The University of Manchester vs Alliance Manchester Business School vs Manchester Metropolitan University vs Salford Business School vs The University of Law Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 483 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Inspiring and engaging learning environment with supportive and responsive tutors.
- +Vibrant student life and social experiences alongside academic pursuits.
- +High-quality, well-structured, and engaging programmes, including online options.
- +Expert, passionate instructors and well-structured, relevant courses.
- +Real-world experience through consulting projects.
- +Strong student support and career preparation resources.
- +Engaging courses with practical application
- +Supportive and friendly lecturers
- +Vibrant campus and social activities
- +High-quality, relevant, and well-structured programmes.
- +Supportive and accessible academic and administrative staff.
- +Excellent online learning platform and extensive library resources.
- +Supportive staff and wellbeing resources
- +Smooth application process and fast feedback
- +Career coaching and employable skills development
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Outdated or non-functional facilities and lack of practical experience.
- -Unorganized course structure and unhelpful, unresponsive, or self-promoting lecturers.
- -Difficulty in reaching professors and poor communication regarding course relevance.
- -Outdated curriculum and irrelevant course content
- -Inadequate facilities and poor infrastructure
- -Insufficient teaching time due to project focus
- -Poor quality teaching and unclear assignments.
- -Lack of support from staff and unfair grading.
- -Suboptimal learning environment.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
- -A lack of adequate resources and support hinders academic progress.
- -Administrative and management issues caused significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance were major drawbacks.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty was a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, the university presents a strong showing across most metrics. Its highest-rated aspects include Internationality and Location, both exceeding 4.5. Student Life and Facilities also score well above average. The area with the lowest score is Accomodation, registering significantly lower than other categories. Value and Professors also received solid, though not leading, scores.
The university garners exceptional ratings for its Internationality (4.76) and Location (4.59), indicating strengths in these aspects. Facilities also received a high score (4.50). Conversely, Accomodation (3.83) and Professors (3.93) received the lowest scores, suggesting these are areas for potential improvement. Student Life (4.34) and Value (4.08) fall in the middle range.
Regarding university ratings, **Location** stands out as the strongest area, boasting a score of 4.67. **Facilities** also scored very highly at 4.56, followed closely by **Student Life** at 4.49. **Accomodation**, however, emerged as the weakest aspect, with a rating of 3.94. Other areas like **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value** received solid mid-range scores, generally above 4.2.
This institution receives commendable ratings, particularly excelling in Professors, Internationality, and Value, all scoring an impressive 4.59. Facilities and Location are also highly rated at 4.47 and 4.41 respectively. Student Life is rated well at 4.18. The area with the lowest rating is Accomodation, coming in at 3.88.
This institution shines in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its facilities and location, alongside excellent marks for internationality and value. Student life receives a solid rating. However, accommodation stands out as a weaker point, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Professors are also highly regarded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a ~98.7% positive sentiment (4.25/5 average), students praise engaging teaching, strong support, and a vibrant campus life. Limited negative feedback (~1.3%) mentions course structure and professor accessibility issues.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable instructors, relevant coursework, and career support. A small portion of feedback points to issues with program structure and facilities.
With an average rating of 4.39/5 from 131 reviews, approximately 89% of students praise good courses and helpful teaching. A small number, around 1.5%, mention unhelpful tutors or questionable assignments.
All 17 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students highlight excellent modules, supportive staff, and high-quality education equipping them for real-life situations. The university's facilities and online learning platform are also frequently praised.
All five reviews are positive, with students praising supportive staff and departments, smooth application processes, and helpful career coaching. Resources like a large library and advance module content are also highlighted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The course content is well-structured and covers key areas such as digital forensics, threat intelligence, network security, incident response, and cyber risk management. One of the biggest strengths of the programme is its practical approach. Lab-based sessions, real-world case studies, and hands-on tools helped me understand how cyber attacks and investigations work in real scenarios. The lecturers are knowledgeable, supportive, and approachable, and they encourage critical thinking and independent research. The university also offers good learning resources, including online materials, libraries, and lab facilities. Group projects and assignments helped develop teamwork, problem-solving, and technical skills, which are very important for a career in cyber security. Overall, the programme prepared me well for further study and professional opportunities in the cyber security field. However, there are some areas that could be improved. In some modules, the workload was quite heavy within a short period, which made it challenging to manage deadlines. A few topics could have been explained in more depth, especially advanced threat intelligence and real-world industry tools. Additionally, more industry collaboration, internships, or career guidance would make the programme even stronger. Some technical resources and lab environments could also be updated to reflect the latest cyber security trends and technologies.
Nothing to show
I thoroughly love my university. They are so helpful with any problem or situation. Great location and everyone is lovely Always wants the best for students and the facilities are fantastic. They use an app called moodle so you can access lectures PowerPoint slides coursework exams the lot. Student hubs are available across campus to talk to people about any issues you have wether it’s financial issues to mental health issues. Some buildings possibly good be re built/ re decorated to be modernised.
University of Salford has one of the best standards and quality of education. Their courses are of high quality and they offer very good programmes.My time with the school has been very good as they are supportive in all areas of need and the school is very flexible in times of financial and academic challenges.
It’s a good place to study with lots of activities to do do and with a lot of useful resources as they have a 4 floor library which is great to find studies or even a quite place to study. The modules are set out perfectly with all the content already put up in advance for the students to have a look at so that they can study in advance and have a look through before lessons.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
