Brand Academy – University of Applied Sciences vs Hamburg University of Applied Sciences vs Kühne Logistics University - KLU vs Miami Ad School Germany vs Hochschule Fresenius
Side-by-side comparison from 47 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Quality teaching and environment
- +Strong academic and career focus
- +Dedicated professors and engaging sustainability focus
- +Positive campus atmosphere and events
- +Supportive faculty and student engagement
- +Specialized, practical curriculum with industry connections
- +Supportive, approachable faculty and welcoming community
- +Career advancement and networking opportunities
- +Accessible and helpful professors
- +Supportive campus environment and career services
- +Continuous improvement and promising future outlook
- +Relevant and varied course content
- +Helpful and educated faculty
- +Supportive university staff
- +Hands-on learning and practical application focus
- +International and multicultural environment
- +Personalized attention and smaller class sizes
- +Integrated business and technology education for practical application.
- +Small class sizes and personal lecturer/staff interaction.
- +Strong focus on entrepreneurship and innovation.
- -Disorganized administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and resources.
- -Lack of support and engaging teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient support services are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -Teaching quality and course relevance are often criticized.
- -Poor administrative and management issues are frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support causes confusion.
- -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor organization and miscommunication.
- -Outdated teaching methods and inadequate facilities.
- -Lack of academic integrity and student support.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are recurring complaints.
This institution garners a perfect score of 5 across all assessed categories. Its strengths are exceptionally broad, encompassing facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. There are no discernible weak areas based on these ratings. The university presents a uniformly excellent picture for prospective students.
This institution excels in several key areas, with professors and student life receiving particularly strong scores. Internationality and value also stand out as notable strengths. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest aspect of the university's offerings. Facilities and location are rated moderately, falling between the strongest and weakest points.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Location**, with an outstanding rating of 4.92. **Internationality** and **Professors** also received very high marks, reflecting well on its global reach and academic staff. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, receiving a significantly lower rating. Overall, the university presents a positive picture, with most aspects scoring above 4.5.
This institution achieves an outstanding perfect score for Student Life, indicating a vibrant campus experience. Professors, Accommodation, and Internationality also score highly, each receiving 4.67. Facilities and Location are rated well at 4.33. The Value score, at 4, represents the weakest area among the surveyed categories.
With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **internationality**, receiving a high rating of 4. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as a significant area for improvement, with the lowest score of 1.4. Other aspects like location and professors show moderate performance.
This institution garners exceptional ratings in several key areas. Professors and accommodation stand out with perfect scores, indicating a highly valued academic staff and excellent housing options. Student life and facilities also received near-perfect marks, suggesting a vibrant campus environment and well-equipped resources. Conversely, internationality and value represent the weaker aspects, with ratings of 4.4, suggesting potential areas for enhancement in global engagement and affordability.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback with a 5/5 average rating. The sole review highlights excellent teaching and a supportive environment, contributing to a ~100% positive sentiment.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~67%). Students praise dedicated professors and impactful sustainability initiatives. Some suggest improvements to dining facilities and lecture duration.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~96% of feedback being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.77/5. Students highlight specialized programs, practical learning, supportive professors, and strong networking opportunities. No negative feedback was recorded.
All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight supportive professors, engaging academics, and good campus facilities and student life. Career support and community are also frequently praised.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.
Reviews indicate a 3/5 average rating, with ~60% positive feedback highlighting practical, hands-on learning and a multicultural environment. Negative feedback, ~40%, points to poor organization, miscommunication, and outdated teaching methods.
All 6 reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. Students highlight the strong focus on technology and entrepreneurship, practical learning, and a welcoming atmosphere. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience at KLU has truly been life-changing. This university has given me a second chance and opened the door to a completely new life filled with opportunities. From the very beginning, it has felt like a second home. What makes KLU so special is the people. Every single person here is supportive and genuinely willing to help. The professors are not only highly qualified and professional, but also approachable and always ready to guide you in any academic or professional matter. I have never been in a place like this before. The strong connection with industry, the quality of events, and the incredible network of classmates and alumni create the perfect environment for both personal and professional growth. I will always be grateful to KLU for everything I have experienced here.
Nothing to show
Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.
Throughout my Studies, in the Communication Design Course at this university located in Berlin, I have experienced a lot of problems. The university is very poorly organized, there is constant miscommunication between staff and students. It is very hard to come in contact with the university over email or phone, and most of the time your issue is never resolved. An excuse they often times use, is that they are understaffed, or it’s the students' fault. I think the campus in Berlin is kind of scam, because when applying or looking up this University the only photos you can see are from their facility located in Hamburg. Which is a much nicer facility than the one in Berlin. Definitely visit before signing any contracts. When I joined the university I expected at least one course to provide the necessary skills and information for this course. There was no introductory class for how to use Adobe software, no tutorial classes on any of the skills we needed during our studies. This is very much a do it yourself at home Programme. It is very hard to get help from the staff as they are often very misleading as no information is communicated to them. I have graduated 2 months ago and I still have no received a diploma.
This was the best Varsity ever. The professionalism is on the high level. I have no dislikes and I highly recommend it to people who are struggling with focus. It's takes special students with disabilities.
