical thinking focus
- +Supportive, knowledgeable, and accessible faculty
- +Welcoming and supportive environment for international students
- +Informative and relevant courses with practical application
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Welcoming environment and engaging campus activities
- +Attentive and helpful lecturers fostering a fun learning environment
- +Excellent facilities and attractive campus with social spaces
- +Beneficial combination of subject specializations and flexible learning methods
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
- +Practical, industry-focused courses
- +Supportive and knowledgeable staff
- +Diverse and inclusive student community
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in programs.
- -High fees are not justified by the quality of education and support.
- -Limited social life and inadequate student support services.
- -Lack of program improvement and unmet expectations.
- -High costs and limited ethnic diversity.
- -University relying on prestige over student experience enhancements.
- -Insufficient lecturers and inadequate course delivery
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Unclear communication and lack of student involvement
- -Negative teaching quality and unclear assignments.
- -Administrative and management issues, including unfair marking.
- -Lack of support and a poor learning environment.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and equipment
- -Lack of clear communication and support
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
With a strong emphasis on **Internationality** (4.80) and **Location** (4.78), this institution presents a globally connected and well-situated environment. Professors also receive high marks (4.26). Conversely, **Student Life** (3.63) and **Accommodations** (3.79) are the areas with the lowest reported satisfaction, suggesting room for improvement in campus vibrancy and living arrangements.
This institution garners strong acclaim, particularly for its **Location**, which received the highest rating. Student Life and Internationality also scored very well. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents as the weakest area, with a notably lower score compared to other aspects. Facilities, Professors, and Value fall within a respectable middle range.
This university demonstrates considerable strengths in its **facilities**, scoring a high 4.52. **Professors** also receive positive recognition with a rating of 4.44. Areas that could benefit from further development include **accommodation**, which received the lowest rating at 3.75. Overall, the university presents a generally favorable image with solid scores in location, student life, internationality, and value.
This university demonstrates strong performance in several key areas, with **Location** receiving the highest rating at 4.66 and **Facilities** closely following at 4.55. Student life and the academic staff also scored well. The university's weakest area appears to be **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.93. Overall, the institution presents a well-rounded experience, with the value for money and international presence also being positively regarded.
Exceptional scores highlight this institution's strengths. Facilities, professors, and location all receive a perfect 5, indicating superior resources, academic quality, and geographical advantages. Student life and accommodation are also well-regarded with a 4. Internationality also scores a strong 5. The only area showing slight room for improvement is student life and accommodation, both rated 4, though the overall value is also very high at 4.5.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
Considerable strengths are evident in the university's **Internationality**, scoring a high 4.625, closely followed by its **Location** at 4.5. Ratings for **Facilities** and **Professors** are also robust, both at 4.4375. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest score, registering at 3.8125, with **Accomodation** also receiving a comparatively lower rating of 3.9375. **Value** sits comfortably in the mid-range at 4.25.
Most reviews (~74%) praise marketable courses, expert faculty, and excellent research opportunities. Very few (~3.4%) express concerns about teaching quality, grading consistency, and career services.
With a 4.3/5 average rating from 129 reviews, ~84% are positive, highlighting engaging lectures, supportive faculty, and ample opportunities. A single negative review (~0.8%) noted program limitations and limited ethnic diversity.
With a ~84% positive sentiment, students highlight valuable experiences, practical skills, and supportive lecturers. A small fraction (~1.6%) of reviews noted insufficient lecturers or a course not meeting expectations.
With an average rating of 4.38/5, ~88% of reviews are positive, praising good courses, helpful lecturers, and a welcoming atmosphere. ~1.5% of feedback is negative, citing unhelpful tutors and questionable assignments.
With an average rating of 5/5 from two reviews, students are highly positive. Recurring themes include attentive lecturers and excellent facilities. There is no negative feedback.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
Nearly all (approx. 100%) reviews are highly positive, with students praising practical courses, supportive lecturers, and a diverse, inclusive environment. No negative feedback was recorded.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Overall the university is good, they have an easy way to apply for extensions on coursework, and special circumstances, which my personal tutor was more than happy to help with, she really was the best. My supervisor for my dissertation was also really supportive and helped through the challenging times. The lecturers are usually helpful if you are stuck, but there were some who would do the bare minimum for the students.
Nothing to show
I thoroughly love my university. They are so helpful with any problem or situation. Great location and everyone is lovely Always wants the best for students and the facilities are fantastic. They use an app called moodle so you can access lectures PowerPoint slides coursework exams the lot. Student hubs are available across campus to talk to people about any issues you have wether it’s financial issues to mental health issues. Some buildings possibly good be re built/ re decorated to be modernised.
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
I am an international student who came from nepal to get education here. I have met new people and new friends. The teachers have been very helpful and are always teaching me new stuff. The university here i very nice and there is always new stuff to learn
