London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Swansea University vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Abertay University vs University of Wales Trinity Saint David
Side-by-side comparison from 446 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +Supportive, approachable faculty and academic staff
- +Practical, hands-on learning and application of knowledge
- +Accessible resources and support networks
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Supportive and collaborative academic environment
- +High-quality teaching and approachable staff
- +Practical and industry-focused curriculum
- +Supportive teaching and individual attention
- +Practical learning and real-world application
- +Friendly community and valuable life skills
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
- +Supportive and accessible staff, fostering a welcoming environment.
- +Flexible course design and resources catering to diverse student needs.
- +Small, community-focused campus with valuable practical experience.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Safety concerns and crime.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and resources negatively impacts the student experience.
- -Online delivery of courses and poor career support.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
This institution garners impressive scores across multiple aspects, with particularly strong showings in **Value** (4.52) and **Professors** (4.44), as well as a notable rating for **Internationality** (4.42). Conversely, **Accomodation** presents a relative weakness, scoring 3.81. Other areas like Facilities, Location, and Student Life also received solid, positive feedback, generally exceeding the 4.2 mark.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
Across various aspects, this institution garners solid feedback. Location and value stand out as its strongest points, both receiving ratings above 4.3. Student life and professors are also highly regarded. Accommodations represent the weakest area with the lowest score, though still a respectable 4.15. Facilities and internationality also score well, indicating a generally positive student experience.
A comprehensive evaluation reveals a university excelling in several key areas. Location and professors received the highest marks, indicating strong student satisfaction with the campus surroundings and academic instruction. Conversely, accommodation and student life are rated slightly lower, suggesting potential areas for improvement. The university also performs well in facilities, internationality, and value.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings, with professors receiving an outstanding 4.6 rating. Student life also scores well at 3.8. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in accommodation and location, both rated at 3.4 and 3.5 respectively, suggesting these are aspects that could be improved. Facilities and internationality present a solid middle ground, with ratings of 4.2 and 3.7.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~98%), highlighting engaging teaching, practical modules, and supportive staff. A small percentage of negative feedback noted safety concerns on campus.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
With 22 positive reviews out of 23, students praise the supportive academic environment, knowledgeable lecturers, and helpful resources. The learning experience is generally rated highly, with ~0% negative feedback.
With ~69% positive reviews and an average rating of 4.25/5, students praise strong teaching, supportive environments, and practical learning, particularly in creative fields. A small amount of negative feedback mentioned disappointing online learning experiences.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
With an average rating of 4.1/5 and ~80% positive feedback, students highlight supportive staff, good study materials, and accommodating environments for diverse needs. Minor points on course content choice were mentioned.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Currently having a great time at Swansea. Currently studying history and can say that the lecturers for the most part are very helpful. I do feel the choice is relatively Eurocentric but still good. Good nightlife too.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The University of Wales Trinity Saint David is a good university for students who want strong teaching, smaller classes, and a supportive environment, especially in creative or applied subjects. However, it may not be the best choice if you are looking for high global prestige, major research opportunities, or a big city student experience.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
I liked the respect toward students and modules, and the course was designed to help busy parents and workers. Excellent staff on campus to take care of students' needs and professional tutors. Library and IT lab in our campus, good study material and one to one tuition.
