EU Business School vs Sustainability Management School - SUMAS vs Webster University Geneva vs INSEEC Business School vs Institut Avrio de Geneve
Side-by-side comparison from 248 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Experienced professors and practical business insights
- +International and diverse student community
- +Strong emphasis on practical application and career development
- +High-quality teaching and supportive instructors.
- +Excellent career services and networking opportunities.
- +Engaging campus life and diverse student community.
- +Diverse international environment and global network
- +Small class sizes and individualized support
- +Accessible campus with many clubs and leadership development programs
- +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
- +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Excellent and helpful online classes and lectures
- +Beautiful campus and vibrant student life
- +Strong academic reputation and international recognition
- -- Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and poor student support.
- -- Educational quality is considered basic, with a lack of proper facilities and learning resources.
- -- The university prioritizes financial gain over genuine educational experience and accreditation.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Lack of transparency and poor communication are recurring problems.
- -Unprofessionalism and unresponsiveness from staff are highly criticized.
- -Excessive homework and difficult grading policies are often criticized.
- -Students express frustration with administrative inefficiencies and poor management.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
- -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are common complaints.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and insufficient support are problematic.
An assessment of this university reveals strong performance in **Internationality (4.70)** and **Location (4.68)**, indicating excellent global appeal and advantageous placement. Student life and facilities also received positive scores, around 4.0. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation (3.49)**, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with distinct strengths in its international reach and location.
This institution excels in its **Internationality**, earning a high rating of 4.5. However, significant weaknesses are evident in **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, both receiving the lowest score of 1. **Facilities** and **Value** also present areas for improvement with ratings of 1.5. While **Professors** scored moderately at 3, the university's **Location** also received a middling 2.5.
This institution garners positive feedback across multiple aspects. Its strongest areas include Location, Student Life, Accomodation, and Internationality, all scoring an impressive 4.33. Facilities and Professors are rated solidly at 4, while Value also stands at 4. The university demonstrates a well-rounded offering with a slight edge in student experience and external factors compared to its academic and physical resources.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for Location, Student Life, and Accomodation. Facilities and Value also received strong marks. Professors and Internationality were rated well, though they represent the areas with slightly lower, yet still positive, scores compared to the university's standout features.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors and international networking opportunities. Negative feedback, about 7.9%, cites disorganization and basic course content. The average rating is 3.83/5.
Both university reviews are negative, rating it 1/5. Recurring themes include administrative issues, unresponsiveness, and unprofessional management, leading to a strong negative sentiment (~100% of feedback).
All three reviews are positive, averaging 4.33/5 stars. Students highlight the strong international environment, small class sizes, and the benefits of its Geneva location, with ~100% of feedback being positive.
Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3.5/5, positive feedback (~50%) highlights excellent online classes and a great learning environment. Negative feedback is negligible, representing ~0% of the total.
Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.
I am a recent graduate of this university and overall, I would not recommend this university to anyone looking to continue their education. Many of my classmates and I had consistent issues with the administration that hindered our learning and dampened our experience. When we tried to propose changes or discuss problems, the administration was not open to working with us. Response times were lengthy and grading was subjective, with no true transparency into how they were determined. This made many of us afraid to speak up, which is why I am doing so now, after I have secured my diploma today. The biggest disappointment for me was the lack of career services. Since this was heavily marketed to me when I was considering this school, I was shocked to learn there is no career office, no career fairs, and no real effort to connect students with alumni who could help us advance our careers. When I approached the administration about the career fair issue, they claimed that career fairs were only possible with the help of student council and that no students had run for a position this year. This was shocking news to me since the school did not hold an Autumn student council election and the Spring election took place less than 2 months before 21 of the 23 students were graduating, thus students would not have been able to make any real change in their remaining time. In my time at SUMAS I did learn a lot and was fortunate to have some great professors who equipped me with knowledge and tools for my career, and I am grateful to them. However, the quality of the education does not outweigh all of the issues we experienced which is why I do not recommend this school to others. ** carefully read their accreditation because they are not accredited by any of the big accreditation organizations that are widely recognized
Nothing to show
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
