London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs University of Plymouth vs University of West London vs University of Roehampton

Side-by-side comparison from 466 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Le Cordon Bleu Paris (4.70)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 1/7 categories
EM Normandie - EM Normandie: wins 0/7 categories
University of Plymouth: wins 0/7 categories
University of West London: wins 0/7 categories
University of Roehampton: wins 2/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 1/7 categories
Plymouth Marjon University: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: MSc International Logistics and Port Management
Plymouth, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
29 reviews
×
Best programme: Animal Science
London, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
51 reviews
×
Best programme: Artificial Intelligence
London, The United Kingdom
4.50
Read more reviews
45 reviews
×
Best programme: Forensic Psychology
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
9 reviews
×
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Plymouth, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Digital Media
Category ratings
Facilities
4.04
4.00
4.21
4.47
4.44
4.56
Win
4.33
Location
4.78
3.57
4.43
4.48
4.47
4.78
5.00
Win
Professors
4.26
4.00
4.11
4.48
4.53
4.67
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.80
Win
4.14
3.93
4.49
4.36
4.67
4.33
Student life
3.63
3.71
4.39
4.25
4.40
Win
4.00
4.00
Value
4.04
4.00
4.11
4.35
4.18
4.00
4.67
Win
Accommodation
3.78
3.50
3.64
3.93
4.02
Win
3.22
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert and experienced faculty
  • +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
  • +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
  • +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
  • +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
  • +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
  • +Engaging and supportive lecturers with real-world expertise
  • +Modern, well-equipped facilities and strong academic programs
  • +Vibrant city location and convenient student amenities
  • +Industry connections and career opportunities
  • +Engaging and relevant curriculum
  • +Supportive staff and positive campus environment
  • +Practical experience through placements and hands-on training
  • +Supportive and dedicated lecturers
  • +Positive campus environment and community feel
  • +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
  • +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
  • +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
  • +Supportive and approachable staff and lecturers
  • +Strong emphasis on practical learning and career preparation
  • +Personalized attention due to small class sizes and a close-knit community
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
  • -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
  • -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
  • -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a common source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a significant complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues create frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content is irrelevant or outdated.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a major source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and resources is frequently mentioned.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and transparency from leadership is a recurring problem.
Rating summary
What students say

Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.

This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.

Overall, the university garners solid reviews. Its **location** is particularly lauded, receiving the highest score. **Student life** and **facilities** also rate highly, indicating a vibrant and well-equipped campus environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, suggesting room for improvement in student housing. Ratings for professors, internationality, and value fall within the good to very good range.

This university demonstrates strong performance in several key areas, with exceptionally high marks for Internationality (4.49) and Professors (4.48). Facilities and Location also received very favorable scores. Student Life and Value are well-regarded, though Accomodation presents as the weakest area with a rating of 3.93.

Professors and facilities are highly regarded at this institution, earning top marks. Student life and location also receive favorable reviews. While generally positive, accommodation and value represent the areas with the lowest scores, indicating potential for improvement. Internationality is rated solidly in the middle.

This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.

With top marks in **Professors** and **Location**, this institution shines. **Facilities** and **Internationality** also received strong scores. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** earned solid, albeit lower, ratings. The primary area for potential improvement seems to be the facilities, which, while good, are not as outstanding as other aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.

Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.

~83% of 29 reviews are positive (4-5 stars). Students praise the university's location, modern facilities, and supportive staff. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a 4.45/5 average rating from 51 reviews, ~88% of feedback is positive. Students frequently praise the great experiences, strong industry connections leading to job placements, relevant curriculum, and supportive staff. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.49/5, ~91% of 45 reviews are positive. Students praise the holistic, evidence-based nursing practice, valuable clinical placements, and supportive environment. Some mention inconsistent mentor support and slow administration.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.

Students praise Marjon University for its strong support systems and approachable, supportive lecturers (~100%). They highlight a close-knit community feel with personalized attention and modern facilities. Practical learning and great sports amenities are also appreciated.

Rating distribution
5★
34%
43%
38%
57%
60%
67%
33%
4★
44%
29%
41%
31%
29%
33%
67%
3★
19%
14%
21%
12%
11%
0%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close