EU Business School vs IESE Business School vs Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich - LMU vs Munich Business School - MBS vs Macromedia University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 434 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors and staff
- +Strong career services and networking opportunities
- +Practical and interactive curriculum with international exposure
- +Inspiring cultural experiences and inclusive communities
- +Strong career advancement opportunities and alumni networks
- +High-quality academics and excellent faculty engagement
- +High-quality teaching and practical experience
- +Strong academic reputation and international environment
- +Well-organized programs with personalization options
- +Practical, real-world preparation and career readiness.
- +International perspective and global network development.
- +Supportive community, dedicated faculty, and networking opportunities.
- +Broadened horizons and excellent networking
- +Valuable real-world experience through company work
- +Supportive and understanding staff
Nothing to show
- +Relevant and varied course content
- +Helpful and educated faculty
- +Supportive university staff
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant disorganization.
- -Educational quality is perceived as basic with unhelpful or unprepared staff.
- -Facilities and extracurriculars are lacking, with accreditation concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Lack of communication and support from the institution is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of support and poor communication from staff are recurring problems.
- -Poor quality of education and lecturer qualifications.
- -High tuition fees disproportionate to class availability and contact hours.
Nothing to show
- -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
This institution garners significant praise for its **location** and **internationality**, both receiving near-perfect scores. Student life is also a strong suit, as is the quality of its facilities. However, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a considerably lower rating compared to other aspects. Value for money and professor ratings fall in the mid-range.
Overall, the university garners strong student satisfaction. Its most highly rated aspects include Internationality (4.74), Location (4.73), and Student Life (4.70). Professors (4.62) and Value (4.64) also receive excellent scores. The weakest area, though still positive, is Accomodation at 4.09, while Facilities are rated at 4.36.
This institution garners strong marks across the board. Its **facilities** stand out with the highest rating at 4.27. The **value** proposition is also highly regarded, scoring 4.25. Areas like **professors**, **location**, and **student life** are all rated around 4.19-4.20, indicating solid performance. **Accommodation** is the relatively weakest area, though still positive at 4.04. **Internationality** also scores well at 4.15.
This institution receives high marks across most aspects of the student experience. Location and Student Life are particularly strong, both exceeding a 4.2 rating. Internationality also scores very well. The primary area for improvement seems to be Accommodation, which has the lowest rating at just under 4.0. Other categories, including Facilities, Professors, and Value, are consistently rated above 4.1.
Examining the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The institution excels particularly in **Internationality**, earning a high score. Strong performance is also noted for **Location** and **Professors**. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Value** received the lowest ratings, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive professors, practical courses, and career services. ~7% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization, basic education quality, and fees.
With a ~100% positive rating, reviews highlight exceptional experiences, transformative professional growth, and excellent faculty. Students praise the welcoming culture, global diversity, and strong career connections. No negative feedback was recorded.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~98%), with an average rating of 4.08/5. Students praise the high quality of teaching, practical project opportunities, and enriching international environment. Negative feedback is negligible.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~93%), highlighting well-structured programs, supportive environments, and strong career preparation. Students appreciate the international perspective, networking opportunities, and practical teaching approaches. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 3/5 from three reviews, approximately 67% of feedback is negative. Students cite concerns about academic quality and value for money. One positive review highlighted broad horizons and networking opportunities.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
Being at IESE was one of the best experiences of my life: 1- Professionally: this MBA is one of the best connected schools with top consultancy and banking sectors. for example, the 3 MBBs come to the school to train and interview candidates, ensuring a higher successful rate. It allowed me to jump from a civil engineering position to work for McKinsey. 2- Personal and cultural : amazing transformative 2 years, with people from all over the world (73 nationalities in my class) with great values. Totally worthy it.
There are superior facilities at the FH Aachen. The tutorial halls and classes are sophisticated, equipped with the the current and innovative equipment, and the library is large and well-stocked. To guarantee that students have a positive college experience, the educational facility also offers a range of extracurricular activities and events.
I studied for 4 months in MBS (I did my Erasmus there) and I have nothing but good and kind words for this place. Their methodology is much different than what I was used to in Barcelona: all the classes were practical, with little or none theory explained and everything explained through real-case scenarios or simulations. The fact that the teachers were, most of the times, business men and women that where working part-time as teachers, allowed students to learn current hot topics that were trending on some kinds of industry. Some of the subjects have no exams and instead they have a final project (for example, International Business Project of HR Management) that has to be done in groups, allowing yourself to develop teambuilding and teamworking skills. Also, the fact that classes are quite small allow for a better teacher-student communication. Other than that, the Erasmus Programme of this university is quite recognized worldwide, making students not just from Europe, but from the world, to go to study in MBS. The variety of cultures and people that you meet allow for a more, better open-minded way of thinking. Something I would recommend: International Business Project class and HR Management. Also, German can be learned in different levels according to your skills. Something that I did not like that much: the wifi was quite slow and it was hard to connect to sometimes. Hope they have improved it!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.
