London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs ONCAMPUS Global vs University of Cumbria vs Brunel Business School vs London Academy of Trading - LAT
Side-by-side comparison from 367 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert, approachable faculty and high-quality teaching
- +Strong career preparation and marketable skills development
- +Excellent facilities and a supportive learning environment
- +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
- +Academic and personal growth opportunities
- +Diverse student community and good facilities
- +Practical, career-focused programs and employability emphasis
- +Supportive and motivating teaching staff
- +Enjoyable study environment and facilities
- +Applied learning and relevant coursework
- +Strong employability and career support
- +Flexible schedules and learning resources
Nothing to show
- +UK qualifications, global presence
- +Great teaching, tutors, and modules
- +Accommodating staff and extracurricular opportunities
Nothing to show
- -Poor teaching quality and unclear learning expectations.
- -Lack of structure and significant workload.
- -Disappointing careers service and limited social life.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of communication and transparency is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Course content and teaching quality often fall short of expectations.
- -Unclear communication and bureaucratic processes.
- -Lack of modern resources and support.
- -Outdated facilities and infrastructure.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths in its **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores nearing 4.8. **Professors** also score highly at 4.26. Conversely, **Student Life** is the lowest-rated area, with a score of 3.64, followed by **Accomodation** at 3.79. Other aspects like Facilities and Value fall within a solid mid-range.
A robust profile emerges, with exceptional marks for its professors, location, and student life. The university also scores well in internationality and value. Conversely, facilities and accommodation received slightly lower, though still positive, ratings, representing the areas with the most room for improvement.
With a standout score for professors, this institution clearly excels in academic instruction. Conversely, facilities present the lowest-rated aspect. Other areas like location and accommodation are well-regarded, suggesting a generally positive student experience, though student life scores are moderate. Internationality and value also receive favorable marks.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its faculty, with professors receiving a high rating of 4.29. Student life also scores well at 4.08, alongside a strong internationality rating of 4.14. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.0. Conversely, location appears to be the least favored aspect, scoring 3.25. Facilities are moderately rated at 3.85, and accommodation also receives a respectable 3.79.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Location**, receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75, and its **Facilities**, rated at 4.5. Areas for potential improvement are **Accommodations** and **Internationality**, both scoring 3.75. Other categories like Professors, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid range, indicating a generally positive university experience.
Nothing to show
Nearly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive environment, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent facilities. A small percentage (around 3.4%) mention issues like poor lecturing, inconsistent grading, and lack of social life.
With an average rating of 4.74/5 from 19 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students praise supportive and knowledgeable lecturers, helpful academic support, good facilities, and a diverse community. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
Most reviews are highly positive, rating the university 4.5/5. Students praise practical, career-focused programs, supportive staff, and appealing campuses. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.64/5 from 14 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise applied learning, employability skills, and support for international students. There are no negative reviews.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise excellent teaching, supportive staff, and diverse educational perspectives. Some minor feedback notes limited cafeteria food options.
Nothing to show
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
When I attended Pearson, it was relatively new and small. This meant that you could build good relationships with staff and tutors and be able to access any help you needed easily. However, despite how new the business school was, any criticism such as the course structure was unwelcome and always argued with. As each year passed the number of new students in each year increased significantly which caused problems with access to both tutors and quiet study spaces as they only had 2 floors and a basement which was shared with Pearson staff. As for the tutors, I received lectures and seminars from some amazing people who were extremely knowledgeable in accounting and made it so much easier to understand. However, being such a new school they hired tutors who they eventually found out - too late might I add - did not fit the role. Nothing was put in place to help rectify the fact that students had received sub-par teaching. Before attending Pearson College, they bragged about their business workshops and connections. Throughout my time at Pearson, I soon discovered that these workshops were few and far between but more importantly, they were often unrelated to my course or fully booked. One highlight is the fact that they added an office space for a start-up business to work and students were able to gain some experience working with them. Moving onto the facilities of the college, there's really not much to talk about. There's limited space at the campus, especially with the growing number of students. There used to be quiet study rooms for students but they were then taken and used as offices for the growing number of staff. Understandably they need office space but it's very hard to study without quiet spaces such as a library. Lastly, the degrees are validated by the University of Kent which although it gives you faith in the programme you are studying, you are faced with extended wait times for results compared to other universities which is especially frustrating in your final year.
Nothing to show
