University of Tartu - UT vs Tallinn University - TLU vs Tallinn University of Technology - TalTech vs Estonian Business School - EBS vs Estonian Entrepreneurship University of Applied Sciences - EUAS
Side-by-side comparison from 54 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic focus and world-class education
- +Approachable and supportive professors
- +Vibrant student life and welcoming community
- +Organized and diverse study themes, including e-studies
- +Central location and modern campus facilities
- +Focus on social and humanitarian sciences
- +Practical, industry-focused programs with collaborative opportunities
- +Skilled teachers and helpful staff
- +Diverse academic and career opportunities
- +Excellent academics and practical learning approach
- +Strong international focus and diverse student body
- +Career development support and entrepreneurship opportunities
- +Comprehensive and practical business programs
- +Supportive and engaged faculty
- +Strong industry connections and career opportunities
- +High-quality education with practical skills focus
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Engaging learning environment with good remote options and activities
- -Lack of practical skills training and outdated curriculum.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
- -Resistance to new methods and international engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support are major concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a constant concern.
- -Lack of communication and support negatively impacts the student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a concern.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.
- -Administrative & management issues are a significant concern.
- -Insufficient resources and poor learning curve hinder academic success.
- -Rising tuition fees without commensurate value are a major point of dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
- -The teaching quality and curriculum are often criticized for being uninspiring or irrelevant.
The institution receives excellent marks in several key areas. Internationality and Value stand out with the highest scores. Location also garners strong approval. While Facilities achieve a respectable rating, they represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories, alongside Student Life and Accomodation. Professors and their teaching also score very well.
Overall, the university receives a mixed but generally positive reception. It excels in **Location**, scoring a notable 4.27, and **Professors** are also highly rated at 4.23. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are solid at 3.4 and 3.47 respectively, with **Value** also performing reasonably at 3.53. **Facilities** are rated moderately at 3.83. The most significant area for improvement lies in **Accomodation**, which received the lowest score of 2.33.
This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its facilities and location, both scoring very highly. Student life, professors, internationality, and value also receive positive marks. The weakest area, though still rated well, is accommodation. Overall, the institution offers a robust environment with notable advantages in its physical and geographical aspects.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several key areas. Its **location** and **internationality** are particularly well-regarded, with ratings of 4.94 and 4.5 respectively. Professors also receive excellent feedback at 4.6. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as a significantly weaker aspect, with a low score of 1.775. Student life and value for money also received solid ratings.
Outstanding marks were received for its prime **location**, scoring a perfect 5. The university also excels in **internationality**, earning a strong 4.5. Areas showing moderate strength include **professors**, **accommodation**, and **value**, all receiving 3.5. Conversely, **facilities** and **student life** were rated as the weakest points, both at 3.
This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its academic offerings and student experience. Professors receive a near-perfect score of 4.75, with facilities, location, and student life also scoring highly at 4.25 and 4.5 respectively. The primary area for improvement lies in accommodation, which received a lower rating of 3. Internationality also presents an opportunity for growth at 3.75, while the overall value is rated a solid 4.
With an average of 4.34/5, ~96.5% of reviews are positive. Students highlight approachable professors, strong academic and research focus, and a welcoming atmosphere. One review mentioned low educational levels and outdated teaching methods.
With an average rating of 3.75/5 from four reviews, feedback is mostly positive (~100%). Students highlight the university's organized study themes, distance learning options, and central, modern campus. Some suggest improvements in bureaucracy and flexibility.
With a 4.5/5 average rating from 10 reviews, approximately 90% are highly positive. Students highlight practical, industry-focused courses, career and academic opportunities, and skilled, helpful staff. Negative feedback is minimal (~0%).
All feedback is positive (~100%), with an average rating of 4.6/5 stars. Students highlight excellent academics, helpful professors, and practical learning, with a strong focus on entrepreneurship and internationality.
With an average rating of 3.5/5, student feedback is split evenly. Positive comments highlight the university's offerings, while negative reviews cite high costs and insufficient learning resources.
With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~75% of feedback is positive. Students praise high-quality education, practical skills, knowledgeable and supportive faculty, and engaging activities. No negative reviews were submitted.
Tartu, the city where the University is situated is commonly regarded as a student city. While the town plays a host to many cultural activities, the vibrant student life is as noteworthy and helps to synchronise several aspects of extra-curricular. With all these in sight, there are enough activities to go round regardless of one's background or preferences. You can tell how much the student community influences everyday life in the city when during the holidays, it seems like the world has entered into an apocalypse and existence ceased.
Nothing to show
I am an international master's student at TalTech. TalTech provides ample of opportunities to thrive oneself. 1) They have laboratories which are equipped with modern equipment. 2) Access to internet 24/7. 3) Various platforms to show your talent. 4) Quality of education is good but sometimes it's hard to understand some professors. There can be several reasons behind it. 1. He doesn't have command of that subject. 2. He is having language issues. 3. He is knowledgeable but not good at explaining.
Nothing to show
I have been here for almost 3 years. I am in my final semester. This university seems good online, but have proven to be very difficult in person. The university is already very expensive, and they keep increasing the amount every year. When it comes to the learning curve, it is very poor. It depends on the course, but generally, they do not provide enough resources to learn what is needed to survive and make it in the professional world. Most lecturers do not let you pass their course just because of class attendance. The only good thing about this university would have to be the people, networks, and friends you make along the way. You can easily bond with them over the same experiences faced while studying at this uni. So if I have to be honest, I would not recommend this university to any student coming here, unless the school improves afterwards.
Nothing to show
