University of Tartu - UT vs Tallinn University - TLU vs Tallinn University of Technology - TalTech vs Estonian Business School - EBS vs Estonian Entrepreneurship University of Applied Sciences - EUAS
Side-by-side comparison from 55 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic focus and world-class education
- +Approachable and supportive professors
- +Vibrant student life and welcoming community
- +Organized and diverse study themes, including e-studies
- +Central location and modern campus facilities
- +Focus on social and humanitarian sciences
- +Practical, industry-focused programs with collaborative opportunities
- +Skilled teachers and helpful staff
- +Diverse academic and career opportunities
- +Practical, skill-focused academics and helpful professors
- +Value for money and flexibility for combining study with work
- +Internationality and diverse academic and career opportunities
- +Comprehensive and practical business programs
- +Supportive and engaged faculty
- +Strong industry connections and career opportunities
- +Expert and passionate professors
- +International study opportunities
- +Well-located campuses and student life
- +Practical skills and modern tools
- +Helpful instructors and clear explanations
- +Confidence and portfolio building
- -Lack of practical skills training and outdated curriculum.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
- -Resistance to new methods and international engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support are major concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a constant concern.
- -Lack of communication and support negatively impacts the student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are consistently criticized.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured by many students.
- -Administrative & management issues are a significant concern.
- -Insufficient resources and poor learning curve hinder academic success.
- -Rising tuition fees without commensurate value are a major point of dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant problems.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication from the institution is unclear and infrequent.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a major frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
- -Communication breakdowns and a perceived lack of support contribute to student dissatisfaction.
The institution receives excellent marks in several key areas. Internationality and Value stand out with the highest scores. Location also garners strong approval. While Facilities achieve a respectable rating, they represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories, alongside Student Life and Accomodation. Professors and their teaching also score very well.
Overall, the university receives a mixed but generally positive reception. It excels in **Location**, scoring a notable 4.27, and **Professors** are also highly rated at 4.23. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are solid at 3.4 and 3.47 respectively, with **Value** also performing reasonably at 3.53. **Facilities** are rated moderately at 3.83. The most significant area for improvement lies in **Accomodation**, which received the lowest score of 2.33.
This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its facilities and location, both scoring very highly. Student life, professors, internationality, and value also receive positive marks. The weakest area, though still rated well, is accommodation. Overall, the institution offers a robust environment with notable advantages in its physical and geographical aspects.
This institution receives particularly high marks for its Location, scoring an impressive 4.95, and Professors, rated at 4.67. Students also appreciate the Internationality and Value, with scores of 4.25 and 4.4 respectively. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, with a rating of 2.42, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Facilities and Student Life also received solid, though not exceptional, scores.
Outstanding marks were received for its prime **location**, scoring a perfect 5. The university also excels in **internationality**, earning a strong 4.5. Areas showing moderate strength include **professors**, **accommodation**, and **value**, all receiving 3.5. Conversely, **facilities** and **student life** were rated as the weakest points, both at 3.
This institution receives outstanding marks for its prime **location** and robust **internationality**, both scoring a perfect 5. Excellent **professors** (4.7) and **facilities** (4.3) also contribute to a positive academic environment. Areas for development include **student life** and **accommodation**, both rated at 3.7. The **value** proposition is solid at 4.
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, and student life. Its internationality is also highly rated. However, the university's location and accommodation received more moderate scores. Overall, it presents a strong offering with a good value proposition.
With an average of 4.34/5, ~96.5% of reviews are positive. Students highlight approachable professors, strong academic and research focus, and a welcoming atmosphere. One review mentioned low educational levels and outdated teaching methods.
With an average rating of 3.75/5 from four reviews, feedback is mostly positive (~100%). Students highlight the university's organized study themes, distance learning options, and central, modern campus. Some suggest improvements in bureaucracy and flexibility.
With a 4.5/5 average rating from 10 reviews, approximately 90% are highly positive. Students highlight practical, industry-focused courses, career and academic opportunities, and skilled, helpful staff. Negative feedback is minimal (~0%).
All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students praise the excellent academics and helpful professors, noting practical learning and international focus.
With an average rating of 3.5/5, student feedback is split evenly. Positive comments highlight the university's offerings, while negative reviews cite high costs and insufficient learning resources.
With a 4/5 average rating, ~67% of reviews are positive. Students highlight passionate professors and the university's international opportunities. No negative feedback was received.
With one review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive, earning a 5/5 average. This single review highlights exceeding expectations, gaining practical skills, learning modern tools, and helpful instructors.
Tartu, the city where the University is situated is commonly regarded as a student city. While the town plays a host to many cultural activities, the vibrant student life is as noteworthy and helps to synchronise several aspects of extra-curricular. With all these in sight, there are enough activities to go round regardless of one's background or preferences. You can tell how much the student community influences everyday life in the city when during the holidays, it seems like the world has entered into an apocalypse and existence ceased.
Nothing to show
I am an international master's student at TalTech. TalTech provides ample of opportunities to thrive oneself. 1) They have laboratories which are equipped with modern equipment. 2) Access to internet 24/7. 3) Various platforms to show your talent. 4) Quality of education is good but sometimes it's hard to understand some professors. There can be several reasons behind it. 1. He doesn't have command of that subject. 2. He is having language issues. 3. He is knowledgeable but not good at explaining.
Nothing to show
I have been here for almost 3 years. I am in my final semester. This university seems good online, but have proven to be very difficult in person. The university is already very expensive, and they keep increasing the amount every year. When it comes to the learning curve, it is very poor. It depends on the course, but generally, they do not provide enough resources to learn what is needed to survive and make it in the professional world. Most lecturers do not let you pass their course just because of class attendance. The only good thing about this university would have to be the people, networks, and friends you make along the way. You can easily bond with them over the same experiences faced while studying at this uni. So if I have to be honest, I would not recommend this university to any student coming here, unless the school improves afterwards.
I attended Sigmund Freud University during the academic years 2022-2023, and overall, my experience with the faculty was a mix of highs and lows. One thing that stood out positively was the incredible support and dedication shown by the faculty members. The professors at SFU were genuinely invested in their students' success and were always willing to help whenever students sought their guidance. They were approachable, knowledgeable, and went above and beyond to assist students in understanding the course material and academic concepts. However, despite the impressive support from the faculty, I must highlight that the organization at SFU could be improved. The overall system seemed to lack coordination, leading to certain aspects of academic life feeling unorganized. For instance, course schedules and syllabi were sometimes updated at the last minute, causing confusion among students. Additionally, administrative processes, such as course registration and academic advising, could have been smoother and better streamlined. Moreover, some professors struggled with managing their workload and appeared stressed at times, which impacted their ability to provide a consistent and structured learning environment. This lack of organization affected the overall learning experience and hindered students' ability to fully engage with the material. In conclusion, SFU is a place where students can expect a lot of support from faculty members who are passionate about teaching and willing to help. The dedication of the professors is commendable and greatly contributes to the positive learning environment. However, the university could benefit from implementing better organizational strategies to ensure a smoother academic experience for its students. Despite the areas that need improvement, the support and guidance received from the faculty make SFU a worthwhile institution for those seeking a strong support system throughout their academic journey.
Nothing to show
