London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs ONCAMPUS Global vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs London Academy of Trading - LAT vs Wrexham Glyndwr University
Side-by-side comparison from 370 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Excellent facilities and convenient location
- +Strong academic and personal development support
- +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
- +Rich international environment and diverse student body
- +Personal and professional development opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Amazing and supportive staff
- +Positive learning experience and engaging courses
- +Beautiful campus environment
- +engaging and clear teaching
- +helpful feedback and support
- +well-organized and comprehensive curriculum
- +Flexible scheduling and ability to tailor projects
- +Comprehensive content and portfolio building
- +Personalized one-to-one tutor support and mentorship
- -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
- -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
- -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
- -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
- -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
Nothing to show
- -administrative & management issues
- -outdated facilities
- -lack of effective communication
- -Misleading course accreditation and aggressive company response
- -Poor course delivery and unfulfilled promises
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Excessive and confusing administrative processes cause frustration.
- -Lack of resources and limited support for students are frequently mentioned.
Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.
Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Location**, earning a perfect score, and **Professors**, receiving a high rating. Areas such as **Student Life** and **Internationality** also stand out positively. However, the university's **Value** is rated as its weakest point, with a score of 3. Facilities and accommodation received moderate, middle-ground scores.
Across all evaluated aspects, this institution received a uniform rating. Its strengths and weaknesses are therefore equally represented, with all categories achieving the same score. The consistent marks suggest a balanced experience, with no single area significantly outperforming or lagging behind others according to the given data.
This institution garners universal praise, achieving perfect scores across all evaluated aspects. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. This indicates exceptional strength in every area with no identified weaknesses, presenting a comprehensively outstanding university experience.
Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.
Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, these two reviews are entirely positive. Students highlighted stunning facilities and friendly people. Brilliant lecturers and insightful courses were also noted.
The single review is negative, with an average rating of 1/5. It highlights issues with course accreditation not matching advertised claims and experiencing aggressive communication.
All 12 reviews are positive, with students praising flexibility, one-to-one tutor support, and portfolio development. The average rating is 5/5.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This is one of the worst companies I have ever had to deal with. I signed up to a course and they delivered something that didn’t fit the description. I contacted BACP and they confirmed that the course was not accredited even though they advertise that it is. There was an awful lot of drama with them and they had been threatening me and trying to intimidate me about leaving a review. I decided to check my reviews on this particular site and came across this one and decided to leave an update that they took no action and it was just threats. Here they come again into my person email trying to intimidate me and threaten me. This type of behaviour won’t be tolerated. I am taking further action and spreading more awareness. The details of the course studied on the next page isn’t accurate for my review. My course isn’t listed. I just needed to spread awareness of my experience and what other students are going through.
Creative Design School (CDS) could not have been a more perfect fit for my plan to embark on a career change to graphic design. The key factors that lead to me enrolling on their Graphic Design Level 2 course was the flexibility of the course (allowing me to work full-time whilst studying), the reasonable course fee and a friendly, no-pressure Skype with the school to explain my situation and see if this would work for me. The course covers the key principles of graphic design and each module presents real-life scenario tasks that build up your portfolio while learning at the same time. I've surprised myself at how my skills have developed as I complete each module. The real bonus to studying with CDS is the amazing 1-to-1 tuition. My tutor, Pete, is always on hand to help, support and encourage me to push my creative boundaries. Having dedicated, personal tuition from someone with such knowledge of the industry is priceless. I would highly recommend this course and studying with CDS in general. I've enjoyed and gained so much from this course that I've already signed up to the Visual Communications course.
