De Montfort University - DMU vs Almaty Technological University - ATU vs Turan University vs KIMEP University - KIMEP vs University of Central Asia
Side-by-side comparison from 72 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive & engaging lecturers
- +Modern campus & excellent facilities
- +Welcoming & diverse student community
- +Engaging and inspiring teaching
- +Excellent career support and opportunities
- +Strong sense of community and belonging
Nothing to show
- +Engaging programs foster passion and develop essential skills.
- +Positive peer relationships and community atmosphere are highly valued.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Good professors and modern campus
- +Strong support from the admission office
- +Effective advertising and diverse student body
- -Poor academic quality and limited credit transferability.
- -Unresponsive and unconstructive faculty feedback.
- -Inefficient and problematic administrative processes.
- -Boring training system.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and course structure leads to confusion.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Excessive administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of student support and resources.
The university demonstrates impressive strengths, particularly in its **Location** (4.36) and **Student Life** (4.34). **Facilities** (4.33) and **Internationality** (4.31) also receive highly favorable scores. Among the rated aspects, **Professors** (4.09) present the relatively weakest area, though still well-regarded. **Accomodation** and **Value** are rated identically at 4.13.
This institution demonstrates a remarkably consistent performance across all assessed areas. Every category, from facilities and professors to student life and accommodation, received a top rating. Similarly, its location, internationality, and perceived value are all highlighted as exceptional. This suggests a comprehensively strong university experience with no particular weaknesses identified in this evaluation.
Nothing to show
This institution receives strong commendations, particularly in its location, student life, internationality, and value, all scoring a high 4.5. Accommodation is also well-regarded at 4. The academic staff are rated favorably at 4. The weakest area noted is facilities, which still achieve a solid 3.5 out of 5.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for Professors, Student Life, and Accommodation. Facilities and Internationality also receive strong ratings. However, the Value aspect stands out as the weakest, receiving a notably lower score compared to other categories, suggesting potential areas for improvement in terms of cost-effectiveness.
With ~83% positive sentiment, students praise supportive and engaging lecturers, modern campus facilities, and a friendly, diverse community. A small amount of negative feedback cited issues with administrative processes and teacher responsiveness.
The single review expressed strong dissatisfaction, with 100% of feedback being negative. The student found the university's training system boring and did not meet expectations, recommending against attendance.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5 stars and 100% positive feedback, students praise the university's journalism program for fostering a passion for storytelling and communication. A minor concern about rising tuition and some professor competence was outweighed by positive social experiences.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight good professors, a modern campus, and helpful admissions.
Regrettably, I cannot offer a recommendation for Comic and Concept art due to the following reasons: Firstly, the accessibility of the teachers proved to be quite challenging as they were unresponsive to multiple email attempts throughout the entire year. Moreover, the feedback provided was often overly vague and lacked constructive criticism, occasionally even being unnecessarily harsh. In some instances, no feedback was given at all. Submitting work was frequently an arduous task, as specific file formats were required that were incompatible with the content, such as demanding PDFs for documents that couldn't be formatted accordingly and were subsequently rejected. Furthermore, the lessons themselves were lacking in quality. Some lecturers would digress into unrelated topics, consuming valuable class time. The teaching approach was disappointingly minimal, with students being assigned tasks without any guidance or instructional techniques provided. If feedback was given, it was generally unhelpfully brief, merely stating that improvements were needed. The learning materials provided during the lessons were also subpar. Often, we were presented with pre-recorded 10-minute videos and expected to navigate our own way through the material. This lack of effort on the part of the lecturers was unfair and disheartening, making it challenging for students to invest their own efforts. The workload imposed on students was excessive and overwhelming, leading to the majority falling behind. Consequently, many students experienced a negative impact on their mental well-being, ultimately resulting in some dropping out. Additionally, the university failed to provide necessary information about the course, leaving students to rely on each other for essential details. Timetables and key information, including student cards, were significantly delayed without any valid explanation. Technological tools such as email, Blackboard, Teams, and attendance systems frequently malfunctioned, causing further frustration and hindrance to the learning experience. Tragically, instances of bullying were pervasive both within the classroom and online, including incidents targeting vulnerable individuals. Despite reporting these matters to the course leader, no action could be taken without the full names of the involved students, which was a requirement I couldn't fulfill. Regrettably, when I brought these concerns to the attention of the class representatives, they chose to ignore my pleas for assistance. Lastly, living in Leicester City proved to be unsafe, with prevalent cases of sexual harassment, homophobic and transphobic threats. Disturbingly, both the police and the university failed to take any meaningful action in response to these issues.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
