EU Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP vs Universidade de Santiago de Compostela - USC vs Johan Cruyff Institute

Side-by-side comparison from 342 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Johan Cruyff Institute (4.60)
EU Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP: wins 0/7 categories
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela - USC: wins 1/7 categories
Johan Cruyff Institute: wins 2/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 1/7 categories
Mestre Mateo School of Art and Design - EASD: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Barcelona, Spain
3.80
Read more reviews
220 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: Advertising and Marketing
Best programme: Biopharmaceutical Science
Barcelona, Spain
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
26 reviews
×
Best programme: Sport Management
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Best programme: Art and Design
Category ratings
Facilities
4.05
4.17
3.68
3.78
4.43
3.83
5.00
Win
Location
4.70
4.00
3.63
4.10
4.00
4.92
Win
4.00
Professors
3.98
4.00
3.82
4.20
4.71
Win
4.58
3.00
Internationality
4.69
3.83
3.30
4.10
4.71
4.92
5.00
Win
Student life
4.17
4.17
3.59
4.50
Win
4.29
4.08
3.00
Value
3.86
4.17
3.59
4.10
4.79
Win
4.17
4.00
Accommodation
3.48
4.60
3.16
4.25
4.21
3.67
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, industry-focused learning and expert professors
  • +Real-world application and out-of-class learning opportunities
  • +Vibrant international student community and campus life
  • +Supportive faculty and staff
  • +Modern facilities and resources
  • +Academic excellence and innovative methodology
  • +Practical, real-world skills training
  • +Professional, industry-experienced faculty
  • +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
  • +Passionate professors and quality education
  • +Rich academic offerings and research opportunities
  • +Diverse student services and extracurriculars
  • +Specialized sports management content and expert professors
  • +Valuable industry connections and networking opportunities
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and excellent staff support
  • +Strong academic programs and supportive instructors
  • +Opportunities for international exposure and cultural immersion
  • +Practical experience and career advancement support
  • +Small class sizes and quality teaching
  • +Strong design and artistic programs
  • +European exchange opportunities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
  • -Education quality is poor with outdated facilities and lack of resources.
  • -Accreditation issues limit future opportunities.
  • -Poor management and unqualified staff.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Lack of administrative support and disorganization.
  • -Low professor English proficiency and lack of student/teacher engagement.
  • -Poor organization and administrative issues.
  • -Lack of practical and useful course content.
  • -Outdated teaching methods and uninspired professors.
  • -Poor quality of education compared to other institutions.
  • -Poor quality of instruction and unengaging student discussions.
  • -Ineffective project management and lack of professional experience among peers.
  • -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities for early students.
  • -Poor campus environment and lack of engagement.
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt learning and student support.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder effective study.
  • -Lack of clear communication and feedback creates frustration.
Rating summary
What students say

The university excels in its **location** (4.7) and **internationality** (4.69), indicating a highly desirable and globally connected environment. **Student life** (4.17) also received a strong rating. The primary area for improvement lies in **accommodation** (3.48), which is the lowest-scoring category. Other aspects such as **facilities** (4.05), **professors** (3.98), and **value** (3.86) are rated moderately well.

This university garners strong approval, particularly for its **accommodation**, which achieved the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well. Conversely, **internationality** received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects. Professors, location, and value for money are all rated at a solid 4 out of 5.

This institution garners a solid academic reputation, with professors receiving a strong rating of 3.82. While facilities and student life also score well around 3.6, accommodation emerges as the weakest area, rated at 3.16. Internationality and value also present as moderate aspects of the university experience.

Student feedback indicates exceptional strength in **Student Life**, with a near-perfect score. **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Location** also received very favorable ratings. Conversely, **Facilities** represent the lowest-scoring area, though still a solid rating. **Internationality** and **Value** also performed well, contributing to an overall positive review.

Across several key areas, the institution receives commendable ratings. Its strongest performances are noted in Value and Internationality, both achieving near-perfect scores. Professors also garnered exceptionally high marks. The weakest area is Location, which, while still positive, is rated lower than other aspects. Student Life, Accomodation, and Facilities all fall within a strong middle range.

Considerable acclaim has been received across multiple university aspects. The institution excels particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.92. **Professors** also garnered high marks at 4.58. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.67, with **Facilities** also being a relative weakness at 3.83. **Student Life** and **Value** scored moderately well.

Excelling in several key areas, this institution receives top marks for its facilities, accommodation, and internationality. Conversely, areas for improvement include professors and student life, both scoring moderately. The location and overall value are also rated positively, indicating a generally well-regarded academic environment with specific strengths in physical resources and global engagement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~74% positive reviews and an average rating of 3.82/5, students highlight industry-expert professors and practical, real-world learning. Around 8% of feedback noted disorganization and basic curriculum.

Most reviews praise the academic environment, dedicated professors, and supportive staff. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with a specific director and teacher hiring practices.

Approximately 74% of 28 reviews are positive, highlighting professional, sector-active teachers and practical, real-world facilities. A small portion of feedback (~7%) expresses disappointment with low English proficiency among some professors and organizational issues.

About 74% of reviews are positive, praising passionate professors, quality education, and extensive student services like international programs and research opportunities. A small amount of negative feedback highlights impractical content and a lack of teaching passion.

University students largely praise the insightful sports management content, quality professors, and valuable networking opportunities, with a ~96% positive sentiment. A small fraction of feedback (~4%) mentions issues with academic support variability or program depth.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 based on 12 reviews, approximately 92% of feedback is positive, highlighting independent learning opportunities, practical professors, and a good study abroad experience. A small portion (~8%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with limited extracurriculars and job opportunities.

With a 4/5 average rating from 1 review, ~100% of feedback is positive. The single positive review highlights strong design programs, small class sizes, good teaching quality, and a charming city location. There is no negative feedback.

Rating distribution
5★
25%
71%
21%
17%
85%
67%
0%
4★
45%
0%
46%
52%
15%
25%
100%
3★
22%
14%
25%
27%
4%
0%
0%
2★
4%
0%
4%
2%
0%
8%
0%
1★
4%
14%
4%
2%
4%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Professor and teaching style

Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

A life-changing experience in Sports Industry

A perfect synergy between theoretical knowledge, practical application, and high-quality networking. After completing the Master in Sport Management at Johan Cruyff Institute, I took a major step forward in my career in the sports industry. What truly sets this institution apart is the closeness and support of the professors and staff, as well as the enriching experiences shared with fellow students. Without a doubt, it has been one of the most transformative decisions of my life.

For the love of Schiller

Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close