EU Business School vs University of Cologne - UZK vs CBS International Business School - CBS vs TH Köln University of Applied Sciences vs Hochschule Fresenius
Side-by-side comparison from 300 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse international environment and networking opportunities
- +Experienced, knowledgeable, and supportive professors with real-world insights
- +Innovative and practical business programs
- +Excellent academic programs and research opportunities
- +Supportive faculty and positive learning atmosphere
- +Vibrant campus environment and city life
- +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty with real-world experience
- +Practical, industry-focused curriculum and learning opportunities
- +Positive campus environment and networking potential
- +Quality international education and engaging learning environment
- +Supportive professors and effective teaching methods
- +Relevant and well-structured academic programs
- +Relevant and varied course content
- +Helpful and educated faculty
- +Supportive university staff
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
- +Strong international business programs
- +Positive semester abroad opportunities
- -Administrative disorganization and unhelpful staff cause significant problems.
- -The quality of education and academic rigor are considered poor.
- -Facilities and extracurricular support are severely lacking.
- -Overly demanding coursework and preparation requirements for math programs.
- -Inconvenient class scheduling, including early morning times.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Ineffective teaching and lack of student support are significant problems.
- -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
- -Administrative & management issues disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support causes frustration.
Based on the provided ratings, this institution excels in **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving a high score of 4.7. **Student Life** is also a strong point, rated at 4.22. The university's weakest area is **Accomodation**, which scores 3.44, indicating room for improvement in this aspect. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience with standout features.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in **Student Life** (4.37) and **Location** (4.3). **Value** (4.26) and **Internationality** (4.16) also received positive marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.64) appears to be the weakest area, receiving a noticeably lower score compared to other aspects of the university experience. Ratings for **Facilities** and **Professors** are solid and consistent.
This university demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Internationality**, which received the highest rating, and its excellent **Facilities** and vibrant **Student Life**. **Professors** and the **Value** for money also scored highly. Conversely, **Accomodation** presented the lowest rated aspect, with **Location** also scoring moderately.
This institution receives excellent marks, with perfect scores for its facilities and location. Areas such as professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are also highly rated, all scoring an average of 4.33. The university demonstrates considerable strengths across multiple facets of the student experience.
With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for location, student life, internationality, and value. Facilities are also highly rated, indicating a positive student experience. Conversely, the university's performance in professor quality and accommodation received moderate scores, suggesting these aspects could be areas for improvement.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting diversity, experienced professors, and networking opportunities. A small minority of ~7.7% of feedback mentions disorganization and basic course content.
With ~87% positive sentiment from 31 reviews, students praise excellent courses, dedicated faculty, and a vibrant academic and social environment. A small amount of negative feedback noted challenging coursework and scheduling issues.
Over 90% of reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable and approachable professors, interactive classes, and a modern campus. Some students desire more industry-focused events. No negative reviews were recorded.
All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight high-quality education, friendly professors, and well-taught lessons. Some noted concerns about affordable housing and job availability for international students.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
With one review, the average rating is 4 out of 5 stars. This overwhelmingly positive feedback suggests a good experience, with no negative comments recorded.
Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.
The top university is University of Cologne because of its thoughtfully constructed, secure, and accommodating environment, as well as its efficient and appropriate study facilities, I must say it is the best.
I've had a good experience so far while I've been studying at CBS. However, the majority of students are of German nationality, while there are also students from other nations. If you're feeling under the weather or don't feel like going to school, they provide a blended learning option that allows you to stay at home and participate in the class simultaneously online. The campus in Cologne is not particularly cutting-edge, but I've heard that the campus in Mainz is more or less cutting-edge and attractive. The instructors and departmental officials are all cordial. The School encourages pupils to participate in a variety of sports because it values a healthy balance between work and recreation. As a result of CBS's partnerships with various significant businesses, the School is able to maintain its curricula current with the needs of the modern business world. Additionally, partnerships allow CBS to give its students greater options for internships and professional experience. By participating in business projects in collaboration with well-known companies, students can also gain important information and skills.
Nothing to show
Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
