EU Business School vs Technical University of Dortmund - TU Dortmund vs WHU - Otto Beisheim School of Management vs IU International University of Applied Sciences vs South Westphalia University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 391 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Helpful professors and career support
- +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
- +Enriching overall student experience
- +Supportive international environment and integration
- +Strong academic programs with theory-practice balance
- +Excellent facilities and resources for study and well-being
- +Excellent faculty and practical learning experiences
- +International exposure and real-world business cases
- +Engaging program with opportunities for skill development and creativity
- +Flexible online study for work-life balance
- +Modern, intuitive digital platform for easy access
- +Relevant, high-quality educational content
- +Practical, hands-on curriculum and industry relevance
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +International environment and practical career preparation
- +High-quality lectures and academic planning
- +Diverse assessment methods
- +Opportunities for holistic student development
- +Strong international business programs
- +Positive semester abroad opportunities
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
- -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
- -Inadequate communication and administrative issues.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources.
- -Limited course variety and inflexible academic policies.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are consistently criticized.
- -Slow and unresponsive administrative processes, including grade processing and student support.
- -Poor staff attitude and lack of accountability for errors in student records and applications.
- -Inadequate support and guidance for online students.
- -Students are dissatisfied with administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative & management issues disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support causes frustration.
This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Facilities**, earning a perfect 5. Professors and Internationality also received very high marks. Conversely, the weakest area evaluated was **Accomodation**, receiving a score of 3.43. Student Life and Value were rated solidly, with Location also performing well.
Overall, this university garners very positive feedback. Its strongest aspects include excellent Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring a high 4.5. Value is also rated highly at 4.5. Areas with slightly lower scores are Student Life and Internationality, both at 3.5. Accommodations received a solid 4.
This institution garners notable praise in several key areas, with **Internationality** and **Professors** receiving particularly high scores. The **Value** proposition is also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect. Other aspects like Facilities, Location, and Student Life fall within a more moderate range of positive feedback.
Overall, this university garners excellent scores across most categories. Its strongest areas are internationality and value, both receiving perfect marks. Professors are also highly regarded. Facilities, location, and student life are rated very well. The weakest area is accommodation, which falls significantly below other metrics.
This institution performs exceptionally well in its teaching staff, earning a strong 4.5 for professors. Its facilities, location, internationality, and overall value also receive respectable scores of 3.5. Student life is rated moderately at 3. However, accommodation emerges as a significant weakness, with a low rating of 1.
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for location, student life, internationality, and value. Facilities are also highly rated, indicating a positive student experience. Conversely, the university's performance in professor quality and accommodation received moderate scores, suggesting these aspects could be areas for improvement.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 10 reviews, student feedback is ~100% positive. Recurring themes highlight academic quality, supportive professors, and excellent facilities. No negative feedback was provided.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (100% positive reviews) with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight experienced professors, a strong mix of theory and practical application, and enjoyable staff and fellow students.
~95% of reviews are positive, praising flexibility, modern platforms, and accessible materials. A small percentage (~5%) mention issues with grading delays and slow administrative support.
All 5 reviews were positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlighted practical, hands-on education, approachable faculty, and good career preparation. No negative feedback was reported.
With a 3.5/5 average rating from two reviews, approximately 50% are positive. Students highlight strong academic planning, lectures, and assessments for enhancing learning. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
With one review, the average rating is 4 out of 5 stars. This overwhelmingly positive feedback suggests a good experience, with no negative comments recorded.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
Nothing to show
Amazing program, it provides the perfect blend and opportunity to learn skills and also explore your creativity. Most professors are very experienced and well known within their field of expertise. Some are outstanding and provide you with great knowledge. There is a lot of emphases given to practical learning and group projects. WHU staff, as well as students, were good fun.
My experience with IU is very wonderful and exceptional. The learning process is smooth and easy especially for online students and the exams are well tailored to test your knowledge on what you have been learning. It is quite great indeed.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
